A Profile of Orthopedic Education in Emergency Medicine Residency Programs in the United States.

Introduction Emergency medicine (EM) residents throughout the United States are required to become skilled at performing a robust list of select orthopedic procedures, as well as learn how to diagnose and manage patients with musculoskeletal complaints. However, EM residency programs vary significantly in how they teach orthopedics and the content they cover. The purpose of this study was to profile the orthopedic education received by emergency medicine residents in United States residency programs. Methods We developed a survey based on accreditation requirements and The Model of the Clinical Practice of Emergency Medicine. The survey was designed to gather detailed information about the orthopedic education provided to EM residents. The survey was sent to EM program directors or their designees at all 263 accredited EM residency programs across the United States between October 2020 to January 2021. Results We attained a 34.6% (91 of 260) adjusted response rate with adequate representation of relevant program characteristics such as region, accreditation status, program length, size, and setting. Most (63.7%) responding programs required an orthopedics rotation during the intern year. These required orthopedic rotations were primarily four weeks in duration. The most common methods for teaching orthopedic topics included didactics (97.8%), procedures on live patients under supervision (73.3%), and assigned reading materials in textbooks or manuals (68.9%). Conclusion The orthopedic education received by EM residents in the United States is strikingly variable, with residency programs having to develop custom curricula to teach orthopedics content based on the resources available to them. Future efforts should be directed toward creating a universal curriculum that addresses accreditation and EM practice standards.

A First-Class Simulation: In-Situ In-Flight Medical Emergencies Curriculum for Emergency Medicine Residents Aboard a Commercial Airliner.

INTRODUCTION: In-flight medical emergencies occur in an estimated one out of 604 flights. Responding in this environment poses a unique set of challenges unfamiliar to most emergency medicine (EM) providers, including physical space and resource limitations. We developed a novel high-fidelity in-situ training curriculum focused on frequent or high-risk in-flight medical scenarios while replicating this austere environment. METHODS: Our residency program coordinated with our local airport's chief of security and an airline-specific station manager to arrange the use of a grounded Boeing 737 commercial airliner during late evening/early morning hours. Eight stations reviewing in-flight medical emergency topics were reviewed, five of which were simulation scenarios. We created medical and first-aid kits that reflect equipment used by commercial airlines. Residents' self-assessed competency and medical knowledge were assessed both initially and post-curriculum using a standardized questionnaire. RESULTS: Forty residents attended the educational event as learners. Self-assessed competency and medical knowledge increased after curriculum participation. All tested aspects of self-assessed competency had a statistically significant increase from a mean of 15.04 to 29.20 out of a maximum score of forty. The mean medical knowledge score increased from 4.65 to 6.93 out of 10 maximum points. CONCLUSION: A five-hour in-situ curriculum for reviewing in-flight medical emergencies increased self-assessed competency and medical knowledge for EM and EM-internal medicine residents. The curriculum was overwhelmingly well-received by learners.

Emergency medicine resident clinical experience vs. in-training examination content: A national database study.

Objectives: Emergency medicine (EM) residents take the In-Training Examination (ITE) annually to assess medical knowledge. Question content is derived from the Model of Clinical Practice of Emergency Medicine (EM Model), but it is unknown how well clinical encounters reflect the EM Model. The objective of this study was to compare the content of resident patient encounters from 2016-2018 to the content of the EM Model represented by the ITE Blueprint. Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study utilizing the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS). Reason for visit (RFV) codes were matched to the 20 categories of the American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) ITE Blueprint. All analyses were done with weighted methodology. The proportion of visits in each of the 20 content categories and 5 acuity levels were compared to the proportion in the ITE Blueprint using 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Both resident and nonresident patient visits demonstrated content differences from the ITE Blueprint. The most common EM Model category were visits with only RFV codes related to signs, symptoms, and presentations regardless of resident involvement. Musculoskeletal disorders (nontraumatic), psychobehavioral disorders, and traumatic disorders categories were overrepresented in resident encounters. Cardiovascular disorders and systemic infectious diseases were underrepresented. When residents were involved with patient care, visits had a higher proportion of RFV codes in the emergent and urgent acuity categories compared to those without a resident. Conclusions: Resident physicians see higher acuity patients with varied patient presentations, but the distribution of encounters differ in content category than those represented by the ITE Blueprint.

Beyond observation: Protocols and capabilities of an Emergency Department Observation Unit.

OBJECTIVE: Emergency Department Observation Units (Obs Units) provide a setting and a mechanism for further care of Emergency Department (ED) patients. Our hospital has a protocol-driven, type 1, complex 20 bed Obs Unit with 36 different protocols. We wanted to understand how the different protocols performed and what types of care were provided. METHODS: This was an IRB-approved, retrospective chart review study. A random 10% of ED patient charts with a "transfer to observation" order were selected monthly from October 2015 through June 2017. This database was designed to identify high and low functioning protocols based on length of stays (LOS) and admission rates. RESULTS: Over 20 months, a total of 984 patients qualified for the study. The average age was 49.5 ±â€¯17.2 years, 57.3% were women, and 32.3% were non-Caucasian. The admission rate was 23.5% with an average LOS in observation of 13.7 h [95% CI 13.3-14.1]. Thirty day return rate was 16.8% with 5.3% of the patients returning to the ED within the first 72 h. Thirty six different protocols were used, with the most common being chest pain (13.9%) and general (13.2%). Almost 70% received a consultation from another service, and 7.2% required a procedure while in observation. Procedures included fluoroscopic-guided lumbar punctures, endoscopies, dental extractions, and catheter replacements (nephrostomy, gastrostomy, and biliary tubes). CONCLUSIONS: An Obs Unit can care for a wide variety of patients who require multiple consultations, procedures, and care coordination while maintaining an acceptable length of stay and admission rate.

Pediatric Sports- and Recreation-Related Eye Injuries Treated in US Emergency Departments.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the epidemiologic characteristics of sports- and recreation-related eye injuries among children in the United States. METHODS: Data from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System were analyzed in a retrospective study of children ≤17 years of age treated in US emergency departments for sports- and recreation-related eye injuries from 1990 to 2012. RESULTS: From 1990 through 2012, an estimated 441 800 (95% confidence interval: 378 868-504 733) children were treated in US emergency departments for sports- and recreation-related eye injuries, averaging 26.9 injuries per 100 000 children. Children 10 to 14 and 15 to 17 years old had the highest rate of eye injury. Three-fourths of injuries were sustained by boys. The most common types of injury were corneal abrasion (27.1%), conjunctivitis (10.0%), and foreign body in the eye (8.5%). Most eye injuries were treated and released (94.6%); however, 4.7% were hospitalized. The most common sports and recreation activities and equipment associated with eye injury were basketball (15.9%), baseball and softball (15.2%), and nonpowder guns (10.6%). The overall rate of eye injury decreased slightly during the study period; however, the rate of eye injury associated with nonpowder guns increased by 168.8%, and nonpowder gun-related eye injuries accounted for 48.5% of hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric sports- and recreation-related eye injuries remain common. Increased prevention efforts are needed, especially for eye injuries associated with nonpowder guns. Increased child, parent, and coach education, as well as adoption of rules that mandate the use of eye protective equipment should be undertaken.