Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Pharm Pract ; : 8971900241228779, 2024 Jan 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38241183

ABSTRACT

Background: Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) is indicated for vitamin K antagonist (VKA) reversal but is associated with thrombotic events (TE). In 2018, the institution revised 4F-PCC dosing for VKA reversal from INR and weight-based dosing to a fixed-dose of 1500 units. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare hemostatic efficacy and TE rate of fixed-dose 4PCC to weight-based dosing. Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center, quasi-experimental study of adult patients who received 4F-PCC for VKA reversal from January 2014 through May 2016 (INR and weight-based dosing) or April through October 2018 (fixed-dosing). The primary endpoint was hemostatic efficacy, defined by achieving an INR of ≤1.4, or an INR of ≤1.7 with evidence of hemostasis. The key secondary endpoint was TE within 14 days of 4F-PCC administration. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-squared for nominal data and Mann-Whitney U for ordinal and continuous data. Results: The study included 163 patients who received weight-based dosing and 45 who received fixed-dose 4F-PCC. Hemostatic efficacy was 76.9% of patients in the weight-based group and 77.4% of patients in the fixed-dose group (P = .229). TE occurred in 13.5% of the weight-based vs 6.7% of the fixed-dose group (P = .181). Conclusion: This study found no difference in hemostatic efficacy with fixed-dose 4F-PCC for VKA reversal compared to INR and weight-based dosing. The occurrence of TE was reduced by 50% with the 4F-PCC fixed-dose strategy; however, this difference was not statistically significant. Further randomized studies are needed to confirm these results.

2.
J Intensive Care Med ; 38(10): 911-916, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37078093

ABSTRACT

Background: Various studies have demonstrated the incidence of hyponatremia in patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, to our knowledge, no study has assessed the difference in the incidence of hyponatremia in patients with and without COVID-19. Purpose: To compare the incidence of hyponatremia in patients requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission with and without COVID-19 infection. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients with a diagnosis of pneumonia from February 2019 to January 2020, or a diagnosis of COVID-19 from June 2020 to May 2021. Included patients were matched on age and sex. The primary outcome was the incidence of hyponatremia within 72 h of admission. Secondary endpoints collected included severity of hyponatremia, symptomatic hyponatremia, and lowest serum sodium. Results: There were 99 and 104 patients included in pneumonia and COVID-19 arms, respectively. Twenty-nine patients in the pneumonia group and 56 patients in the COVID-19 group had a sodium level <134 mEq/L (29% vs 56%, RR 1.84, P < .01). The mean lowest serum sodium within 72 h of admission was 136.9 mEq/L in the pneumonia group and 134.5 mEq/L in the COVID-19 group (P < .01). Other notable findings included days of mechanical ventilation (3 days vs 8 days, respectively; P < .01), downgrade from the ICU (74.8% vs 59.6%, P = .02), ICU length of stay (4 days vs 10 days, P < .01), hospital length of stay (6 days vs 14 days, P < .01), and mortality (16.2% vs 39.4%, P < .01). Conclusion: Among critically ill patients with COVID-19, the risk of hyponatremia was significantly greater than the risk in critically ill patients with pneumonia.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hyponatremia , Pneumonia , Humans , COVID-19/complications , Hyponatremia/epidemiology , Hyponatremia/etiology , Incidence , Retrospective Studies , Critical Illness , Pneumonia/complications , Intensive Care Units , Hospitals, Teaching , Sodium
3.
J Pharm Pract ; 34(4): 662-664, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32508244

ABSTRACT

The use of systemic bivalirudin and an anticoagulant-free purge solution in a percutaneous left ventricular assist device (pVAD) is described in a patient with a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). An 80-year-old man with a past medical history of severe aortic stenosis and HIT was transferred to our facility for cardiogenic shock. The patient was emergently taken to the cardiac catheterization laboratory for balloon valvuloplasty and Impella pVAD (Abiomed, Inc) implantation. Due to the history of HIT, bivalirudin was chosen as an alternative anticoagulant. The device representative suggested adding bivalirudin 20 mg/500 mL to the Impella purge solution. However, due to the negligible amount of bivalirudin this would provide in comparison to patient's systemic intravenous bivalirudin dose, we elected not to add bivalirudin to the purge solution. The patient remained on the Impella for 72 hours with intravenous bivalirudin without any evidence of pump thrombosis as evidenced by unchanging flows and stable purge pressures. Unfortunately, despite functional Impella pVAD support, care was withdrawn due to ongoing multi-organ failure. This patient case demonstrated the safe, effective, and practical use of an anticoagulant-free purge solution with systemic bivalirudin in a patient with 72 hours of Impella support.


Subject(s)
Heart-Assist Devices , Thrombocytopenia , Aged, 80 and over , Anticoagulants , Heparin , Hirudins , Humans , Male , Peptide Fragments , Recombinant Proteins , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...