Promoting Sustainability in Housing with Services: Insights From the Right Care, Right Place, Right Time Program.

Despite the widely-acknowledged potential of housing with services for improving the lives of low-income older adults, ensuring their financial sustainability has been challenging. This study aimed to address this issue, drawing on 31 key informant interviews and three focus groups with payers, housing providers, and community partners involved in the Boston-area Right Care, Right Place, Right Time Program, which enrolled about 400 older adults. Transcripts were qualitatively analyzed using thematic coding. Participants agreed on the program's value, but there was little consensus on mechanisms for securing ongoing funding. The broadly distributed responsibility for individuals in housing sites, which involves health insurers, hospitals, and community service providers, provides little incentive for investment by these entities. Findings suggest that governmental mechanisms, probably at the federal level, are needed to channel funding toward these supportive services. Without such reliable funding sources, replication of supportive housing models for low-income older people will prove difficult.

Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services in the Wake of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The need to bolster Medicaid home and community-based services (HCBS) became more evident during the COVID-19 pandemic. This recognition stemmed from the challenges of keeping people safe in nursing homes and the acute workforce shortages in the HCBS sector. This article examines two major federal developments and state responses in HCBS options as a result of the pandemic. The first initiative entails a one-year increase of the federal Medicaid matching rate for HCBS included in the American Rescue Plan Act championed by the Biden administration. The second initiative encompasses administrative flexibilities that permitted states to temporarily expand and modify their existing Medicaid HCBS programs. The article concludes that the effects of the pandemic flexibilities and enhanced federal funding on most state HCBS programs will be limited without continued investment and leadership on the part of the federal government, which is a Biden administration priority. States that make the American Rescue Act and COVID-19 flexibilities initiatives permanent are states that have the fiscal resources and political commitment to expanding HCBS benefits that other states lack. States' different approaches to bolstering Medicaid HCBS during the pandemic may contribute to widening disparities in access and quality of HCBS across states and populations who depend on Medicaid HCBS.

Type of Home Care-Informal Versus At Least Some Formal-Matters for Recipients' Perceived Control.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Perceived control is an important psychological resource for middle-aged and older adults. Aging in place may help foster feelings of control, yet many community-dwelling older adults must rely on others-whether family, friends, or professionals-for physical assistance. This study investigated how receiving home care from different sources was associated with two facets of perceived control (mastery and perceived constraints) among adults with varying levels of physical disability. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Data were drawn from the 2012 and 2014 waves of the Health and Retirement Study. Community-dwelling adults aged 50 years and older receiving help for at least one activity of daily living (ADL) impairment (N = 884) reported their relationship to each respective caregiver (formal professional and/or informal family or friend), level of ADL impairment, and ratings of perceived control. Ordinary least squares regression was used to examine the association between type of support and perceived control, as well as the moderating effect of physical disability on that relationship. RESULTS: Compared to receipt of informal support alone, receiving a combination of formal and informal support was related to perceptions of greater control over one's life, but only in terms of mastery. The level of one's ADL impairment did not have a moderating effect on the relationship between support type and perceived control. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Findings suggested that the type of instrumental support adults receive in their home has implications for specific facets of perceived control. These findings can help inform home care program development.

The Mediating Role of Proxy Respondents on the Relationship Between Cognitive Function and Self-Rated Health.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Proxy respondents are an important tool in survey research, especially among people with cognitive impairment. However, proxy respondents may be unable to accurately answer subjective survey instruments for cognitively impaired persons. This study investigates the mediating effect of proxy status on the relationship between cognitive impairment and subjectively rated health. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Respondents from the 2018 wave of the Health and Retirement Study (N = 17,146) were included, and the Baron and Kenny method assessed the potential mediating role of having a proxy on subjectively rated health. Subjectively rated health and proxy status were dichotomously coded, and relationships between cognitive impairment, proxy status, and subjectively rated health were assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Findings indicate that cognitive impairment is inversely associated with subjectively rated health, and it is directly associated with having a proxy. They also indicate that having a proxy is inversely related to subjectively rated health. When including proxy status and cognitive impairment in the same model, cognitive impairment no longer predicted subjectively rated health. This indicates that proxy status perfectly mediated the relationship between cognitive impairment and subjectively rated health. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Measuring the experiences of people with cognitive impairment is challenging in survey research due to the limiting features of cognitive impairment. Although having a proxy respondent helps address attrition-related measurement challenges in survey research, findings indicate that proxies report worse subjectively rated health for people with cognitive impairment compared to individuals with comparable levels of cognitive impairment without a proxy. Future research may benefit from exploring optimal proxy-respondent characteristics.

