Biology is Destiny: A Case of Adrenocortical Carcinoma Diagnosed and Resected at Inception in a Patient Under Close Surveillance for Lung Cancer.

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignancy that is generally associated with a poor prognosis whose existence dictates the management of incidental renal masses. We report a case of ACC diagnosed and treated at its apparent inception in a patient undergoing close surveillance imaging of a prior malignancy. Despite timely detection and resection of a localized ACC this patient rapidly progressed to systemic disease. This case highlights the rapid growth kinetics of ACC and puts into perspective the challenges associated with the established treatment paradigm for patients diagnosed with an adrenal mass.

The radiation doses to erectile tissues defined with magnetic resonance imaging after intensity-modulated radiation therapy or iodine-125 brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: To report penile bulb (PB) and corporal bodies (CB) doses during intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and permanent (125)I prostate implant alone (BT) for favorable, early stage, clinically localized prostate cancer using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to provide a basis for comparison as the initial report of a comprehensive project to develop erectile tissues sparing techniques. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Prostate, PB and CB volumes were defined by a fused CT/MRI simulation study performed before treatment in 29 IMRT patients and verification study performed 30 days postimplant in 15 BT patients. The median prescribed prostate dose for the IMRT and BT groups was 74 Gy and 145 Gy, respectively. Dose volume histograms (DVHs) were generated to determine the dose characteristics for the PB, CB, and prostate for each patient. D(90), V(100), and V(50) were used, where D(i) was defined as the dose that covers i% of the prostate volume and V(i) is the fractional volume of the prostate that receives i% of the prescribed dose. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to evaluate significance between the groups. RESULTS: The median PB D(90), V(100), and V(50) values were 17.5 Gy, 0%, and 31.9% for the IMRT group; and 52.5 Gy, 21.5%, and 89.7% for the BT group. The median CB D(90), V(100), and V(50) values were 7.3 Gy, 0%, and 0.9% for the IMRT group; and 26.9 Gy, 2.4%, and 20.1% for the BT group. The differences between the IMRT vs. BT V(100) values, but not V(50), were statistically significant for the PB (p = 0.001) and CB (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Radiation dose to the PB and CB is low with IMRT or BT. Magnetic resonance imaging is superior to CT for the imaging of erectile tissues. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy may offer further reductions in the doses received by the PB and CB; however, at what cost to prostate coverage and normal tissue sparing will be the subject of a follow-up study.

Hepatic MR imaging with ferumoxides: multicenter study of safety and effectiveness of direct injection protocol.

PURPOSE: To compare the safety and effectiveness of an undiluted direct injection of ferumoxides with those of a diluted slow infusion of ferumoxides during 30 minutes in patients with known liver lesions or in those suspected of having them. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred thirty-three patients at 16 institutions were randomized to receive either an undiluted direct injection of 0.56 mg of iron per kilogram of body weight of ferumoxides administered during 2 minutes (2 mL/min) or a diluted slow infusion administered during 30 minutes. Safety was assessed with monitoring for adverse events and laboratory tests. For sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy analysis, two independent blinded observers identified and classified lesions as benign or malignant with precontrast images and with pre- and postcontrast images combined. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in adverse events in the group with direct injection compared with those in the group with infusion (21 [18%] of 114 patients vs 19 [17%] of 112 patients, respectively). No serious adverse events were observed. The most common adverse events in the group with direct injection versus the group with infusion were headache (five [4%] of 114 vs three [3%] of 112, respectively) and back pain (five [4%] of 114 vs three [3%] of 112, respectively). Overall, in 68 (62%) of 109 patients with direct injection and 71 (66%) of 108 patients with infusion, additional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging information was obtained after ferumoxides administration (P =.67). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the diagnosis of malignancy were significantly improved by adding images obtained after ferumoxides administration to the images obtained before contrast agent administration (P <.05 for all comparisons). CONCLUSION: Direct injection of ferumoxides has safety and effectiveness profiles similar to those of slow infusion of the agent. Further findings indicate that the addition of ferumoxides increases the sensitivity and specificity of hepatic MR evaluation when compared with unenhanced MR imaging.

Measurement of intrafractional prostate motion using magnetic resonance imaging.

PURPOSE: To quantify the three-dimensional intrafractional prostate motion over typical treatment time intervals with cine-magnetic resonance imaging (cine MRI) studies. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-two patients with prostate cancer were scanned supine in an alpha cradle cast using cine MRI. Twenty sequential slices were acquired in the sagittal and axial planes through the center of the prostate. Each scan took approximately 9 min. The posterior, lateral, and superior edges of the prostate were tracked on each frame relative to the initial prostate position, and the size and duration of each displacement was recorded. RESULTS: The prostate displacements were (mean +/- SD): 0.2 +/- 2.9 mm, 0.0 +/- 3.4 mm, and 0.0 +/- 1.5 mm in the anterior-posterior, superior-inferior, and medial-lateral dimensions respectively. The prostate motion appeared to have been driven by peristalsis in the rectum. Large displacements of the prostate (up to 1.2 cm) moved the prostate both anteriorly and superiorly and in some cases compressed the organ. For such motions, the prostate did not stay displaced, but moved back to its original position. To account for the dosimetric consequences of the motion, we also calculated the time-averaged displacement to be approximately 1 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Cine MRI can be used to measure intrafractional prostate motion. Although intrafractional prostate motions occur, their effects are negligible compared to interfractional motion and setup error. No adjustment in margin is necessary for three-dimensional conformal or intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

MRI simulation: effect of gradient distortions on three-dimensional prostate cancer plans.

PURPOSE: To quantify the dosimetric consequences of external patient contour distortions produced on low-field and high-field MRIs for external beam radiation of prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A linearity phantom consisting of a grid filled with contrast material was scanned on a spiral CT, a 0.23 T open MRI, and a 1.5 T closed bore system. Subsequently, 12 patients with prostate cancer were scanned on CT and the open MRI. A gradient distortion correction (GDC) program was used to postprocess the MRI images. Eight of the patients were also scanned on the 1.5 T MRI with integrated GDC correction. All data sets were fused according to their bony landmarks using a chamfer-matching algorithm. The prostate volume was contoured on an MRI image, irrespective of the apparent prostate location in those sets. Thus, the same target volume was planned and used for calculating the anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral separations. The number of monitor units required for treatment using a four-field conformal technique was compared. Because there are also setup variations in patient outer contours, two different CT scans from 20 different patients were fused, and the differences in AP and lateral separations were measured to obtain an estimate of the mean interfractional separation variation. RESULTS: All AP separations measured on MRI were statistically indistinguishable from those on CT within the interfractional separation variations. The mean differences between CT and low-field MRI and CT and high-field MRI lateral separations were 1.6 cm and 0.7 cm, respectively, and were statistically significantly different from zero. However, after the GDC was applied to the low-field images, the difference became 0.4 +/- 0.4 mm (mean +/- standard deviation), which was statistically insignificant from the CT-to-CT variations. The mean variations in the lateral separations from the low-field images with GDC would result in a dosimetric difference of <1%, assuming an equally weighted four-field 18-MV technique for patient separations up to approximately 40 cm. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with lateral separations <40 cm, a homogeneous calculation simulated using a 1.5 T MRI or a 0.23 T MRI with a gradient distortion correction will yield a monitor unit calculation indistinguishable from that generated using CT simulation.