ABSTRACT
Development of a globally effective HIV-1 vaccine will need to encompass Nigeria, one of the hardest hit areas, with an estimated 3.2 million people living with HIV. This cross-sectional Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved study was conducted in 2009-12 at four market sites and two highway settlements sites in Nigeria to identify and characterize populations at high risk for HIV; engage support of local stakeholders; and assess the level of interest in future vaccine studies. Demographic, HIV risk data were collected by structured interviewer-administered questionnaires. Blood samples were tested on site by HIV rapid diagnostic tests, followed by rigorous confirmatory testing, subtype evaluation and testing for HBV and HCV markers in a clinical reference laboratory. Of 3229 study participants, 326 were HIV infected as confirmed by Western Blot or RNA, with a HIV prevalence of 15.4%-23.9% at highway settlements and 3.1%-9.1% at market sites. There was no observable correlation of prevalence of HIV-1 (10.1%) with HBV (10.9%) or HCV (2.9%). Major HIV-1 subtypes included CRF02_AG (37.5%); G (27.5%); G/CRF02_AG (25.9%); and non-typeable (8.9%), with 0.3% HIV-2. Univariate analysis found age, gender, marital status, level of education, and sex under substance influence as significant risk factors for HIV (p<0.001). Educating and winning the trust of local community leadership ensured high level of participation (53.3-77.9%) and willingness to participate in future studies (95%). The high HIV prevalence and high risk of HIV infection at highway settlement and mammy markets make them well suited for targeting future vaccine trials in Nigeria.
Subject(s)
AIDS Vaccines/immunology , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/immunology , HIV Infections/immunology , HIV-1/immunology , AIDS Vaccines/administration & dosage , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/prevention & control , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/virology , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/virology , HIV-1/physiology , Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Host-Pathogen Interactions/drug effects , Host-Pathogen Interactions/immunology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nigeria/epidemiology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of HAART by race/ethnicity. DESIGN: Prospective multicenter cohort study. METHODS: We studied 991 African-Americans and 911 European-Americans enrolled in the United States Military's Tri-Service AIDS Clinical Consortium Natural History Study who had dates of HIV seroconversion known within 5 years and followed between 1990 and 2002. We determined the rate of disease progression to AIDS and death for subjects in this cohort. Multivariable models evaluated race, pre-HAART (1990-1995) and HAART (1996-2002) eras, age, gender and military service. RESULTS: In the pre-HAART era, African-Americans had a statistically nonsignificant trend towards better outcomes: the relative hazards (RH) of AIDS and death for African-Americans compared to European-Americans were 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.68-1.05] and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.55-1.08), respectively. In the HAART era, outcomes were similar by race: 1.17 (95% CI, 0.86-1.61) for AIDS and 1.11 (95% CI, 0.81-1.53) for death with overlapping Kaplan-Meier curves. Relative to the pre-HAART era, the adjusted RH of AIDS in the HAART era was 0.41 (95% CI, 0.31-0.54) and 0.30 (95% CI, 0.22-0.40) for African-American and European-American participants, respectively. Analogous RH for death were 0.55 (95% CI, 0.38-0.80) and 0.38 (95% CI, 0.27-0.54). The precipitous declines in AIDS and death in the HAART era were not statistically different by race. CONCLUSIONS: : In a large multi-racial cohort with equal access to health care, HIV treatment outcomes by race/ethnicity were similar.
Subject(s)
Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/ethnology , HIV-1 , AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections/ethnology , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/ethnology , Adult , Black or African American , CD4 Lymphocyte Count , Disease Progression , Epidemiologic Methods , Female , HIV Seropositivity/ethnology , Humans , Male , Military Personnel , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology , White PeopleABSTRACT
The long-term efficacy of making resistance testing routinely available to clinicians has not been established. We conducted a clinical trial at 6 US military hospitals in which volunteers infected with human immunodeficiency virus type-1 were randomized to have routine access to phenotype resistance testing (PT arm), access to genotype resistance testing (GT arm), or no access to either test (VB arm). The primary outcome measure was time to persistent treatment failure despite change(s) in antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimen. Overall, routine access to resistance testing did not significantly increase the time to end point. Time to end point was significantly prolonged in the PT arm for subjects with a history of treatment with > or =4 different ART regimens or a history of treatment with nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors before the study, compared with that in the VB arm. These results suggest that routine access to resistance testing can improve long-term virologic outcomes in HIV-infected patients who are treatment experienced but may not impact outcome in patients who are naive to or have had limited experience with ART.
