Impact of Blood Eosinophil Variability in Asthma: A Real-Life Population Study.

Rationale: Blood eosinophil count predicts response to inhaled corticosteroids and specific biologic therapies in selected patients with asthma. Despite this important role, fundamental aspects of eosinophil behavior in asthma have not been studied. Objectives: To investigate the behavior of blood eosinophils in a population, comparing their distribution with the general population and studying their intraindividual variability over time in relation to hospital episodes (emergency department visits and hospitalizations) in clinical practice. Methods: The distribution and variability of 35,703 eosinophil determinations in 10,059 stable patients with asthma were investigated in the MAJORICA (Majorca Real-Life Investigation in COPD and Asthma) cohort. Eosinophil distribution in the asthma population was compared with a control sample from the general population of 8,557 individuals. Eosinophil variability and hospital episodes were analyzed using correlations, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and multiple regression analysis. We defined the Eosinophil Variability Index as (Eosmax - Eosmin / Eosmax) × 100%. The findings of the asthma population were retested in an external well-characterized asthma cohort. Results: The eosinophil count values and variability were higher in the asthma population than in the general population (P < 0.001). Variability data showed a better association with hospital episodes than the counting values. An Eosinophil Variability Index ⩾50% was a better predictor for any hospital episode than any of the absolute counting values. These results were validated in the external cohort. Conclusions: The eosinophil variability in patients with asthma better identifies the risk of any hospital episode than the absolute counting values currently used to target specific treatments.

Prevalence of pulmonary embolism in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and high D-dimer values: A prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia is associated to systemic hyper-inflammation and abnormal coagulation profile. D-dimer elevation is particularly frequent, and values higher than 1µg/mL have been associated with disease severity and in-hospital mortality. Previous retrospective studies found a high pulmonary embolism (PE) prevalence, however, it should be highlighted that diagnoses were only completed when PE was clinically suspected. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Single-center prospective cohort study. Between April 6th and April 17th 2020, consecutive confirmed cases of COVID-19 pneumonia with D-dimer >1 µg/mL underwent computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) to investigate the presence and magnitude of PE. Demographic and laboratory data, comorbidities, CTPA scores, administered treatments, and, clinical outcomes were analysed and compared between patients with and without PE. RESULTS: Thirty consecutive patients (11 women) were included. PE was diagnosed in 15 patients (50%). In patients with PE, emboli were located mainly in segmental arteries (86%) and bilaterally (60%). Patients with PE were significantly older (median age 67.0 (IQR 63.0-73.0) vs. 57.0 (IQR 48.0-69.0) years, p = .048) and did not differ in sex or risk factors for thromboembolic disease from the non-PE group. D-dimer, platelet count, and, C reactive protein values were significantly higher among PE patients. D-dimer values correlated with the radiologic magnitude of PE (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and D-dimer values higher than 1 µg/mL presented a high prevalence of PE, regardless of clinical suspicion. We consider that these findings could contribute to improve the prognosis of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, by initiating anticoagulant therapy when a PE is found.