SOX17 promoter methylation in plasma circulating tumor DNA of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: SOX17 belongs to the high-mobility group-box transcription factor superfamily and down-regulates the Wnt pathway. The aim of our study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of SOX17 promoter methylation in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in plasma of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. METHODS: We examined the methylation status of SOX17 promoter in 57 operable NSCLC primary tumors and paired adjacent non-cancerous tissues and in ctDNA isolated from 48 corresponding plasma samples as well as in plasma from 74 patients with advanced NSCLC and 49 healthy individuals. SOX17 promoter methylation was examined by Methylation Specific PCR (MSP). RESULTS: In operable NSCLC, SOX17 promoter was fully methylated in primary tumors (57/57, 100%), and in corresponding ctDNA (27/48, 56.2%) while it was detected in only 1/49 (2.0%) healthy individuals. In advanced NSCLC, SOX17 promoter was methylated in ctDNA in 27/74 (36.4%) patients and OS was significantly different in favor of patients with non-methylated SOX17 promoter (p=0.012). Multivariate analysis revealed that SOX17 promoter methylation in ctDNA was an independent prognostic factor associated with OS in patients with advanced but not operable NSCLC. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that SOX17 promoter is highly methylated in primary tumors and in corresponding plasma samples both in operable and advanced NSCLC. In the advanced setting, SOX17 promoter methylation in plasma ctDNA has a statistical significant influence on NSCLC patient's survival time. Detection of SOX17 promoter methylation in plasma provides prognostic information and merits to be further evaluated as a circulating tumor biomarker in patients with operable and advanced NSCLC.

Treatment of relapsed urothelial bladder cancer with vinflunine: real-world evidence by the Hellenic Genitourinary Cancer Group.

Relapsed urothelial cancer represents an unmet medical need. Vinflunine is a third-generation antimicrotubuline inhibitor and is currently the only approved drug for second-line treatment across the European Union. We conducted a retrospective analysis assessing the efficacy and safety of vinflunine in 71 Greek patients with relapsed urothelial cancer who were treated between 2005 and 2014. An overall 84% of our patients received vinflunine as second-line treatment, 77% had a performance status of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale 0 or 1, and 30% had liver metastasis at the time of vinflunine administration. A median of four cycles of vinflunine were administered (range 1-16). The most common reported adverse events were constipation, fatigue, and anemia. Median progression-free survival was 6.2 months (95% confidence interval: 4.4-8.8) and overall survival was 11.9 months (95% confidence interval: 7.4-21). Two patients (3%) achieved a complete remission, seven a partial remission (10%), and 22 (31%) had stable disease according to an intention-to-treat analysis. Hemoglobin level less than 10 g/dl and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status greater than 1 were independent adverse prognostic factors. Stratification according to the Bellmunt risk model was also associated with progression-free survival and overall survival in our population. Vinflunine appears to be a safe and effective treatment modality for relapsed urothelial cancer. More effective therapies and more accurate prognostic algorithms should be sought.

Utilization of Systemic Chemotherapy in Advanced Urothelial Cancer: A Retrospective Collaborative Study by the Hellenic Genitourinary Cancer Group (HGUCG).

BACKGROUND: Advanced urothelial cancer (AUCa) is associated with poor long-term survival. Two major concerns are related to nonexposure to cisplatin-based chemotherapy and poor outcome after relapse. Our purpose was to record patterns of practice in AUCa in Greece, focusing on first-line treatment and management of relapsed disease. METHODS: Patients with AUCa treated from 2011 to 2013 were included in the analysis. Fitness for cisplatin was assessed by recently established criteria. RESULTS: Of 327 patients treated with first-line chemotherapy, 179 (55%) did not receive cisplatin. Criteria for unfitness for cisplatin were: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) ≥ 2, 21%; creatinine clearance ≤ 60 mL/min, 55%; hearing impairment, 8%; neuropathy, 1%; and cardiac failure, 5%. Forty-six patients (27%) did not fulfill any criterion for unfitness for cisplatin. The main reasons for these deviations were comorbidities (28%) and advanced age (32%). Seventy-four (68%) of 109 patients who experienced a relapse received second-line chemotherapy. The most frequent reason for not offering second-line chemotherapy was poor PS or limited life expectancy (66%). CONCLUSION: In line with international data, approximately 50% of Greek patients with AUCa do not receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy, although 27% of them were suitable for such treatment. In addition, about one third of patients with relapse did not receive second-line chemotherapy because of poor PS or short life expectancy. Enforcing criteria for fitness for cisplatin and earlier diagnosis of relapse represent 2 targets for improvement in current treatment practice for AUCa.

