Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
AANA J ; 77(3): 213-8, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19645171

ABSTRACT

Two common forms of postoperative analgesia used in patients following an anterior cruciate ligament repair (ACLR) are the femoral nerve block (FNB) and the combined femoral-sciatic nerve block (FSB). The purpose of this study was to determine if the addition of the sciatic nerve block to the FNB is truly beneficial in ACLR patients requesting regional anesthesia for postoperative pain control. All subjects scheduled for an ACLR, requesting general anesthesia and preoperative placement of a peripheral nerve block (PNB), were randomized to receive an FNB or an FSB. Analgesic requirements, pain scores, and overall postoperative analgesic satisfaction were the primary outcomes measured. The data for 56 subjects (FNB, 27; FSB, 29) were used in analysis. Significantly higher analgesic requirements, pain scores, and lower satisfaction scores were noted in the FNB group compared with the FSB group (P < .05). No other differences were noted between groups in demographic data. Based on this investigation, we concluded that the FSB, compared with FNB alone, provides superior postoperative analgesia in patients receiving an ACLR and should be included in the anesthetic care plan in which a PNB is planned to facilitate postoperative analgesia.


Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery , Femoral Nerve , Nerve Block/methods , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Sciatic Nerve , Adult , Clinical Nursing Research , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Nerve Block/nursing , Nurse Anesthetists , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative/diagnosis , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Patient Satisfaction , Prospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Statistics, Nonparametric , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ; 18(1): 107-12, 2008 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18266586

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Telestration is an important teaching tool in minimally invasive surgery (MIS). While robotic surgery offers the added benefit of three-dimensional (3-D) visualization, telestration technology does not currently exist for this modality. This project aimed to develop a video algorithm to accurately translate a mentor's two-dimensional (2-D) telestration into a 3-D telestration in the da Vinci visual field. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prototype 3-D telestration system was constructed to translate 2-D telestration from a mentor station into 3-D graphics for the trainee at the robotic console. This system uses fast image correlation algorithms to allow 2-D images to be placed over the same anatomic location in the two separate video channels of the stereoscopic robotic visualization system. Three subjects of varying surgical backgrounds, blinded to the mode of telestration (2-D vs. 3-D), were tested in the laboratory, using a simulated robotic task. RESULTS: There were few technologic errors (2), only one of which resulted in a task error, in 99 total trials. Only the experienced MIS staff surgeon had a significantly faster task time in 2-D than in 3-D (P < 0.05). The MIS fellow recorded the fastest task times in 2-D and 3-D (P < 0.05). There were nine task errors, six of which were committed by the MIS fellow. The nonsurgeon trainee had the least number of errors but also had the slowest times. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic telestration in 3-D is feasible and does not negatively impact performance in laboratory tasks. We plan to refine the prototype and investigate its use in vivo.


Subject(s)
Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/education , Robotics/education , Teaching Materials , Algorithms , Feasibility Studies
3.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ; 16(5): 445-51, 2006 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17004866

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: One of the most significant limitations of surgical robots has been their inability to allow multiple surgeons and surgeons-in-training to engage in collaborative control of robotic surgical instruments. We report the initial experience with a novel two-headed da Vinci surgical robot that has two collaborative modes: the "swap" mode allows two surgeons to simultaneously operate and actively swap control of the robot's four arms, and the "nudge" mode allows them to share control of two of the robot's arms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The utility of the mentoring console operating in its two collaborative modes was evaluated through a combination of dry laboratory exercises and animal laboratory surgery. The results from surgeon-resident collaborative performance of complex three-handed surgical tasks were compared to results from single-surgeon and single-resident performance. Statistical significance was determined using Student's t-test. RESULTS: Collaborative surgeon-resident swap control reduced the time to completion of complex three-handed surgical tasks by 25% compared to single-surgeon operation of a four-armed da Vinci (P < 0.01) and by 34% compared to single-resident operation (P < 0.001). While swap mode was found to be most helpful during parts of surgical procedures that require multiple hands (such as isolation and division of vessels), nudge mode was particularly useful for guiding a resident's hands during crucially precise steps of an operation (such as proper placement of stitches). CONCLUSION: The da Vinci mentoring console greatly facilitates surgeon collaboration during robotic surgery and improves the performance of complex surgical tasks. The mentoring console has the potential to improve resident participation in surgical robotics cases, enhance resident education in surgical training programs engaged in surgical robotics, and improve patient safety during robotic surgery.


Subject(s)
General Surgery/education , Internship and Residency , Robotics/instrumentation , Surgical Procedures, Operative/education , Animals , Cooperative Behavior , Equipment Design
4.
Inorg Chem ; 35(23): 6688-6693, 1996 Nov 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11666830

ABSTRACT

The syntheses of the water-soluble, chelating phosphines 1,2-bis(bis(hydroxybutyl)phosphino)ethane (1, n = 3; DHBuPE) and 1,2-bis(bis(hydroxypentyl)phosphino)ethane (1, n = 4; DHPePE) are reported. These ligands (and, in general, other 1,2-bis(bis(hydroxyalkyl)phosphino)ethane ligands) can be used to impart water solubility to metal complexes. As examples of this, the [Ni(DHPrPE)(2)Cl]Cl (2), [Rh(DHPrPE)(2)][Cl] (3), and [Ru(DHBuPE)(2)Cl(2)][Cl] (4) complexes were synthesized; they are indeed soluble in water (>0.5 M). Crystals of DHPrPE (1, n = 2) are monoclinic, space group P2(1)/c, with a = 9.5935(8) Å, b = 9.353(2) Å, c = 10.655(2) Å, alpha = 90 degrees, beta = 100.03(1) degrees, gamma = 90, V = 941.5(5) Å(3), R = 0.051, and Z = 2. Crystals of [Ni(DHPrPE)(2)Cl]Cl (2) are monoclinic, space group I2, with a = 15.951(3) Å, b = 11.454(2) Å, c = 20.843(3) Å, alpha = 90 degrees, beta = 91.24(2) degrees, gamma = 90 degrees, V = 3807(2) Å(3), R = 0.062, and Z = 4. Crystals of [Rh(DHPrPE)(2)][Cl] (3) are triclinic, space group P&onemacr;, with a = 13.900(2) Å, b = 15.378(2) Å, c = 18.058(2) Å, alpha = 87.71(1) degrees, beta = 75.03(1) degrees, gamma = 85.24(1), V = 3715(2) Å(3), R = 0.044, and Z = 4. Crystals of [Ru(DHBuPE)(2)Cl(2)][Cl] (4) are monoclinic, space group C2/c, with a = 14.310(2) Å, b = 21.630(2) Å, c = 15.459(3) Å, alpha = 90 degrees, beta = 99.83(1) degrees, gamma = 90, V = 4715(1) Å(3), R = 0.056, and Z = 4.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...