Palliative Care Professional Development for Critical Care Nurses: A Multicenter Program.

BACKGROUND: Integrating palliative care into intensive care units (ICUs) requires involvement of bedside nurses, who report inadequate education in palliative care. OBJECTIVE: To implement and evaluate a palliative care professional development program for ICU bedside nurses. METHODS: From May 2013 to January 2015, palliative care advanced practice nurses and nurse educators in 5 academic medical centers completed a 3-day train-the-trainer program followed by 2 years of mentoring to implement the initiative. The program consisted of 8-hour communication workshops for bedside nurses and structured rounds in ICUs, where nurse leaders coached bedside nurses in identifying and addressing palliative care needs. Primary outcomes were nurses' ratings of their palliative care communication skills in surveys, and nurses' identification of palliative care needs during coaching rounds. RESULTS: Each center held at least 6 workshops, training 428 bedside nurses. Nurses rated their skill level higher after the workshop for 15 tasks (eg, responding to family distress, ensuring families understand information in family meetings, all P < .01 vs preworkshop). Coaching rounds in each ICU took a mean of 3 hours per month. For 82% of 1110 patients discussed in rounds, bedside nurses identified palliative care needs and created plans to address them. CONCLUSIONS: Communication skills training workshops increased nurses' ratings of their palliative care communication skills. Coaching rounds supported nurses in identifying and addressing palliative care needs.

A Typology of ICU Patients and Families from the Clinician Perspective: Toward Improving Communication.

This paper presents an exploratory case study of clinician-patient communications in a specific clinical environment. It describes how intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians' technical and social categorizations of patients and families shape the flow of communication in these acute care settings. Drawing on evidence from a year-long ethnographic study of four ICUs, we develop a typology of patients and families as viewed by the clinicians who care for them. Each type, or category, of patient is associated with differing communication strategies, with compliant patients and families engaged in greater depth. In an era that prioritizes patient engagement through communication for all patients, our findings suggest that ICU teams need to develop new strategies for engaging and communicating with not just compliant patients and families, but those who are difficult as well. We discuss innovative methods for developing such strategies.

Communicating with Patients' Families and Physicians About Prognosis and Goals of Care.

BACKGROUND: Integrating palliative care into intensive care requires active involvement of bedside nurses in discussions of patients' prognosis and goals of care. OBJECTIVE: To improve critical care nurses' skills and confidence to engage in discussions with patients' families and physicians about prognosis and goals of care by using a focused educational intervention. METHODS: An 8-hour-long workshop was developed for critical care nurses. Key roles and skills of nurses in communication about prognosis and goals of care were defined. Participants practiced skills during facilitated role-plays. A reflection session addressed burnout, distress, and self-care. Participants completed surveys before, immediately after, and 3 months after their workshop, rating their confidence and skill in performing key tasks. Use of a participant focus group and open-response items in the surveys further elucidated the impact of the workshop. RESULTS: Between March 2011 and April 2013, a total of 82 critical care nurses completed a workshop. Compared with before the workshop, after the workshop, nurses reported greater skill and confidence for 14 survey items (P < .001), including assessing families' understanding of prognosis and goals of care, addressing families' emotional needs, and contributing to family meetings. Increases were sustained 3 months after the workshop. CONCLUSION: Defining roles and providing opportunities for skills practice and reflection can enhance nurses' confidence to engage in discussions about prognosis and goals of care.

Additional Evidence for the Long-Term Benefits of Pulmonary Rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary rehabilitation programs document outcomes to prepare for program certification, to demonstrate the value of the program to upper management, and to provide feedback to pulmonary rehabilitation staff regarding the efficacy of the program. The overall goal of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using non-research-generated clinical data to report long-term outcomes following a pulmonary rehabilitation program. METHODS: Using a longitudinal descriptive design, all subjects who completed pulmonary rehabilitation at one community-based pulmonary rehabilitation program in the San Francisco Bay Area were asked to complete a 6-month and subsequent yearly questionnaires. Adherence to pulmonary rehabilitation techniques was described for 7 y following pulmonary rehabilitation participation, health-care utilization from 1 y before pulmonary rehabilitation was compared with subsequent years, and health-care utilization was compared between those who participated in ongoing regular exercise after pulmonary rehabilitation and those who did not exercise. RESULTS: More than 70% of subjects who completed the questionnaire reported adherence to pulmonary rehabilitation techniques, including exercise for at least 7 y following pulmonary rehabilitation. Health-care utilization declined after pulmonary rehabilitation. Subjects who did not exercise regularly required significantly more health care than those who exercised regularly (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the ability of one pulmonary rehabilitation program to accurately monitor extended long-term follow-up after pulmonary rehabilitation. Implementing this long-term monitoring methodology consistently in pulmonary rehabilitation programs could contribute to evaluation of the comparative effectiveness of various treatment options.