Enhancing Federal Revenue under the American Rescue Plan Act: An Opportunity to Bolster State Medicaid Home and Community-Based Services Programs.

The American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) includes a one-year 10 percentage point increase in the Federal Medical Assistance Percentage for Medicaid-funded home and community-based services (HCBS). The goal is to strengthen state efforts to help older adults and people with disabilities live safely in their homes and communities rather than in institutional settings during the COVID-19 pandemic. This essay provides a detailed description and analysis of this provision, including issues state governments need to consider when expending the additional federal revenue provided. It also draws lessons from the Affordable Care Act's Balancing Incentive Program to suggest insights for the potential of ARPA to promote further growth in Medicaid HCBS programs. It argues that key to success will be consultation with community stakeholders under the auspices of clear and frequent federal guidance and the development of concrete plans with which to expend the additional revenues in the most effective way possible in the limited time frame provided. The essay concludes by highlighting the importance of instituting strategies and processes for maximizing enhanced federal matching funds under ARPA in preparation for subsequent availability of substantial additional federal resources targeting Medicaid HCBS under other proposed initiatives.

Focusing on the Positive: Home Health Aides' Desire for Autonomy and Control.

Home Health Aides (HHAs) are one of the fastest growing workforces in the country, yet the industry struggles to recruit and retain workers. This study explored HHAs' experiences with the level of control, autonomy, and decision-making authority in their work. Six focus groups with 37 HHAs were conducted in Massachusetts. Findings showed that HHAs viewed control as a positive job characteristic, which attracted them to and led them to remain in the position. Positive benefits included having control over client selection, location, hours, and the ability to determine their day-to-day tasks and schedules. The study results highlight the value that HHAs place on autonomy and control and the potential benefit that these job qualities have for greater recruitment and retention of these workers. Amplifying control by bolstering training and expanding scope of practice may entice new individuals to pursue a HHA career and help maintain those currently in the position.

The effect of the right care, right place, right time (R3) initiative on Medicare health service use among older affordable housing residents.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of an affordable housing-based supportive services intervention, which partnered with health and community service providers, on Medicare health service use among residents. DATA SOURCES: Analyses used aggregated fee-for-service Medicare claims data from 2017 to 2020 for beneficiaries living in 34 buildings in eastern Massachusetts. STUDY DESIGN: Using a quasi-experimental design, a "difference-in-differences" framework was employed to isolate changes in outcomes, focusing on changes in pre- and post-intervention health service use across two stages of the intervention. Phase 1 encompassed the initial implementation period, and Phase 2 introduced a strategy to target residents at high risk of poor health outcomes. Key health service outcomes included hospitalizations, 30-day hospital readmission, and emergency department use. DATA COLLECTION: Medicare claims data for 10,412 individuals were obtained from a Quality Improvement Organization and aggregated at the building level. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Analyses for Phase 1 found that hospital admission rates, emergency department admissions and payments, and hospital readmission rates grew more slowly for intervention sites than comparison sites. These findings were strengthened after the introduction of risk-targeting in Phase 2. Compared to selected control buildings, residents in intervention buildings experienced significantly lower rates of increases in inpatient hospitalization rates (-16% vs. +6%), hospital admission days (-25% vs. +29%), average hospital days (-12% vs. +14%), hospital admission payments (-22% vs. +33%), and 30-day hospital readmission rates (-22% vs. +54%). When accounting for the older age of the intervention residents, the size of the decline recorded in emergency department admissions was 6.7% greater for the intervention sites than the decline in comparison sites. CONCLUSIONS: A wellness-focused supportive services intervention was effective in reducing select health service use. The introduction of risk-targeting further strengthened this effect. Age-friendly health systems would benefit from enhanced partnerships with affordable housing sites to improve care and reduce service use for older residents.

A Comparative Analysis of State Implementation of the Community First Choice Program.

