Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Peptides ; 129: 170318, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32330539

ABSTRACT

Intestinal or mesenteric ischemia generally leads to inflammation and injury, potentially developing hypoxia, causing cell death and tissue necrosis. This in turn can lead to sepsis and shock. Conversely, following shock, the intestinal tract is a main organ to experience ischemic/reperfusion injury. Increased intestinal cell-membrane permeability through mesenteric ischemia provoking bacterial translocation and gut-barrier injury can lead to sepsis and multi-organ failure. Hypotension induced by systemic vasodilation and vascular leak in systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis is countered by immediate fluid resuscitation and vasopressor administration, primarily norepinephrine (NE), with possible arginine vasopressin (AVP) supplementation, an agonist of vasopressin V1A and V2 receptors. Selepressin is a selective V1A-receptor agonist, avoiding potential V2 receptor-associated adverse effects. Selepressin, non-selective AVP, and NE effects on mesenteric blood flow (MBF) and gastric mucosa perfusion (GMP) were compared in control rabbits and a lipopolysaccharide-induced, fluid-resuscitated rabbit endotoxemia model. AVP induced a pronounced decrease in MBF and GMP in non-endotoxemic and endotoxemic rabbits, whereas the reduction after selepressin treatment was significantly less for both indicators in the endotoxemic animals. By contrast, NE increased the MBF and did not affect GMP in both groups. Selepressin and AVP induced a pronounced dose-dependent increase in mesenteric vascular resistance in non-endotoxemic and endotoxemic rabbits, tending to be less in endotoxemic animals, whereas a minor increase in both groups was observed with NE. Therefore, in this safety study, the risk for mesenteric ischemia on selepressin treatment was not inferior to AVP, being less in endotoxemic than in non-endotoxemic animals.


Subject(s)
Arginine Vasopressin/metabolism , Endotoxemia/metabolism , Gastric Mucosa/metabolism , Receptors, Vasopressin/metabolism , Sepsis/metabolism , Animals , Arginine Vasopressin/genetics , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Endotoxemia/genetics , Gastric Mucosa/drug effects , Hypotension/metabolism , Hypotension/pathology , Male , Mesenteric Ischemia/genetics , Mesenteric Ischemia/metabolism , Mesenteric Ischemia/pathology , Rabbits , Receptors, Vasopressin/agonists , Receptors, Vasopressin/genetics , Sepsis/genetics
2.
PLoS One ; 11(10): e0165422, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27788216

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Septic shock remains associated with significant mortality rates. Arginine vasopressin (AVP) and analogs with V1A receptor agonist activity are increasingly used to treat fluid-resistant vasodilatory hypotension, including catecholamine-refractory septic shock. Clinical studies have been restricted to healthy volunteers and catecholamine-refractory septic shock patients excluding subjects with cardiac co-morbidities because of presumed safety issues. The novel selective V1A receptor agonist selepressin, with short half-life, has been designed to avoid V2 receptor-related complications and long-term V1A receptor activation. Cardiovascular safety of selepressin, AVP, and the septic shock standard of care norepinephrine was investigated in a rabbit model of early-stage atherosclerosis. METHODS: Atherosclerosis was established in New Zealand White rabbits using a 1% cholesterol-containing diet. Selepressin, AVP, or norepinephrine was administered as cumulative intravenous infusion rates to atherosclerotic and non-atherosclerotic animals. RESULTS: Selepressin and AVP induced a slight dose-dependent increase in arterial pressure (AP) associated with a moderate decrease in heart rate, no change in stroke volume, and a moderate decrease in aortic blood flow (ABF). In contrast, norepinephrine induced a marked dose-dependent increase in AP associated with a lesser decrease in the heart rate, an increase in stroke volume, and a moderate increase in ABF. For all three vasopressors, there was no difference in responses between atherosclerotic and non-atherosclerotic animals. CONCLUSION: Further studies should be considered using more advanced atherosclerosis models, including with septic shock, before considering septic shock clinical trials of patients with comorbidities. Here, selepressin and AVP treatments did not display relevant cardiovascular risk in early-stage rabbit atherosclerosis.


