Medical Student Perspectives on the Ethics of Pelvic Exams Under Anesthesia: A Multi-Institutional Study✰.

OBJECTIVE: Pelvic examinations under anesthesia (EUAs) are routine components of gynecologic surgery and often used to educate students about female pelvic anatomy. This multi-institutional survey study aims to describe students' experiences with conducting educational pelvic EUAs and their attitudes around the ethics of informed consent for these exams. DESIGN: An anonymous survey of Likert and open-text response questions about institutions' practices around educational pelvic EUAs was sent to medical students. SETTING: Medical schools included Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Meharry Medical College, and Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University. PARTICIPANTS: A total 305 medical students who had completed their obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) clerkship between June 2019 and March 2020 filled out the survey (33% response rate). RESULTS: Overall, 84% of students performed at least 1 pelvic EUA during their clerkship. Of the 42% (142) of students that observed patient informed consent processes most or every time, 67% reported they never or rarely witnessed an explicit explanation that a medical student may perform a pelvic EUA. Analysis of open-text responses found that students wanted to uphold patient autonomy but felt they did not have the personal autonomy to object to performing pelvic EUAs that they believed were unconsented. They faced significant emotional distress when consent processes were at odds with their personal ethos and professional ethical norms. Students favored more standardized and explicit patient consent processes for educational pelvic EUAs. CONCLUSIONS: While students regularly perform pelvic EUAs, their involvement is inconsistently disclosed to patients, causing significant distress to students and risking erosion of students' attitudes about upholding patient autonomy and informed consent. Medical institutions must develop consistent, ethical, and patient-centered processes for trainee disclosure around pelvic EUAs.

A Physician-Led Communication Initiative to Inform OAB Patients of Dementia Risk Associated With Anticholinergic Medications.

OBJECTIVES: Anticholinergic medications are a core treatment strategy for overactive bladder (OAB). There is evidence that exposure to anticholinergic medications is associated with an increased risk of developing dementia. We launched an initiative to inform our patients of this risk and give them an opportunity to engage in shared decision-making about their treatment. This quality improvement initiative encompassed 3 aims: (1) to evaluate the feasibility of 2 different routes to deliver the written outreach; (2) to evaluate if and how patients changed their OAB treatment; and (3) to assess satisfaction with the outreach initiative. METHODS: A query was performed via the electronic medical record for all patients who had been prescribed an anticholinergic for treatment of OAB. We sent either electronic messages or traditional mail to patients. We contacted patients by telephone to assess if they received the message, were satisfied with their respective method of communication, and decided for ongoing treatment. Health care provider satisfaction was also measured. RESULTS: Of the 231 patients sent the outreach, 32 were still taking the anticholinergic at the time they received the communication. The majority of patients, 84.38%, were satisfied with the initiative and elected to change therapy after learning about the increased risk of dementia. The physicians also uniformly reported satisfaction with the initiative. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this outreach initiative resulted in an increase in patient counseling that led to a change in treatment for most patients. This initiative was received favorably by patients and health care providers.