Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Transplantation ; 91(3): 360-6, 2011 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21344706

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that the age of human organ donors might influence islet isolation and transplantation outcome in a negative way due to a decrease of in vivo function in islets isolated from older donors. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 332 islet isolations according to donor age. We determined isolation outcome by islet yields, transplantation rates, and [beta]-cell function in vitro. Transplanted patients were divided into two groups depending on donor age (n=25 and n=31 patients for <=45- and >45-year-old donors, respectively). We assessed islet graft function by C-peptide/glucose ratio, [beta] score, secretory units of islets in transplantation index, and insulin independence rate at 1, 6, and 12 months after transplantation. RESULTS: There was no difference in islet yields between the two groups (251,900+/-14,100 and 244,600+/-8400 islet equivalent for <=45- and >45-year-old donors, respectively). Transplantation rates and stimulation indices were similar in both groups as well. All islet graft function parameters were significantly higher at 1-month follow-up in patients who had received islets from younger donors. At 6-month follow-up after second or third injection and at 12-month follow-up, secretory units of islets in transplantation indices and C-peptide/glucose ratios were significantly higher in patients with donors aged 45 years or younger. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that, despite similar outcomes of the isolation procedure, islet graft function is significantly influenced by donor age. These results may have important consequences in the definition of pancreas allocation criteria.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/surgery , Islets of Langerhans Transplantation/physiology , Islets of Langerhans/physiology , Islets of Langerhans/surgery , Tissue Donors , Adult , Age Factors , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Insulin/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
Gynecol Oncol ; 107(3): 474-81, 2007 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17825392

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Allowing cancer patients to hold medical records containing essential information for managing their disease may improve their satisfaction and the coordination of their medical care. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine breast cancer patients' interest in and expectations of such medical records and the exchange of information during their treatment. METHODS: Eighty-six hospital physicians were selected to distribute an anonymous questionnaire to all of the breast cancer patients they saw in consultations. RESULTS: Out of 194 patients asked, 140 (72%) participated in the survey. Forty-eight percent were "highly satisfied", 47% were "quite satisfied" with their involvement in their treatment and 43% preferred to play a relatively passive role in decisions concerning treatments. When offered, 79% agreed to hold paper medical records containing test results, reports and letters. Many found these medical records to be useful and a possible means for improving communication. Others, however, expressed reservations concerning privacy or losing or forgetting the records. CONCLUSION: The principle of shared medical records could satisfy the majority of breast cancer patients. Experimenting with this concept in the field would enable practitioners to better determine the content of the records and how they can be used on a practical basis.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/psychology , Patient Access to Records/psychology , Aged , Decision Making , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Patient Participation/psychology , Patient Satisfaction , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Transplantation ; 84(1): 89-96, 2007 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17627243

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Whether islet transplantation should be aimed at restoring insulin independence or providing adequate metabolic control is still debated. The GRAGIL2 trial was designed as a phase 1-2 study where primary outcome was the rate of insulin independence, and secondary outcome was the success rate defined by a composite score based upon basal C-peptide, HbA1c, hypoglycemic events, and exogenous insulin needs. METHODS: C-peptide negative type 1 brittle diabetic patients experiencing severe hypoglycemia were eligible to receive a maximum of two islet preparations totalizing 10,000 IE/kg or more, with a threshold of 5,000 IE/kg for the first infusion, according to the Edmonton protocol, within the Swiss-French GRAGIL multicentric network. A sequential analysis with a triangular test was performed in every five patients after 6- and 12-month follow-up. Maximal inefficiency was set at 40% and minimal efficiency at 66%. RESULTS: From September 2003 to October 2005, 10 patients were included. Median waiting time was 6.7 months (first injection) and 9 weeks (second injection). All but one patient received 11,089+/-505 IE/kg: one received a single graft of 5398 IE/kg. At 6 months, insulin independence and composite success rates were 6 of 10 and 6 of 10, respectively. At 12 months, insulin independence was observed in 3 of 10 patients and success in 5 of 10 patients. CONCLUSION: Based upon our sequential analysis settings, islet transplantation failed to achieve the primary goal, insulin independence, but tended to succeed in reaching the secondary goal, successful metabolic control. Currently it appears to be a successful biological closed-loop glucose control method for brittle diabetes.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose/metabolism , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/metabolism , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/surgery , Hypoglycemia/physiopathology , Insulin/metabolism , Islets of Langerhans Transplantation/methods , Adult , Clinical Trials as Topic , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Insulin Secretion , Islets of Langerhans Transplantation/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Optic Nerve Diseases/chemically induced , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
4.
Bull Cancer ; 93(2): 223-31, 2006 Feb.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16517419

