Semi-elemental diet is effective in managing high output ileostomy; a case report.

A notable proportion of surgically created stomas develop high output. Ongoing monitoring and treatment of hight stoma output is imperative to avoid risk of complications. Prevailing management guidelines focus mainly on supportive measures and medications that alter bowel motility. However, some patients fail to respond to these measures, leaving few substitutes. This report documents the use of semi-elemental diet in the management of a high-output ileostomy case. A 58-year-old patient underwent multiple bowel resections that resulted in a small intestine measuring 90 cm, with an end ileostomy being performed. He was on home parenteral nutrition (HPN) for over 9 years and was admitted to the hospital with an episode of sepsis from an infected line. One day prior to the hospital admission, the stoma was producing 7.2 litres/day. The Patient was advised to start Vital 1.5 10-15/day (2.5-3 litres/day) exclusively, in addition to his 1.5 litres of IV fluid, based on the nutritional requirement as calculated by a dietitian. Following the introduction of the semi-elemental diet, the ileostomy output dropped swiftly to 2 litres/day, 9 days post admission, and the BMI remained stable. This report suggests a possible role for semi-elemental diet in the management of ileostomies with short bowel syndrome. Based on our previous experience and this case, elemental or semi-elemental diet may both be used as a mono-therapy, in patients with high ileostomy output, even in cases with small bowel length as short as 90cm.

The relationship between perceived injustice and the working alliance: a cross-sectional study of patients with persistent pain attending multidisciplinary rehabilitation.

PURPOSE: Accumulating research suggests that perceived injustice is a risk factor for adverse recovery following painful injury. Presently, however, little is known about the processes by which perceived injustice influences rehabilitation outcomes. It is plausible that perceived injustice and associated anger impact rehabilitation outcomes by compromising the quality of the therapeutic working alliance; however, research has not previously examined the relationship between perceived injustice and the working alliance. Therefore, the present study investigated the association between perceived injustice, anger, and the working alliance. METHODS: Sixty-six patients with persistent pain following musculoskeletal injury participated in this study. All participants were enrolled in a standardized multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme. Participants completed self-report measures of perceived injustice, pain intensity, disability, anger intensity and regulation style, depressive symptoms, and a measure of the working alliance with their principal rehabilitation clinician. Each participant's principal clinician also completed the working alliance measure. RESULTS: Greater perceptions of injustice were associated with poorer client ratings of the working alliance. Results also showed that anger expression mediated the association between perceived injustice and the working alliance. CONCLUSION: Strategies to enhance the working alliance between rehabilitation professionals and clients with elevated levels of perceived injustice are needed. Implications for Rehabilitation Perceived injustice is associated with poor progress in rehabilitation programmes for people with musculoskeletal pain following injury. Perceived injustice is negatively associated with the quality of the therapeutic working alliance. Strategies to enhance the working alliance between rehabilitation professionals and clients with elevated levels of perceived injustice are needed.

Expectancies Mediate the Relations Among Pain Catastrophizing, Fear of Movement, and Return to Work Outcomes After Whiplash Injury.

UNLABELLED: Pain catastrophizing and fear of movement have been identified as key predictors of prolonged work disability after whiplash injury. However, little is known about the processes by which pain catastrophizing and fear of movement affect return to work. This study investigated the mediating role of expectancies on the relations between pain catastrophizing and return to work, and between fear of movement and return to work after whiplash injury. The study sample consisted of 154 individuals with whiplash injury who were enrolled in a multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation program. Participants completed measures of pain catastrophizing, fear of movement, and return-to-work expectancies after admission to a rehabilitation program. A follow-up telephone interview was used to assess work status 1 year after discharge. Consistent with previous research, analyses revealed that expectancies, pain catastrophizing, and fear of movement were significant predictors of return to work at 1-year follow-up. Regression analyses (bootstrapping) revealed that expectancies partially mediated the relation between catastrophizing and return to work. Expectancies completely mediated the relation between fear of movement and return to work. The significant predictive and mediating role of expectancies on return to work argues for the inclusion of expectancies as a specific target of intervention for individuals with whiplash injury. PERSPECTIVE: The findings suggest that expectancies might be part of the pathways by which pain catastrophizing and fear of movement affect return-to-work outcomes after whiplash injury. The findings argue for greater attention to return-to-work expectancies as a risk factor for problematic recovery outcomes as well as a target of intervention.

