Influence of Gender, Body Mass Index, and Age on the Pharmacokinetics of Itraconazole in Healthy Subjects: Non-Compartmental Versus Compartmental Analysis.

Itraconazole is a triazole antifungal agent with highly variable pharmacokinetics, with not yet fully identified factors as the source of this variability. Our study aimed to examine the influence of body mass index, gender, and age on the first dose pharmacokinetics of itraconazole in healthy subjects, using pharmacokinetic modeling, non-compartmental versus compartmental ones. A total of 114 itraconazole and hydroxy-itraconazole sets of plasma concentrations of healthy subjects of both genders, determined using a validated liquid chromatographic method with mass spectrometric detection (LC-MS), were obtained for pharmacokinetic analyses performed by the computer program Kinetica 5®. Genetic polymorphism in CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP1A1, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19 was analyzed using PCR-based methods. Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that gender had a significant effect on AUC as the most important pharmacokinetics endpoint, whereas body mass index and age did not show such an influence. Therefore, further analysis considered gender and indicated that both geometric mean values of itraconazole and hydroxy-itraconazole plasma concentrations in men were prominently higher than those in women. A significant reduction of the geometric mean values of Cmax and AUC and increment of Vd in females compared with males were obtained. Analyzed genotypes and gender differences in drug pharmacokinetics could not be related. Non-compartmental and one-compartmental models complemented each other, whereas the application of the two-compartmental model showed a significant correlation with the analysis of one compartment. They indicated a significant influence of gender on itraconazole pharmacokinetics after administration of the single oral dose of the drug, given under fed conditions. Women were less exposed to itraconazole and hydroxy-itraconazole than men due to poorer absorption of itraconazole, its more intense pre-systemic metabolism, and higher distribution of both drug and its metabolite.

An overview of antiviral strategies for coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection with special reference to antimalarial drugs chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine.

At present, neither specific antiviral drugs, nor vaccine is recommended for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treatment. In this review we discuss the drugs suggested as therapy for COVID-19 infection, with a focus on chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine. The list of drugs used for COVID-19 treatment includes a combination of lopinavir and ritonavir, remdesivir, favipiravir, alpha-interferon, ribavirin, atazanavir, umifenovir, and tocilizumab. As their efficacy and safety are under investigation, none of the regulatory agencies approved them for the treatment of COVID-19 infection. Although chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine possess antiviral and immunomodulatory effects, in practice benefit of their use for COVID-19 treatment is controversial. Several studies investigating hydroxychloroquine were stopped and the French national medicines regulator suspended its use in clinical trials because of safety concerns. The results from the double-blind, randomised clinical trials, including large number of participants, will add better insight into the role of these two drugs as already available and affordable, antimalarial therapy. The ethical issue on emergency use of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine in the settings of COVID-19 should be carefully managed, with adherence to the "monitored emergency use of unregistered and experimental interventions" (MEURI) framework or be ethically approved as a trial, as stated by the WHO. Potential shortage of chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine on the market can be overbridged with regular prescriptions by medical doctors and national drug agency should ensure sufficient quantities of these drugs for standard indications.

Anesthesia for patients with psychiatric illnesses: a narrative review with emphasis on preoperative assessment and postoperative recovery and pain.

The physical and psychological fragility of patients with psychiatric illness poses critical importance in the preoperative assessment, evaluation, and choice of premedication, which includes regular therapy, as well as concerns about polypharmacy with possible interactions of anesthetics, analgesics, and psychiatric medications. A considerable effort is to reduce risks for exacerbations or relapses of imminent illness in the postoperative period. In this narrative review, the goal was also set towards the use of proper tools for the preoperative assessment of anxiety and management of postoperative pain. Indeed anxiety can be a manifestation of primary comorbidity within the spectrum of a major psychiatric condition and affects dramatically the presentations of other symptoms as well evolution. Pain perception is changed in patients with psychiatric illness; therefore, the postoperative bundle of measures including assessment of pain using tools adjusted to the patient's cognitive state and regular nonopioid analgesics is important aiming to minimize opioid use. Ketamine, esketamine, xenon, nitrous oxide, dexmedetomidine, and propofol seem to have a novel role and benefit the management of certain types of psychiatric illness during the perioperative period. Psychiatrist involvement is necessary throughout the perioperative period, starting preoperatively and continuing after discharge. Clinical pharmacologists should be part of the team during the management of critically ill patients when polypharmacy can cause undesirable effects. Psychosocial wellbeing of surgical patients with psychiatric co-morbidity depends deeply on the collaboration of medical staff, family, and friends and international guidelines aim to establish standards, including but not limited to postoperative management.

Metamizole Utilization and Expenditure During 6-Year Period: Serbia vs. Croatia.

Background: Metamizole is a medication with analgesic, antipyretic, spasmolytic, and weak anti-inflammatory effects. The aim of our study was to evaluate a six-year trend in the utilization and expenditure of metamizole in comparison to other group of licensed non-opioid analgesics in Serbia and Croatia, in order to rationalize its use and prescribing in these countries. Methods: The data of metamizole vs. all other non-opioid analgesics utilization and expenditure in Serbia and Croatia was analyzed according to the WHO methodology and expressed as defined daily doses per 1,000 inhabitants per day (DDD/1,000 inhabitants/per day) and total costs, respectively, during the 6-year period from 2010 to 2015. Results: In the observed period, utilization of metamizole was 3.31 fold higher in Serbia than in Croatia (median in Serbia was 2.238 vs. 0.675 in Croatia DDD/1,000 inhabitants/per day/per year). Expenditure of metamizole in the same period was 5.29-fold higher in Serbia than in Croatia (median in Serbia was 1,738,192.51 €/per year vs. 328,355.03 €/per year in Croatia). Conclusion: Utilization and expenditure of non-opioid analgesics, including metamizole, in Serbia was significantly higher comparing with Croatia.Further research is needed to determine whether the current analgesic consumption in Serbia meets the needs of the patient. The benefits of metamizole should be weighed against the risk of metamizole-induced adverse effects. Until then, its prescribing should be based on indications and the appropriate duration of therapy.