ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to assess the inappropriateness rate of oncological follow-up CT examinations. METHODS: Out of 7.000 oncology patients referred for follow-up CT examinations between March and October 2022, a random sample of 10 % was included. Radiology residents assessed the appropriateness using the Italian Society of Medical Oncology (AIOM) guidelines, supervised by senior radiologists. Association between inappropriateness and clinical variables was investigated and variables influencing inappropriateness were analyzed through a binary logistic regression. RESULTS: Three-hundred-eighty-eight examinations (56.1 %) were consistent with AIOM guidelines. An additional 100 (14.5 %) examinations did not follow the recommended schedule but were nevertheless considered appropriate because of suspected recurrence/progression (10.7 %) or adverse event requiring imaging assessment (3.8 %). Two-hundred-four (29.4 %) examinations were rated as inappropriate. Inappropriateness causes were as follows: CT not included in the relevant guideline (n = 47); CT extended to additional anatomical regions (n = 59); CT requested at a shorter time-interval (n = 98). No statistically significant difference was found in age, sex, scan region, and primary cancer between appropriate and inappropriate examinations. The only variable significantly associated with inappropriateness was being referred by a specific hospital unit named "unit 2" in the study (p = 0.009), which was demonstrated to be the only appropriateness independent predictor (OR 1.952). CONCLUSION: This study shows that majority of oncological patients referred for follow-up CT follows standard guidelines. However, a non-negligible proportion was rated as inappropriate, mainly due to the shorter time-interval. No clinical variable was associated with inappropriateness, except for referral by a specific hospital unit.
Subject(s)
Medical Oncology , Physical Examination , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Follow-Up Studies , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
In recent years, many articles have demonstrated that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be performed successfully in the study of the chest. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential role of MRI in the differentiation of benign from malignant pleural disease with a special focus on malignant pleural mesothelioma and on MRI protocols. A systematic literature search was performed to find original articles about chest MRI in patients with either benign or malignant pleural disease. We retrieved 1246 papers and 17 studies were finally identified as being in accordance with our purpose. For a morphologic assessment, T1-weighted and T2-weighted sequences were usually performed, eventually associated with T1 post-contrast sequences for better detection of pleural lesions. Functional sequences such as Diffusion Weighting Imaging (DWI), associated with the evaluation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) maps, were lately and gradually introduced in chest MRI protocols and their potentiality in differentiating benign from malignant disease has been investigated by many authors. Many progresses have been performed to improve quality images and diagnostic performances of MRI. A better and early identification of pleural disease may be obtained, providing MRI as a possible tool that can differentiate malignant from benign pleural disease without using invasive procedures.
ABSTRACT
Malignant pleural mesothelioma is a rare neoplasm with poor prognosis. CT is the first imaging technique used for diagnosis, staging, and assessment of therapy response. Although, CT has intrinsic limitations due to low soft tissue contrast and the current staging system as well as criteria for evaluating response, it does not consider the complex growth pattern of this tumor. Computer-based methods have proven their potentiality in diagnosis, staging, prognosis, and assessment of therapy response; moreover, computer-based methods can make feasible tasks like segmentation that would otherwise be impracticable. MRI, thanks to its high soft tissue contrast evaluation of contrast enhancement and through diffusion-weighted-images, could replace CT in many clinical settings.