Subject(s)
Arginine Vasopressin/adverse effects , Arginine Vasopressin/chemistry , Atherosclerosis/chemically induced , Animals , Aorta/drug effects , Aorta/physiopathology , Arterial Pressure/drug effects , Atherosclerosis/metabolism , Atherosclerosis/physiopathology , Biomarkers/metabolism , Blood Circulation/drug effects , Male , Rabbits , Risk
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27039257

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The Safety Pharmacology Society (SPS) and National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement & Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs) conducted a survey and workshop in 2015 to define current industry practices relating to housing of non-rodents during telemetry recordings in safety pharmacology and toxicology studies. The aim was to share experiences, canvas opinion on the study procedures/designs that could be used and explore the barriers to social housing. METHODS: Thirty-nine sites, either running studies (Sponsors or Contract Research Organisations, CROs) and/or outsourcing work responded to the survey (51% from Europe; 41% from USA). RESULTS: During safety pharmacology studies, 84, 67 and 100% of respondents socially house dogs, minipigs and non-human primates (NHPs) respectively on non-recording days. However, on recording days 20, 20 and 33% of respondents socially house the animals, respectively. The main barriers for social housing were limitations in the recording equipment used, study design and animal temperament/activity. During toxicology studies, 94, 100 and 100% of respondents socially house dogs, minipigs and NHPs respectively on non-recording days. However, on recording days 31, 25 and 50% of respondents socially house the animals, respectively. The main barriers for social housing were risk of damage to and limitations in the recording equipment used, food consumption recording and temperament/activity of the animals. CONCLUSIONS: Although the majority of the industry does not yet socially house animals during telemetry recordings in safety pharmacology and toxicology studies, there is support to implement this refinement. Continued discussions, sharing of best practice and data from companies already socially housing, combined with technology improvements and investments in infrastructure are required to maintain the forward momentum of this refinement across the industry.


Subject(s)
Hemodynamics/drug effects , Housing, Animal , Social Environment , Animals , Dogs , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Pharmacology/methods , Primates , Safety , Surveys and Questionnaires , Swine , Swine, Miniature , Telemetry , Temperament , Toxicology/methods
4.
Toxicol Pathol ; 44(3): 367-72, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26674803

ABSTRACT

Minipigs have been used for dermal drug development studies for decades, and they are currently more frequently considered as the second nonrodent species for pivotal nonclinical studies, in lieu of the dog or nonhuman primate, for compounds delivered via standard systemic routes of administration. Little is known about the tolerability of different excipients in minipigs; sharing knowledge of excipient tolerability and compositions previously used in nonclinical studies may avoid testing of inadequate formulations, thereby contributing to reduced animal usage. This article reviews vehicles employed in the Göttingen(®)minipig based on the combined experience from a number of pharmaceutical companies and contract research organizations. The review includes vehicles tolerated for single or multiple dosing by the Göttingen minipig, some of which are not appropriate for administration to other common nonrodent species (e.g., dogs). By presenting these data for dermal, oral, subcutaneous, and intravenous routes of administration, studies to qualify these vehicles in minipigs can be minimized or avoided. Additionally, investigators may more frequently consider using the minipig in place of higher species if the tolerability of a vehicle in the minipig is known.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research , Drug Discovery , Pharmaceutical Vehicles , Swine, Miniature , Animals , Drug Administration Routes , Excipients , Swine
5.
Gastroenterology ; 149(7): 1910-1919.e5, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26327131

