ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Calcitonin gene-related peptide has shown to play a central role in cluster headache (CH) pathophysiology. A clinical trial with galcanezumab was carried out in chronic cluster headache (CCH) but did not meet its primay endpoint. However, its off-label use in patients with CCH refractory to other therapies could be considered. We aimed to asses the efficacy and safety of galcanezumab as CCH preventive treatment in a real-life setting. METHODS: An observational study was conducted. Patients with CCH who received at least one dose of 240 mg of galcanezumab. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients who tried a mean of 6.3 ± 1.9 preventive therapies, including onabotulinumtoxinA in 90.5%. At baseline, the median of frequency was 60 (37.5-105) monthly attacks with 10 (8.3-10) points in pain intensity (Numerical Rating Scale). After one month, the frequency decreased to 31 (10.5-45) (p = 0.003) with 8.5 (8-9.5) intensity (p = 0.007); 10 (47.6%) patients were 50% responders of whom four (19%) were 75% responders. Of the 15 patients with 3 months of follow-up, seven (46.6%) reduced their frequency by 50% and four (26.6%) by 75%, with 40 (10-60) monthly attacks (p = 0.07) and pain intensity of 8 (5-10) (p = 0.026). Some 52% patients experienced adverse events, mostly mild. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of refractory CCH, galcanezumab was effective in almost 50% of patients. This finding supports individual off-label treatment attempts.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Cluster Headache , Migraine Disorders , Humans , Cluster Headache/drug therapy , Cluster Headache/chemically induced , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Double-Blind MethodABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The benefit of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in wake-up stroke (WUS), stroke of unknown time of onset (SUKO), or when time exceeds 4.5 h from last-seen-normal (LSN) guided by CT perfusion (CTP) or MRI has been recently suggested. However, there is limited information of IVT in those patients in real-world studies. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate safety and efficacy of IVT selected by CTP in patients with WUS, SUKO, or stroke of time onset beyond 4.5 h. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied a prospective cohort of patients who underwent IVT from January 2010 to December 2017. Two groups were defined: standard of care group (SC) included patients with time onset <4.5 h and CTP group included patients with WUS, SUKO, or onset beyond >4.5 h from LSN with penumbra area in CTP. We evaluated baseline characteristics, functional outcomes according to modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge and at 90 days, and intracranial hemorrhages rates. RESULTS: 657 patients were studied: 604 (92%) were treated in the SC group and 53 (8%) in the CTP group. The mean NIHSS score was 9.8 in the CTP group versus 13 in the SC group (p = 0.001). Seventeen patients in the CTP group (32.1%) received bridging therapy with mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Last time seen well-to-needle time was 538 versus 155 min (p < 0.001). The incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was equal in both groups (3.8 vs. 3.8%, p = 1). Good functional outcome (mRS < 2) was achieved in both groups (72 vs. 60.4%, p = 0.107). CONCLUSIONS: IVT in patients with WUS, SUKO, or stroke beyond >4.5 h from LSN, with salvageable brain tissue on CTP, seems to be safe and has similar functional outcomes at 90 days to the standard therapeutic window, even when combined with MT.
