Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Vojnosanit Pregl ; 74(1): 69-77, 2017 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29350895

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Religious needs of patients are consistently being neglected in the clinical medicine. Pastoral care is a religious support which a religious patient receives from priests, chaplains, imams, rabbis or other religious authorities. Religious support, in terms of clinical medicine, is a spiritual support which religious patients obtain from religious and trained medical workers. The aim of this report was to present the effects of pastoral care and religious support in hospital treatment of a 73-year-old patient with the severe form of osteoarthritis. Case report: The 73- year-old, highly religious patient with severe form of osteoarthritis was admitted at the Clinic for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Military Medical Academy in Belgrade, due to heterogeneous problems in the activities of daily living. The patient walked with difficulty using a stick, suffered pain, and was anxious and depressive. In order to objectively demonstrate effects of both pastoral care and religious support in this patient we performed multiple treatment with reversal design, in which the basic treatment consisting of hospital care, pharmacotherapy and physical therapy (the treatment A) was alternatively changed with the treatment that included combination of the basic treatment and religious support provided by religious physiatrist and physiotherapist (the treatment B) or combination of the basic treatment and pastoral care provided by military priest (the treatment C). The treatment A was applied three times and lasted two weeks, every time. Treatments B and C were applied once and lasted three weeks, each. The order of the treatments was: A→B→A→C→A. During the whole treatment period the patient's condition was assessed by several measuring scale: the level of depression by The Hamilton Rang Scale for Depression and The Zung Self Rating Depression Scale; the level of anxiety by The Zung Self Rating Anxiety Scale; the functional capability of patient by The Barthel Index and The Functional Independent Measure. Measuring was carried out on a daily basis. In statistical analysis two nonparametric statistic were used: the percentage of non-overlapping data (PND) and the percentage of data points exceeding the median (PEM). PND and PEM values below 0.7 reflect questionable effectiveness of the treatment. The values between 0.7 and 0.9 reflect moderate effects. The values above 0.9 are considered as a highly effective treatment. The anxiety of the patient was moderately to significantly reduced after introducing religious support (treatment B: mean and mean deviation = 50.1 ± 10.89; variability = 4.598653; mean shift = 0.219626; PND = 0.6; PEM = 0.9) and pastoral care (treatment C: mean and mean deviation = 53.5 ± 5.90; variability = 9.062591; mean shift = 0.207407; PND = 0.9; PEM = 0.9). The patient's depression was reduced after introducing pastoral care (treatment C: mean and mean deviation = 51.3 ± 4.66; variability = 10.99005; mean shift = 0.08881; PND = 0; PEM = 0.9). On the contrary, the patient's functional capability was not significantly improved. Conclusion: In the highly religious patient with severe osteoarthritis pastoral care and religious support, applied along with the standard medical treatment of this condition, produced some beneficial effects on anxiety and depressive mood, but with no significant effect on patient's functional capability.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/therapy , Depression/therapy , Osteoarthritis/therapy , Pastoral Care , Religion and Medicine , Activities of Daily Living , Affect , Aged , Anxiety/diagnosis , Anxiety/psychology , Combined Modality Therapy , Cost of Illness , Depression/diagnosis , Depression/psychology , Female , Health Status , Humans , Mobility Limitation , Osteoarthritis/diagnosis , Osteoarthritis/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis/psychology , Patient Care Team , Quality of Life , Recovery of Function , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
2.
Vojnosanit Pregl ; 67(12): 998-1002, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21417103

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In countries without a national organization for retrieval and distribution of organs of the deceased donors, problem of organ shortage is still not resolved. In order to increase the number of kidney transplantations we started with the program of living unrelated - spousal donors. The aim of this study was to compare treatment outcome and renal graft function in patients receiving the graft from spousal and those receiving ghe graft from living related donors. METHOD: We retrospectively identified 14 patients who received renal allograft from spousal donors between 1996 and 2009 (group I). The control group consisted of 14 patients who got graft from related donor retrieved from the database and matched than with respect to sex, age, kidney disease, immunological and viral pretransplant status, the initial method of the end stage renal disease treatment and ABO compatibility. In the follow-up period of 41 +/- 38 months we recorded immunosuppressive therapy, surgical complications, episodes of acute rejection, CMV infection and graft function, assessed by serum creatinine levels at the beginning and in the end of the follow-up period. All patients had pretransplant negative cross-match. In ABO incompatible patients pretransplant isoagglutinine titer was zero. RESULTS: The patients with a spousal donor had worse HLA matching. There were no significant differences between the groups in surgical, infective, immunological complications and graft function. Two patients from the group I returned to hemodialysis after 82 and 22 months due to serious comorbidities. CONCLUSION: In spite of the worse HLA matching, graft survival and function of renal grafts from spousal donors were as good as those retrieved from related donors.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation , Living Donors , Spouses , Female , Histocompatibility , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...