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) reduces pancreatic secretion of digestive enzymes, including lipases. Oral pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) with pancreatin produces unsatisfactory results. The lipase 2 produced by the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica (YLLIP2; GenBank: AJ012632) might be used in PERT. We investigated its ability to digest triglycerides in a test meal and its efficacy in reducing fecal fat in an animal model of PEI. METHODS: YLLIP2 was produced by genetically engineered Y lipolytica and purified from culture media. YLLIP2 or other gastric (LIPF) and pancreatic (PNLIPD) lipases were added to a meal paste containing dietary triglycerides, at a range of pH values (pH 2-7), with and without pepsin or human bile and incubated at 37°C. We collected samples at various time points and measured lipase activities and stabilities. To create an animal model of PEI, steatorrhea was induced by embolization of the exocrine pancreas gland and pancreatic duct ligation in minipigs. The animals were given YLLIP2 (1, 4, 8, 40, or 80 mg/d) or pancreatin (100,000 US Pharmacopeia lipase units/d, controls) for 9 days. We then collected stool samples, measured fat levels, and calculated coefficient of fat absorption (CFA) values. RESULTS: YLLIP2 was highly stable and poorly degraded by pepsin, and had the highest activity of all lipases tested on meal triglyceride at pH 4-7 (pH 6 with bile: 94 ± 34 U/mg; pH 4 without bile: 43 ± 13 U/mg). Only gastric lipase was active and stable at pH 3, whereas YLLIP2 was sensitive to pepsin hydrolysis after pH inactivation. From in vitro test meal experiments, the lipase activity of YLLIP2 (10 mg) was estimated to be equivalent to that of pancreatin (1200 mg; 100,000 US Pharmacopeia units) at pH 6. In PEI minipigs, CFA values increased from 60.1% ± 9.3% before surgery to 90.5% ± 3.2% after administration of 1200 mg pancreatin (P < .05); CFA values increased to a range of 84.6% ± 3.0% to 90.0% ± 3.8% after administration of 4-80 mg YLLIP2 (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The yeast lipase YLLIP2 is stable and has high levels of activity against test meal triglycerides in a large pH range, with and without bile. Oral administration of milligram amounts of YLLIP2 significantly increased CFA values, similar to that of 1.2 g pancreatin, in a minipig model of PEI.


Subject(s)
Carboxylic Ester Hydrolases/pharmacology , Enzyme Replacement Therapy , Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency/drug therapy , Fungal Proteins/pharmacology , Intestinal Absorption/drug effects , Lipase/pharmacology , Lipolysis/drug effects , Triglycerides/metabolism , Yarrowia/enzymology , Administration, Oral , Animals , Carboxylic Ester Hydrolases/biosynthesis , Carboxylic Ester Hydrolases/genetics , Carboxylic Ester Hydrolases/isolation & purification , Disease Models, Animal , Dogs , Enzyme Stability , Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency/enzymology , Feces/chemistry , Fungal Proteins/biosynthesis , Fungal Proteins/genetics , Fungal Proteins/isolation & purification , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Lipase/biosynthesis , Lipase/genetics , Lipase/isolation & purification , Pancreatin/pharmacology , Pepsin A/metabolism , Recombinant Proteins/pharmacology , Swine , Swine, Miniature , Time Factors , Triglycerides/administration & dosage , Yarrowia/genetics
6.
Shock ; 39(6): 533-8, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23429645

ABSTRACT

Selepressin is a new selective vasopressin V1a agonist for treatment of vasodilatory hypotension in shock. Its effect on coronary and aortic blood flow, hemodynamics, and electrocardiogram as an indication of drug safety in healthy dogs was compared with arginine vasopressin (AVP). Eight dogs were fasted, anesthetized, intubated, and ventilated. Following thoracotomy, coronary and aortic blood flows were monitored, left ventricular and peripheral arterial blood pressures were measured, and electrocardiogram was recorded. Selepressin or AVP was administered by dose-escalating infusions (1-300, 0.3-100 ng · kg(-1) · min(-1), respectively). Drug formulation analysis and plasma bioanalysis confirmed exposure. For each dose level, hemodynamic parameters, drug potency, and efficacy were determined. Selepressin and AVP induced a similar increase in mean blood pressure (+13% to 18%), a moderate decrease in aortic blood flow (-40% to 45%), and a slight decrease in coronary blood flow (-16% to 22%). These vasopressors displayed similar hemodynamic characteristics, with peripheral vasoconstriction and decreased aortic blood flow being more pronounced than the increase in coronary resistance and decrease in coronary blood flow. Importantly, selepressin bore no relevant coronary ischemic liability, suggesting that V1a receptor agonists are a potential pharmacological target for treatment of vasodilatory hypotension in shock.


Subject(s)
Hemodynamics/drug effects , Receptors, Vasopressin/agonists , Vasoconstrictor Agents/pharmacology , Vasopressins/pharmacology , Animals , Aorta/physiology , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Blood Pressure/physiology , Coronary Circulation/drug effects , Coronary Circulation/physiology , Dogs , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical/methods , Male , Regional Blood Flow/drug effects , Regional Blood Flow/physiology , Vasoconstrictor Agents/administration & dosage , Vasoconstrictor Agents/blood , Vasopressins/administration & dosage , Vasopressins/blood
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...