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act included Community First Choice (CFC), a new optional Medicaid home and community-based services (HCBS) state plan benefit which states could adopt. Through the CFC program, states can provide expanded home and community-based attendant services and supports to older adults and persons with disabilities. A benefit of CFC is that states receive a higher federal match rate than other HCBS programs. Thus far, eights states have adopted CFC. This comparative case study analysis examines state-level implementation of CFC to identify what facilitated implementation and what created challenges. The results suggest that consulting with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services facilitated implementation while existing programs, insufficient engagement with stakeholders, aggressive timelines, and limited staff resources presented challenges. Based on these findings, states may want to consider how they approach implementing expansions or enhancements to HCBS benefits under the American Rescue Plan Act.

The Effects of Religiosity on Depression Trajectories After Widowhood.

This longitudinal study analyzed data from the 2006-2016 waves of the nationally representative Health and Retirement Study (HRS). Trajectories of depression among older adults ≥ 50 years (N = 1254) were examined over time to explore patterns of depression among those entering widowhood and the potential impact of religiosity on depressive symptoms during various stages of widowhood. Ordinary least squares (OLS) regression analysis was used to examine the association between widowhood and depression and the role of religiosity as a moderator of this association. Older adults experienced a statistically significant increase in depressive symptomology after the onset of widowhood, and depressive symptomology decreased post widowhood, but did not return to pre-widowhood levels. Additionally, high religious service attendance and higher intrinsic religiosity were both associated with lower depressive symptomology. High religious service attendance moderated the relationship between widowhood and depression among widowed older adults living alone.

Federal Incentives to Reform Long-Term Care Under the Affordable Care Act: State Adoption of the Balancing Incentive Program, 2011-2014.

OBJECTIVES: The Balancing Incentive Program (BIP) was an optional program for states within the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to promote Medicaid-funded home and community-based services (HCBS) for older adults and persons with disabilities. Twenty-one states opted to participate in BIP, including several states steadfastly opposed to the health insurance provisions of the Affordable Care Act. This study focused on identifying what factors were associated with states' participation in this program. METHODS: Event history analysis was used to model state adoption of BIP from 2011 to 2014. A range of potential factors was considered representing states' economic, political, and programmatic conditions. RESULTS: The results indicate that states with a higher percentage of Democrats in the state legislature, fewer state employees per capita, and more nursing facility beds were more likely to adopt BIP. In addition, states with fewer home health agencies per capita, that devoted smaller proportions of Medicaid long-term care spending to HCBS, and that had more Money Follows the Person transitions were also more likely to pursue BIP. DISCUSSION: The findings highlight the role of partisanship, administrative capacity, and program history in state BIP adoption decisions. The inclusion of BIP in the Affordable Care Act may have deterred some states from participating in the program due to partisan opposition to the legislation. To encourage the adoption of optional HCBS programs, federal policymakers should consider the role of financial incentives, especially for states with limited bureaucratic capacity and that have made less progress rebalancing Medicaid long-term services and supports.

Diagnoses of Chronic Health Conditions and Change in Subjective Age: The Moderating Role of Chronological Age.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Health is a predictor of subjective age, and although inconclusive, the strength of this association is not uniform across different age groups. This study investigates if new diagnoses of chronic health conditions are associated with a change in subjective age and if chronological age moderates this relationship. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Using data from the Health and Retirement Study, residualized change regression analysis was performed for a sample of 5,158 respondents older than 50 years to examine their subjective age in 2014 relative to that reported in 2010. The main predictor was the number of chronic health conditions newly diagnosed between 2010 and 2014. Chronological age in 2010 was the moderator. RESULTS: Results showed that each new diagnosis of a chronic health condition was significantly associated with a 0.68-year increase in subjective age reported in 2014, compared to subjective age reported in 2010. However, this increase in subjective age was attenuated by 0.05 years for each additional year in 2010 chronological age. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: According to Social and Temporal Comparison theories, people compare themselves to their age peers and earlier selves. Given expectations for better health at younger chronological ages, being diagnosed with chronic health conditions may have a stronger association with subjective age among middle-aged persons when compared with older persons. The findings suggest that subjective age may be used as a screening tool to predict how chronic disease diagnosis may influence peoples' sense of self, which in turn shapes future health.

A Comparative Case Study Analysis of Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing the Affordable Care Act's Balancing Incentive Program.

