A Novel Classification of the Inframammary Fold for Use in Primary Breast Augmentation.

BACKGROUND: Previous aesthetic breast surgery algorithms have not addressed the importance of evaluating the native inframammary fold before primary breast augmentation. In the authors' experience, assessment of native inframammary fold anatomy significantly impacts surgical planning and technique. Failure to adequately evaluate and manage the inframammary fold leads to many of the common problems of the lower pole, including double-bubble deformity. METHODS: The authors assessed the inframammary fold preoperatively in 2192 consecutive patients undergoing primary breast augmentation between June of 2014 and December of 2018. A novel classification of inframammary fold morphology was devised based on review of standardized preoperative photographs. Outcome assessment was performed postoperatively at 3-month intervals. RESULTS: The authors identified four clear inframammary fold subtypes based on their clinical appearance, ranging from the nonexistent type F0 to the well-formed and fixed type F3. The key outcome measure examined was the presence of double-bubble deformity postoperatively. There were three total cases of double-bubble deformity identified in our cohort (<1 percent of patients). All cases of double-bubble deformity occurred in patients with a type 3 fold. CONCLUSIONS: The inframammary fold defines the inferior boundary of the lower pole of the breast and is a critical landmark to the aesthetic breast surgeon. The authors describe a unique and simple inframammary fold classification system that assists in selection of the appropriate approach to the inframammary fold in addition to implant dimensional planning. The authors have found that this system-in particular, the identification of the type F3 inframammary fold-has minimized the risk of inframammary fold-associated complications in over 2000 cases. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Early Application of Microsurgical Flaps in the Electric Burns of Extremities: A Two Institutional Case Series.

Some groups have avoided early microsurgical flaps in electrical burns under the pretext of injury to the microvasculature, which could increase vascular thrombosis. However, this option frequently results in amputation of the extremity. This study aims to evaluate the early application of microsurgical flaps for the treatment of electrical burns of extremities. A case series was retrospectively evaluated including patients with electrical trauma in extremities undergoing early microsurgical reconstruction. Data were obtained from medical charts, including age, trauma location, flap type and microvascular anastomosis, the need for other procedures, postoperative complications, the length of hospital stay after the flap surgery, and patient outcomes. Five microsurgical flaps were performed in less than 30 days to trauma, one anterolateral thigh flap to cover skin failure in upper limb, and four radial forearm flaps to cover failure in feet. The patient ages had a mean of 25.8 years (from 12 to 42 years). The microsurgical procedure occurred from 21 to 27 days after the burn, with a mean of 24.2 days. Hospital discharge had a mean of 26.6 days (from 19 to 35 days after the surgery). Only one patient required reintervention for re-anastomosis. All patients had a good flap viability, avoiding amputation of the affected extremity and with a proper preservation of function. The early application of microsurgical flaps for patients with electrical burns of extremities may provide adequate, sturdy, and stable skin coverage, contributing to the treatment of noble structures exposed and avoiding amputation of the extremities.

Outcomes of Immediate Internal Pudendal Artery Perforator Flap Reconstruction for Irradiated Abdominoperineal Resection Defects.

BACKGROUND: There are many previous reports for using the internal pudendal artery perforator flap in vulvovaginal reconstruction; however, reports of this flap for perineal reconstruction after abdominoperineal excision of the rectum are scarce. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of immediate internal pudendal artery perforator flap reconstruction for irradiated abdominoperineal resection defects. DESIGN: This was a prospective case series. SETTINGS: This flap could represent a step forward over other perineal flap approaches or primary closure. PATIENTS: A total of 73 consecutive patients with anorectal tumors were included. INTERVENTIONS: The study included immediate perineal reconstruction using 122 internal pudendal artery perforator flaps after abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Dimensions of the perineal defect (in centimeters squared), hospital stay (days), healing time (days), and postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grades) were measured. RESULTS: The means of the perineal defect, hospital stay, and healing time were 51.62 cm, 15.94 days, and 38.52 days. The higher the patient BMI, the longer healing time (p = 0.02); Clavien-Dindo complications grades III to IV were greater in patients with perineal defect ≥60 cm (p = 0.03; OR = 10.56); postoperative complications were higher both in patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma (p = 0.005; OR = 6.09) and in patients with comorbidities (p = 0.04; OR = 2.78); hospital stay (p= 0.001) and healing time (p < 0.001) were higher in patients who had postoperative complications. The complete perineal wound healing at 12 weeks was achieved by 95% of patients, and our 30-day mortality rate was 4%. LIMITATIONS: As a nonrandomized study, our results have to be interpreted with caution. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple previously described advantages associated with internal pudendal artery perforator flap were also observed here, reinforcing the idea that it is reliable, versatile, and a useful option for perineal reconstruction after abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. Therefore, we propose that this flap could be considered as the first choice for perineal reconstruction in selected patients with moderate and some large defects after abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A367.