A multicenter phase II trial with irinotecan plus oxaliplatin as first-line treatment for inoperable/metastatic cancer of the biliary tract.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of oxaliplatin (L-OHP) in combination with irinotecan (CPT-11) as first-line treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed nonresectable biliary adenocarcinoma were treated with oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2)) and irinotecan (200 mg/m(2)) every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled between May 2005 and March 2009. The overall objective response rate was 17.9% with an additional 21.4% of patients with stable disease (disease control rate 39.3%). The median overall survival time was 9.2 months (95% CI 5.8-12.5) and the median progression-free survival time 2.7 months (95% CI 2.2-3.2). Grades 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 1 (3.6%) and 4 (14.3%) patients, respectively, and febrile neutropenia in 3 (10.7%). Grade 3-4 diarrhea was observed in 2 (7.1%) patients and grade 3 asthenia in 1 (6%). There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: The combination of oxaliplatin and irinotecan has a modest antitumor activity with manageable toxicity as first-line treatment in metastatic cancer of the biliary tract and therefore it cannot be recommended as front-line treatment for unresectable biliary tract cancer.

A multicenter phase II study of the combination of irinotecan and gemcitabine in previously treated patients with small-cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate efficacy and toxicity of the combination of irinotecan and gemcitabine in pretreated patients having small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients (median age 60 years, performance status 0-1 in 87% and 2 in 13% of the patients) with limited or extensive-stage disease, refractory or relapsing after at least one prior chemotherapy regimen, received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 and irinotecan 300 mg/m(2) on day 8, every 21 days. Sixteen (52%) patients had sensitive and 15 (48%) refractory disease. Fifteen patients (48%) had received > or =2 prior regimens. RESULTS: All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 26 for response analysis. A median of three (range 1-6) cycles per patient was administered. Three partial responses were documented for an overall response rate of 10% (95% CI 0.73-20.09), and disease stabilization was obtained in 7 patients (22%; intention-to-treat analysis). Two of the responders had refractory, and 1 had sensitive disease. The median time to progression was 4.5 months, the median duration of responses was 2.5 months, and the median survival time was 6 months. Grade 3-4 (WHO) neutropenia was observed in 9 patients (29%), grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in 4 (13%), and grade 3-4 diahrrea in 3 patients (10%). Three patients experienced febrile neutropenia. No toxic deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The combination showed modest activity in this patient group with a poor prognosis. Thus we believe it merits further investigation in the treatment of patients with small-cell lung cancer who have failed one prior chemotherapy regimen.

A multicenter phase II study of the combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel in previously treated patients with small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel in pretreated patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-two pretreated patients (median age 61 years, PS: 0-1 in 77% and 2 in 23%) with limited or extensive stage disease were treated with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and docetaxel 75 mg/m2 on day 8, every 21 days. Fifteen (68%) of the 22 patients had received two prior regimens and fourteen (64%) were refractory to front-line chemotherapy. RESULTS: All patients were evaluable for efficacy analysis. No complete or partial responses were observed. Disease stabilization was obtained in one (5%) patient. The median survival was 14 weeks and the six-month survival rate was 28%. WHO grade 2 and 3 toxicities were infrequent and easily manageable. CONCLUSION: The combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel was inactive as salvage treatment in this poor prognosis group of patients with SCLC.