[Improving operating room efficiency: an observational and multidimensional approach in the San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome]. / Miglioramento dell'efficienza nel blocco operatorio: uno studio osservazionale e multidimensionale nell'Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini di Roma.

AIM: The management of operating rooms (ORs) is a complex process which requires an effective organizational scheme. In order to amore convinient allocation of resources a rigorous monitoring plan is needed to ensure operating rooms performances. All the necessary actions should be taken to improve the quality of the planning and scheduling procedure. METHODS: Between April-December, 2016 an organizational analysis has been carried out on the performances of the A.O. S. Camillo-Forlanini Hospital Operating Block applying the "process management" approach to the ORs efficiency. The project involved two different surgical areas of the same operating block the multi-specialist and elective surgery and cardio-vascular surgery . The analyses of the processes was made through the product, patient and safety approach and from different points of view: the "asis", process and stakeholder perspectives. Descriptive statistics was used to process raw data and Student's t-distribution was used to assess the difference between the two means (significant p value ˂0,05). The Coefficient of Variation (CV) was used to describe the variabilityamong data. RESULTS: The asis approach allowed us to describe the ORs inbound activities. For both operating block the most demanding weekly commitments in terms of time turned out to be the inventory management procedures of controlling and stocking medicines, general medical supplies and instruments (130[DS=±14] for BOE and 30[DS=±18] for CCH. The average time spent on preparing the operating room, separately calculated starting from the first surgical case, was of 27 minutes (SD=± 17) while for the following surgical procedures preparation time decreased to 15 minutes (SD= ± 10), which highlighted a meaningful difference of 12 minutes. A great variability was registered in CCH due to the unpredictability of these operations (CV 82%). The stakeholders' perspective revealed a reasonable level of satisfaction among nurses and surgeons (2.9 vs 2.3, respectively) and in anesthesiologist (2.8-BOE vs 2.4 CCH).Being brought to the surgical suite from an "external Unit" seems to have negatively influenced the patient's perception: preparation time turned out to be significantly lower for CCH patients rather than BOE ones (p˂0,001).The results of the safety procedure approach highlighted a moderate criticality in terms of cleaning up time and delay in the starting time of the first surgical case. CONCLUSION: More effort should be made to avoid any slowdown during the whole process. It is advisable to implement a lean system that may improve efficiency and quality of the service to reduce wastes and unproductive times. This would inevitably generate a more positive outcomes.