ABSTRACT

The multidisciplinary dimension which imposes the follow up of patients suffering from breast cancer raises difficulties of communication between community and hospital practitioners. The aim of this study was to assess information needs and expectations when the general practitioners and private gynecologists on one hand, and the hospital practitioners on the other hand, exchange medical information in the follow up of patients suffering from breast cancer. This descriptive study included a sample of 225 general practitioners and 216 gynecologists in private practice, and 233 hospital practitioners in the Rhone-Alps French region. Response rate was respectively 68 % (153), 64 % (139) and 42 % (99). This study showed different perceptions on the frequency of shared documents (reports, letters) or phone calls according to the speciality. In spite of a strongly felt partnership, an expectation of change was found with notably the wish of a stronger implication in the follow up and the wish to receive numerous information concerning the patients. The community practitioners expected to be more aware of the stage of the cancer, the prognosis and the level of information given to the patients. The hospital specialists expected to be informed about psychological problems or comorbidity. Pending the generalization of an electronic shared medical records, the experiment of a patient-held records may help to fulfil these expectations.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Family Practice , Gynecology , Interprofessional Relations , Medical Records , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Information Dissemination , Male
5.
Transplantation ; 79(9): 1200-5, 2005 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15880070

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Since the Edmonton trial in 2000, increasing numbers of transplant centers have been implementing islet transplantation programs. Some institutions have elected to associate in multicenter networks, such as the Swiss-French GRAGIL (Groupe Rhin-Rhône-Alpes-Genève pour la Transplantation d'Ilots de Langerhans) consortium. METHODS: All pancreata offers to the University of Geneva Cell Isolation and Transplantation Center from within the network in 2002 and 2003 were reviewed. Islet preparations were attributed to the most suitable recipient on a centrally managed waiting list. All shipments were performed by ambulance in less than 5 hr. RESULTS: Over the period of study, 260 pancreata were offered, from a total of 1,304 cadaveric donors in the four allocation regions (20%). Fifty-two patients were on the waiting list at any time during this 2-year period. The percentage of organs offered varied in the range of 0.5% to 42%, depending on region of origin, with a correlation with number of patients on the waiting list in each region. Of these, 104 (40%) were accepted for processing. Ninety-two pancreata were actually processed, resulting in 42 islet preparations being transplanted. The number of international equivalents of transplanted preparations was 378,500+/-16,000 versus 165,400+/-15,400 (P<0.0001) for nontransplanted preparations. Total cold ischemia time was 6+/-0.3 hr for transplanted preparations versus 6.7+/-0.4 hr for nontransplanted preparations (not significant). CONCLUSIONS.: A high rate of pancreas offers, successful isolation, and islet transplantation can be achieved in multicenter networks such as GRAGIL. Such an approach can expand both the donor pool and the recipient population.


Subject(s)
Islets of Langerhans Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Tissue and Organ Procurement/organization & administration , Adult , Cause of Death , Cell Separation/methods , France , Humans , Islets of Langerhans/cytology , Islets of Langerhans Transplantation/mortality , Middle Aged , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Resource Allocation , Switzerland , Treatment Outcome
6.
Transplantation ; 77(8): 1301-4, 2004 Apr 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15114103

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The influence of islet transportation on pancreatic islet allotransplantation in type 1 diabetic patients was evaluated within the GRAGIL network. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From December 2001 to April 2003, 16 human pancreatic islet transplants were performed in 9 type 1 diabetic patients with an established kidney graft (functioning for at least 6 months) in four centers of the GRAGIL network. Islet isolation was performed in a core laboratory in Geneva, and the islet preparations were shipped by ambulance to each center for transplantation. One month after transplantation, the efficiency of the graft was assessed according to islet transportation time (ITT): ITT less than 2 hours (group 1, n=5), and ITT greater than 4.5 hours (group 2, n=4, mediant 5 hours). RESULTS: Primary graft dysfunction was observed in one patient in group 1 after one month. Two patients became insulin independent in groups 1 and 2. All other patients in both groups had a plasma C-peptide level greater than 0.5 ng/ml. The HbA1c level and the exogenous insulin needs decreased in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: ITT does not seem to influence the efficiency of pancreatic islet allotransplantation in type 1 diabetic patients. These results emphasize the scope for multicenter networks such as the GRAGIL group.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/surgery , Islets of Langerhans Transplantation/methods , Tissue and Organ Procurement/methods , Adult , C-Peptide/blood , Creatinine/blood , Female , France , Glycated Hemoglobin/metabolism , Graft Survival , Humans , Islets of Langerhans Transplantation/physiology , Male , Middle Aged , Switzerland , Time Factors , Transportation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...