Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Mol Biol ; 427(7): 1564-74, 2015 Apr 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25681695

ABSTRACT

An evolutionary conserved response of cells to proteotoxic stress is the organized sequestration of misfolded proteins into subcellular deposition sites. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, three major sequestration sites for misfolded proteins exist, IPOD (insoluble protein deposit), INQ (intranuclear quality control compartment) [former JUNQ (juxtanuclear quality control compartment)] and CytoQ. IPOD is perivacuolar and predominantly sequesters amyloidogenic proteins. INQ and CytoQs are stress-induced deposits for misfolded proteins residing in the nucleus and the cytosol, respectively, and requiring cell-compartment-specific aggregases, nuclear Btn2 and cytosolic Hsp42 for formation. The organized aggregation of misfolded proteins is proposed to serve several purposes collectively increasing cellular fitness and survival under proteotoxic stress. These include (i) shielding of cellular processes from interference by toxic protein conformers, (ii) reducing the substrate burden for protein quality control systems upon immediate stress, (iii) orchestrating chaperone and protease functions for efficient repair or degradation of damaged proteins [this involves initial extraction of aggregated molecules via the Hsp70/Hsp104 bi-chaperone system followed by either refolding or proteasomal degradation or removal of entire aggregates by selective autophagy (aggrephagy) involving the adaptor protein Cue5] and (iv) enabling asymmetric retention of protein aggregates during cell division, thereby allowing for damage clearance in daughter cells. Regulated protein aggregation thus serves cytoprotective functions vital for the maintenance of cell integrity and survival even under adverse stress conditions and during aging.


Subject(s)
Protein Aggregates , Protein Folding , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/metabolism , Stress, Physiological , Amino Acid Transport Systems/metabolism , Animals , Heat-Shock Proteins/metabolism , Humans
2.
EMBO J ; 34(6): 778-97, 2015 Mar 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25672362

ABSTRACT

Disruption of the functional protein balance in living cells activates protective quality control systems to repair damaged proteins or sequester potentially cytotoxic misfolded proteins into aggregates. The established model based on Saccharomyces cerevisiae indicates that aggregating proteins in the cytosol of eukaryotic cells partition between cytosolic juxtanuclear (JUNQ) and peripheral deposits. Substrate ubiquitination acts as the sorting principle determining JUNQ deposition and subsequent degradation. Here, we show that JUNQ unexpectedly resides inside the nucleus, defining a new intranuclear quality control compartment, INQ, for the deposition of both nuclear and cytosolic misfolded proteins, irrespective of ubiquitination. Deposition of misfolded cytosolic proteins at INQ involves chaperone-assisted nuclear import via nuclear pores. The compartment-specific aggregases, Btn2 (nuclear) and Hsp42 (cytosolic), direct protein deposition to nuclear INQ and cytosolic (CytoQ) sites, respectively. Intriguingly, Btn2 is transiently induced by both protein folding stress and DNA replication stress, with DNA surveillance proteins accumulating at INQ. Our data therefore reveal a bipartite, inter-compartmental protein quality control system linked to DNA surveillance via INQ and Btn2.


Subject(s)
Amino Acid Transport Systems/physiology , Cell Compartmentation/physiology , Cytosol/metabolism , Heat-Shock Proteins/physiology , Protein Aggregates/physiology , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/physiology , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/physiology , Amino Acid Transport Systems/metabolism , Blotting, Western , HeLa Cells , Heat-Shock Proteins/metabolism , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Microscopy, Fluorescence , Microscopy, Immunoelectron , Models, Biological , Protein Folding , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/metabolism , Time-Lapse Imaging , Ubiquitination
3.
J Cell Biol ; 195(4): 617-29, 2011 Nov 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22065637

ABSTRACT

The aggregation of proteins inside cells is an organized process with cytoprotective function. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, aggregating proteins are spatially sequestered to either juxtanuclear or peripheral sites, which target distinct quality control pathways for refolding and degradation. The cellular machinery driving the sequestration of misfolded proteins to these sites is unknown. In this paper, we show that one of the two small heat shock proteins of yeast, Hsp42, is essential for the formation of peripheral aggregates during physiological heat stress. Hsp42 preferentially localizes to peripheral aggregates but is largely absent from juxtanuclear aggregates, which still form in hsp42Δ cells. Transferring the amino-terminal domain of Hsp42 to Hsp26, which does not participate in aggregate sorting, enables Hsp26 to replace Hsp42 function. Our data suggest that Hsp42 acts via its amino-terminal domain to coaggregate with misfolded proteins and perhaps link such complexes to further sorting factors.


Subject(s)
Heat-Shock Proteins/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/metabolism , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/metabolism , Heat-Shock Proteins/chemistry , Hot Temperature , Protein Folding , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/cytology , Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins/chemistry
4.
Nature ; 455(7215): 984-7, 2008 Oct 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18923526

ABSTRACT

An important step in the biosynthesis of many proteins is their partial or complete translocation across the plasma membrane in prokaryotes or the endoplasmic reticulum membrane in eukaryotes. In bacteria, secretory proteins are generally translocated after completion of their synthesis by the interaction of the cytoplasmic ATPase SecA and a protein-conducting channel formed by the SecY complex. How SecA moves substrates through the SecY channel is unclear. However, a recent structure of a SecA-SecY complex raises the possibility that the polypeptide chain is moved by a two-helix finger domain of SecA that is inserted into the cytoplasmic opening of the SecY channel. Here we have used disulphide-bridge crosslinking to show that the loop at the tip of the two-helix finger of Escherichia coli SecA interacts with a polypeptide chain right at the entrance into the SecY pore. Mutagenesis demonstrates that a tyrosine in the loop is particularly important for translocation, but can be replaced by some other bulky, hydrophobic residues. We propose that the two-helix finger of SecA moves a polypeptide chain into the SecY channel with the tyrosine providing the major contact with the substrate, a mechanism analogous to that suggested for hexameric, protein-translocating ATPases.


Subject(s)
Adenosine Triphosphatases/chemistry , Adenosine Triphosphatases/metabolism , Bacterial Proteins/chemistry , Bacterial Proteins/metabolism , Escherichia coli/enzymology , Membrane Transport Proteins/chemistry , Membrane Transport Proteins/metabolism , Adenosine Triphosphatases/genetics , Amino Acid Motifs , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Cross-Linking Reagents , Disulfides/chemistry , Disulfides/metabolism , Escherichia coli Proteins/chemistry , Escherichia coli Proteins/metabolism , Membrane Transport Proteins/genetics , Models, Biological , Models, Molecular , Protein Conformation , Protein Transport , SEC Translocation Channels , SecA Proteins , Structure-Activity Relationship , Tyrosine/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...