Economic burden and secondary complications of influenza-related hospitalization among adults in the US: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe the healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and direct medical cost of influenza-related hospitalizations to illustrate the persistent economic burden of influenza among adults in the US. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the PINC AI Healthcare Database. Adults hospitalized with a diagnosis of influenza between August 1-May 31 from 2016-2023 were identified and stratified by age (18-49, 50-64 and ≥65 years). The index hospitalization was defined as the individual's first influenza-related hospitalization during each season. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and hospitalization characteristics were assessed during the index hospitalization. Index hospitalization length of stay (LOS), in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, mechanical ventilation (MV) usage, and costs were evaluated overall and by MV usage, ICU admission, and secondary complication status. Pre-index influenza-related outpatient and emergency department (ED) visits (7 days prior) were also evaluated. RESULTS: Primarily initiated in the ED, the median LOS for influenza-related hospitalizations was 3-4 days. Inpatient mortality increased with age (2.2-4.4%). Combined mean hospitalization and initial ED visit costs were $12,556-$14,494 (2017/18; high severity season) and $11,384-$12,896 (2022/23; most recent season). Compared to other age groups, adults ≥65 years had higher proportions of hospitalization with no MV or ICU usage. Adults 18-49 years had the highest proportion of ICU admission only, whereas adults 50-64 years had the highest MV usage only and both MV and ICU admission. MV and/or ICU usage was associated with higher hospitalization costs. Increasing proportionally with age, the majority of influenza-related hospitalizations had a secondary complication diagnosis, which were associated with elevated costs. LIMITATIONS: Analysis of this hospital-based administrative database relied on coding accuracy. Only hospital system-associated outpatient/ED visits were captured; the full scope of HCRU was under-ascertained. CONCLUSIONS: The economic burden of influenza-related hospitalizations remains substantial, driven by underlying conditions, MV/ICU usage and secondary complications.

This study described the healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs for US adults ≥18 years old hospitalized with influenza and associated secondary complications such as pneumonia, asthma exacerbation and malignant hypertension between 2016­2023. The researchers analyzed a hospital admission database and found that, for the healthcare system, average cost per influenza-related hospitalization ranged from $11,384 to $14,494, depending on the influenza season and age of the patient. Over 96% of patients admitted to a hospital initially presented at the emergency department, 20­30% of patients required mechanical ventilation (MV) or intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and the median hospital length of stay was 3­4 days. This study adds to the existing evidence by providing economic burden estimates for the 2022/23 influenza season, the most recent influenza season after the COVID-19 pandemic, and found slightly lower HCRU and cost for influenza hospitalizations relative to prior seasons. Also, the study comprehensively analyzed economic burden by patient age groups and found lower HCRU and costs among patients ≥65 years compared to adults 18­49 years and 50­64 years consistently for all seasons. Additionally, the study found that the proportion of patients with MV usage alone, with MV usage and an ICU admission, and average hospitalization costs were greatest among patients 50­64 years, highlighting the potential benefit of increasing rates of seasonal influenza vaccination among this age group. Finally, the study found higher costs among patients with complications related to their influenza infection compared to patients without complications. Overall, the study found that influenza-related hospitalization can contribute to substantial economic burden in the US in the most recent time period.

Estimated Effectiveness of Coadministration of the BNT162b2 BA.4/5 COVID-19 Vaccine With Influenza Vaccine.

Importance: No data comparing the estimated effectiveness of coadministering COVID-19 vaccines with seasonal influenza vaccine (SIV) in the community setting exist. Objective: To examine the comparative effectiveness associated with coadministering the BNT162b2 BA.4/5 bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (BNT162b2-biv [Pfizer BioNTech]) and SIV vs giving each vaccine alone. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective comparative effectiveness study evaluated US adults aged 18 years or older enrolled in commercial health insurance or Medicare Advantage plans and vaccinated with BNT162b2-biv only, SIV only, or both on the same day between August 31, 2022, and January 30, 2023. Individuals with monovalent or another brand of mRNA bivalent COVID-19 vaccine were excluded. Exposure: Same-day coadministration of BNT162b2-biv and SIV; receipt of BNT162b2-biv only (for COVID-19-related outcomes) or SIV only (for influenza-related outcomes) were the comparator groups. For adults aged 65 years or older, only enhanced SIVs were included. Main Outcomes and Measures: COVID-19-related and influenza-related hospitalization, emergency department (ED) or urgent care (UC) encounters, and outpatient visits. Results: Overall, 3 442 996 individuals (57.0% female; mean [SD] age, 65 [16.7] years) were included. A total of 627 735 individuals had BNT162b2-biv and SIV vaccine coadministered, 369 423 had BNT162b2-biv alone, and 2 445 838 had SIV alone. Among those aged 65 years or older (n = 2 210 493; mean [SD] age, 75 [6.7] years; 57.9% female), the coadministration group had a similar incidence of COVID-19-related hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.04; 95% CI, 0.87-1.24) and slightly higher incidence of emergency department or urgent care encounters (AHR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.02-1.23) and outpatient visits (AHR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01-1.11) compared with the BNT162b2-biv-only group. Among individuals aged 18 to 64 years (n = 1 232 503; mean [SD] age, 47 [13.1] years; 55.4% female), the incidence of COVID-19-related outcomes was slightly higher among those who received both vaccines vs BNT162b2-biv alone (AHR point estimate range, 1.14-1.57); however, fewer events overall in this age group resulted in wider CIs. Overall, compared with those who received SIV alone, the coadministration group had a slightly lower incidence of most influenza-related end points (AHR point estimates 0.83-0.93 for those aged ≥65 years vs 0.76-1.08 for those aged 18-64 years). Negative control outcomes suggested residual bias and calibration of COVID-19-related and influenza-related outcomes with negative controls moved all estimates closer to the null, with most CIs crossing 1.00. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, coadministration of BNT162b2-biv and SIV was associated with generally similar effectiveness in the community setting against COVID-19-related and SIV-related outcomes compared with giving each vaccine alone and may help improve uptake of both vaccines.