Barriers to change in depressive symptoms after multidisciplinary rehabilitation for whiplash: the role of perceived injustice.

OBJECTIVE: Depressive symptoms complicate patients' recovery after musculoskeletal injury. There is strong evidence to support the utility of multidisciplinary approaches for treating comorbid pain and depressive symptoms. Despite this, a significant proportion of patients may not experience meaningful reductions in depressive symptoms following intervention. The purpose of this study was to identify barriers to change in depressive symptom during multidisciplinary rehabilitation for patients with whiplash injuries. METHODS: A total of 53 patients with clinically meaningful levels of depressive symptoms before participating in a standardized multidisciplinary rehabilitation program participated in this study. Patients completed self-report measures of depressive symptoms, demographic factors, pain intensity, disability, posttraumatic stress symptoms, pain catastrophizing, perceived injustice, and self-efficacy upon commencement and completion of the rehabilitation program. Analyses examined whether pretreatment variables predicted change in depressive symptoms over treatment and the maintenance of clinically meaningful levels of depressive symptoms at posttreatment. RESULTS: Duration of work absence and perceived injustice were significant unique predictors of percent change in depressive symptoms in a linear regression analysis. Perceived injustice was the only significant unique predictor of the presence of clinically meaningful levels of depressive symptoms at posttreatment in a logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the identification of patients with high levels of perceived injustice and implementation of targeted interventions for these patients might contribute to greater improvements in their depressive symptomatology.

Further validation of a measure of injury-related injustice perceptions to identify risk for occupational disability: a prospective study of individuals with whiplash injury.

PURPOSE: Emerging evidence suggests that perceptions of injustice negatively impact return to work following whiplash injury. The Injustice Experiences Questionnaire (IEQ) is a recently developed measurement tool that may be used to assess injury-related perceptions of injustice following injury. To date, although research has supported the predictive validity of the IEQ, a clinical cut off for interpreting this measure has not been established. Increased support for the validity and clinical interpretation of the IEQ represents a first step towards identifying patients that might benefit from targeted intervention to mitigate the impact of perceived injustice. METHODS: The IEQ was completed by 103 whiplash-injured patients upon commencement and completion of a standardized multidisciplinary rehabilitation program. One year later, individuals reported on their employment activity, pain severity, and use of narcotics. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to identify the post-treatment IEQ score that was optimally associated with unemployment status at the follow-up. Secondary ROC curve analyses examined IEQ scores best associated with high pain severity and narcotic use 1 year following treatment. RESULTS: Results indicated that IEQ scores significantly discriminated individuals who returned and did not return to work at the follow-up. An IEQ score of 19 optimally identified participants in terms of follow-up employment status. IEQ scores at the end of treatment also discriminated individuals with high and low pain severity ratings and narcotic use status at the follow-up. Post-treatment IEQ scores of 18 and 20 optimally identified participants who had high pain severity ratings and who were using narcotics at the follow-up, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results further support the validity of the IEQ and provide a guideline for its clinical interpretation in patients with persistent pain and disability following musculoskeletal injury. IEQ scores above the identified cut off may represent a barrier to work return and may warrant targeted intervention.

Pain, perceived injustice and the persistence of post-traumatic stress symptoms during the course of rehabilitation for whiplash injuries.

The present study assessed the role of pain and pain-related psychological variables in the persistence of post-traumatic stress symptoms following whiplash injury. Individuals (N=112) with whiplash injuries who had been admitted to a standardized multidisciplinary rehabilitation program were asked to complete measures of pain, post-traumatic stress symptoms, physical function and pain-related psychological variables at three different points during their treatment program. The findings are consistent with previous research showing that indicators of injury severity such as pain, reduced function and disability, and scores on pain-related psychological were associated with more severe post-traumatic stress symptoms in individuals with whiplash injuries. Contrary to expectations, indicators of pain severity did not contribute to the persistence of post-traumatic stress symptoms. Univariate analyses revealed that self-reported disability, pain catastrophizing and perceived injustice were significant determinants of the persistence of post-traumatic stress symptoms. In multivariate analyses, only perceived injustice emerged as a unique predictor of the persistence of post-traumatic stress symptoms. The results suggest that early adequate management of pain symptoms and disability consequent to whiplash injury might reduce the severity of post-traumatic stress symptoms. The development of effective intervention techniques for targeting perceptions of injustice might be important for promoting recovery of post-traumatic stress symptoms consequent to whiplash injury.