The Affordable Care Act included the opportunity for states to increase spending on Medicaid home and community-based services (HCBS) for older adults and persons with disabilities through the Balancing Incentive Program (BIP). This study utilized comparative case studies to identify the factors that facilitated or impeded states' implementation of BIP. Findings indicate factors that facilitated the implementation of BIP were communication with the federal government and its contractor, merging BIP with existing HCBS programs, and enhanced federal revenue. On the other hand, the short duration of BIP, state procurement and contracting processes, and the need to incorporate feedback from non-governmental stakeholders and determining how to spend the enhanced revenue proved challenging for some states. This research suggests ways federal and state officials can implement new initiatives to achieve greater rebalancing of Medicaid long-term services and supports for older adults.

Shining a Spotlight: The Ramifications of the COVID-19 Pandemic for Older Adults.

The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted life globally through virus-related mortality and morbidity and the social and economic impacts of actions taken to stop the virus' spread. It became evident early in the pandemic that COVID-19 and the strategies adopted to mitigate its effects would have a disproportionate impact on older adults. This special issue of the Journal of Aging & Social Policy reports original empirical research and perspectives on the ramifications of the COVID-19 pandemic for this population. This introductory essay highlights key issues pertaining to the impact of COVID-19 on older adults and their families, caregivers, and communities. The prevalence and susceptibility of COVID-19 infection in the older adult population is discussed, including the devastating consequences of the pandemic for residents and staff of long-term care facilities. This is followed by a brief examination of ageism and social isolation brought to the fore during the pandemic, as well as the adverse effects of the pandemic for the economy and racial and ethnic minority populations. It concludes with an overview of issue content.

A comparative analysis of state adoption of the Community First Choice program.

Over the last several decades, policymakers have focused on rebalancing Medicaid-funded long-term services and supports toward home and community-based services (HCBS). The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) included several opportunities for states to further promote HCBS options. One optional opportunity for states to expand Medicaid HCBS was the 1915(k) Community First Choice (CFC) program. To date, eight states have elected to add CFC as a Medicaid benefit. This study utilized comparative case studies to identify the factors that influenced states' adoption of CFC. Results highlight the important role that state bureaucrats, economic concerns, and existing HCBS programs had on states' decisions to adopt CFC.

The impact of health-related supports in senior housing on ambulance transfers and visits to emergency departments: The Right Care, Right Place, Right Time Project.

OBJECTIVE: To test the impact of placing a wellness team (nurse and social worker) in senior housing on ambulance transfers and visits to emergency departments over 18 months. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Intervention sites included seven Boston-area buildings, with five buildings at comparable settings acting as controls. Data derive from building-level ambulance data from emergency responders; building-level Medicare claims data on emergency department utilization; and individual-level baseline assessment data from participants in the intervention (n = 353) and control (n = 208) sites. STUDY DESIGN: We used a pre/postdifference in difference quasi-experimental design applying several analytic methods. The preintervention period was January 2016-March 2017, while the intervention period was July 2017-December 2018. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Emergency responders provided aggregate transfer data on a daily basis for intervention and control buildings; the Quality Improvement Organization provided quarterly aggregate data on emergency department visit rates; and assessment data came from a modified Vitalize 360 assessment and coaching tool. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The study found an 18.2% statistically significant decline in ambulance transfers in intervention buildings, with greater declines in buildings that had fewer services available at baseline, compared to other intervention sites. Analysis of Medicare claims data, adjusted for the proportion of residents over 75 per building, found fewer visits to emergency departments in intervention buildings. CONCLUSIONS: Health-related supports in senior housing sites can be effective in reducing emergency transfers and visits to emergency departments.

Maximizing Home Health Aide Retention: The Impact of Control and Support on the Job.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study examined relationships between the level of control and support and home health aides (HHAs) job satisfaction and intent to leave the job. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Data derive from a survey of 512 HHAs in Massachusetts. Logistic regression using generalized estimating equations was employed for the analysis. Dependent variables included satisfaction and intent to leave the job as a home care aide generally and satisfaction and intent to leave the job at the aide's current agency. RESULTS: The findings showed that greater control and support on the job were important predictors of positive work outcomes, controlling for job demands and other covariates. The odds of HHAs being satisfied with their job as a home care aide increased with the degree of control, whereas the odds of HHAs being satisfied with their job at their current agency increased with the extent of support. Control was negatively associated with HHAs' intent to leave the job as an aide; no relationship was found between control or support and HHAs' intent to leave their current agency. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The results from this study illustrate the importance for HHAs of having control and autonomy in their work, as well as the benefit of support from supervisors and the home care agency, on satisfaction and intent to leave. Expanding HHA's ability to maintain control over their day-to-day work, as well as enhancing the supports available to them, is likely to benefit home care workers, clients, and agencies through increased retention.

Pursuing Medicaid Block Grants with the Healthy Adult Opportunity Initiative: Dressing Up Old Ideas in New Clothes.

The Trump administration's Healthy Adult Opportunity waiver follows a long history of Republican attempts to retrench the Medicaid program through block grants and to markedly reduce federal spending while providing states with substantially greater flexibility over program structure. Previous block grant proposals were promulgated during the presidential administrations of Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush and majorities in Congress led by House Speaker Newt Gingrich and House Budget Committee Chair and then Speaker Paul Ryan. Most recently, Medicaid block grants featured prominently in Republican efforts to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act. This essay traces the history of Republican Medicaid block grant proposals, culminating in the Trump administration's Healthy Adult Opportunity initiative. It concludes that the Trump administration's attempt to convert Medicaid into a block grant program through the waiver process is illegal and, if implemented, would leave thousands of people without necessary medical care. This fact, combined with failed legislative efforts to block grant Medicaid during the last forty years, highlights the substantial roadblocks to radically restructuring a popular program that helps millions of Americans.

Thrust Into the Spotlight: COVID-19 Focuses Media Attention on Nursing Homes.

OBJECTIVE: This study sheds light on the agenda-setting role of the media during the COVID-19 crisis by examining trends in nursing home (NH) coverage in 4 leading national newspapers-The New York Times, Washington Post, USA Today, and Los Angeles Times. METHOD: Keyword searches of the Nexis Uni database identified 2,039 NH-related articles published from September 2018 to June 2020. Trends in the frequency of NH coverage and its tone (negative) and prominence (average words, daily article count, opinion piece) were examined. RESULTS: Findings indicate a dramatic rise in the number of NH articles published in the months following the first COVID-19 case, far exceeding previous levels. NH coverage became considerably more prominent, as the average number of words and daily articles on NHs increased. The proportion of negative articles largely remained consistent, though volume rose dramatically. Weekly analysis revealed acceleration in observed trends within the post-COVID-19 period itself. These trends, visible in all papers, were especially dramatic in The New York Times. DISCUSSION: Overall, findings reveal marked growth in the frequency and number of prominent and negative NH articles during the COVID-19 crisis. The increased volume of coverage has implications for the relative saliency of NHs to other issues during the pandemic. The increased prominence of coverage has implications for the perceived importance of addressing pre-existing deficits and the devastating consequences of the pandemic for NHs.

Stepping into the Breach of Federal Inaction: Reforming the Financing of Long-Term Services and Supports in the Post-CLASS Era.

The growing need for long-term services and supports (LTSS) poses significant challenges to both individuals and government. This article documents the continuing failure to tackle this problem at the national level-a failure that was most recently seen in the fallout from the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which included the single piece of national legislation ever enacted to comprehensively address LTSS costs: the Community Living Assistance Services and Supports (CLASS) Act. The CLASS Act was passed as part of the ACA (Title 8) but was repealed in 2013. Following its demise, policy experts and some Democrats have made additional proposals for addressing the LTSS financing crisis. Moreover, significant government action is taking place at the state level, both to relieve financial and emotional burdens on LTSS recipients and their families and to ease pressure on state Medicaid budgets. Lessons from these initiatives could serve as opportunities for learning how to overcome roadblocks to successful policy development, adoption, and implementation across states and for traversing the policy and political tradeoffs should a policy window once again open for addressing the problem of LTSS financing nationally.

Protecting and Improving the Lives of Older Adults in the COVID-19 Era.

The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the lives of people throughout the world, either directly, due to exposure to the virus, or indirectly, due to measures taken to mitigate the virus' effects. Older adults have been particularly hard hit, dying in disproportionately higher numbers, especially in long-term care facilities. Local, regional, and national government actions taken to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 have thus served, in part, to shield older adults from the virus, though not without adverse side effects, including increased social isolation, enhanced economic risk, revealed ageism, delayed medical treatment, and challenges getting basic needs met. This special issue of the Journal of Aging & Social Policy explores the myriad ways in which the COVID-19 pandemic has affected older adults and their families, caregivers, and communities. It proposes policies and strategies for protecting and improving the lives of older people during the pandemic. It draws lessons for aging policy and practice more generally, given underlying challenges brought to the fore by government, provider, community, and individual responses to the pandemic.