Oral gepotidacin versus nitrofurantoin in patients with uncomplicated urinary tract infection (EAGLE-2 and EAGLE-3): two randomised, controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3, non-inferiority trials.

BACKGROUND: Gepotidacin is a novel, bactericidal, first-in-class triazaacenaphthylene antibiotic that inhibits bacterial DNA replication by a distinct mechanism of action and a unique binding site, providing well balanced inhibition of two type II topoisomerase enzymes. Oral gepotidacin is under investigation to treat uncomplicated urinary tract infections. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of oral gepotidacin with that of nitrofurantoin in adolescent and adult female individuals with uncomplicated urinary tract infections. METHODS: EAGLE-2 and EAGLE-3 were phase 3, randomised, multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, non-inferiority (10% margin) trials, in which patients were enrolled at 219 centres worldwide. Patients assigned female at birth, non-pregnant, aged 12 years or older, weighing 40 kg or more, with two or more symptoms of dysuria, frequency, urgency, or lower abdominal pain, and with evidence of urinary nitrite, pyuria, or both were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) centrally by interactive response technology to receive oral gepotidacin (1500 mg twice daily for 5 days) or oral nitrofurantoin (100 mg twice daily for 5 days), with randomisation stratified by age category and history of recurrent uncomplicated urinary tract infections. Patients, investigators, and the sponsor study team were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint, therapeutic response (success or failure) at test-of-cure (ie, day 10-13), was evaluated in randomly assigned patients with nitrofurantoin-susceptible qualifying uropathogens (≥105 colony-forming units [CFU] per mL) and who received at least one dose of study treatment. Conforming to regulatory guidance, therapeutic success was defined as combined clinical success (ie, complete symptom resolution) and microbiological success (ie, reduction of qualifying uropathogens to <103 CFU/mL) without other systemic antimicrobial use. Safety analyses included patients who were randomly assigned and who received at least one dose of study treatment. The trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04020341 (EAGLE-2) and NCT04187144 (EAGLE-3), and are completed. FINDINGS: Studies were undertaken from Oct 17, 2019, to Nov 30, 2022 (EAGLE-2), and from April 23, 2020, to Dec 1, 2022 (EAGLE-3). 1680 patients in EAGLE-2 and 1731 patients in EAGLE-3 were screened for eligibility, of whom 1531 and 1605 were randomly assigned, respectively (767 in the gepotidacin group and 764 in the nitrofurantoin group in EAGLE-2, and 805 in the gepotidacin group and 800 in the nitrofurantoin group in EAGLE-3). After an interim analysis, which was prospectively agreed as a protocol amendment, both studies were stopped for efficacy. Thus, the primary analysis population included only patients who, at the time of the interim analysis data cutoff, had the opportunity to reach the test-of-cure visit or were known to not have attained therapeutic success before the test-of-cure visit. In EAGLE-2, 162 (50·6%) of 320 patients assigned gepotidacin and 135 (47·0%) of 287 patients assigned nitrofurantoin had therapeutic success (adjusted difference 4·3%, 95% CI -3·6 to 12·1). In EAGLE-3, 162 (58·5%) of 277 patients assigned gepotidacin and 115 (43·6%) of 264 patients assigned nitrofurantoin had therapeutic success (adjusted difference 14·6%, 95% CI 6·4 to 22·8). Gepotidacin was non-inferior to nitrofurantoin in both studies and superior to nitrofurantoin in EAGLE-3. The most common adverse event with gepotidacin was diarrhoea (observed in 111 [14%] of 766 patients in EAGLE-2 and in 147 [18%] of 804 patients in EAGLE-3), whereas the most common adverse event with nitrofurantoin was nausea (in 29 [4%] of 760 patients in EAGLE-2 and in 35 [4%] of 798 patients in EAGLE-3). Cases were mostly mild or moderate. No life-threatening or fatal events occurred. INTERPRETATION: Gepotidacin is an efficacious oral antibiotic with acceptable safety and tolerability profiles. As a first-in-class investigational oral antibiotic with activity against common uropathogens, including clinically important drug-resistant phenotypes, gepotidacin has the potential to offer substantial benefit to patients. FUNDING: GSK and the US Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority.

Efficacy and Safety of Gepotidacin as Treatment of Uncomplicated Urogenital Gonorrhea (EAGLE-1): Design of a Randomized, Comparator-Controlled, Phase 3 Study.

INTRODUCTION: Gonorrhea, caused by Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), is the second most common bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI). Rates of antimicrobial resistance to standard care are increasing worldwide, with many antibiotic classes now ineffective against NG. Gepotidacin is a first-in-class, bactericidal, triazaacenaphthylene antibiotic that inhibits bacterial DNA replication by inhibition of two enzymes, where a single target-specific mutation does not significantly impact susceptibility. Gepotidacin confers activity against NG, including most strains resistant to marketed antibiotics. Here, we describe the design of a phase 3 clinical trial (EAGLE-1; NCT04010539) evaluating gepotidacin for the treatment of uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhea. METHODS: This phase 3, randomized, multicenter, sponsor-blinded, noninferiority study across six countries is comparing the efficacy of gepotidacin with ceftriaxone plus azithromycin in 400 patients with uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhea (microbiological intent-to-treat population) and assessing the safety of gepotidacin in approximately 600 patients (intent-to-treat population). Eligible participants 12 years of age or older with clinical suspicion of urogenital gonococcal infection and a NG-positive urogenital sample and/or purulent discharge are randomized 1:1 to receive oral gepotidacin (2 × 3000 mg 10-12 h apart) or ceftriaxone (500 mg, intramuscular) plus azithromycin (1 g, oral). The primary endpoint is culture-confirmed bacterial eradication of NG from the urogenital site at the test-of-cure (days 4-8) visit. PLANNED OUTCOMES: This trial was designed in accordance with US Food and Drug Administration (2015) and European Medicines Agency (2011) guidance, particularly the primary endpoint and microbiological evaluability requirements. This study will help characterize the risk-benefit profile of gepotidacin for treating uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhea. Gepotidacin is an important potential treatment for gonorrhea to help address the urgent unmet need of multidrug resistance and the increasingly limited number of oral treatment options. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04010539.

Selective androgen receptor modulation for muscle weakness in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised control trial.

BACKGROUND: Selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) increase muscle mass via the androgen receptor. This phase 2A trial investigated the effects of a SARM, GSK2881078, in conjunction with exercise, on leg strength in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and impaired physical function. METHODS: 47 postmenopausal women and 50 men with COPD (forced expiratory volume in 1 s 30%-65% predicted; short physical performance battery score: 3-11) were enrolled into a randomised double-blind, placebo control trial. Patients were randomised 1:1 to once daily placebo or oral GSK2881078 (females: 1.0 mg; males: 2.0 mg) for 13 weeks with a concurrent home-exercise programme, involving strength training and physical activity. Primary endpoints were change from baseline in leg strength at 90 days (one-repetition maximum; absolute (kg) and relative (% change)) and multiple safety outcomes. Secondary endpoints included lean body mass, physical function and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: GSK2881078 increased leg strength in men. The difference in adjusted mean change from baseline and adjusted mean percentage change from baseline between treatment and placebo were: for women, 8.0 kg (90% CI -2.5 to 18.4) and 5.2% (90% CI -4.7 to 15.0), respectively; for men, 11.8 kg (90% CI -0.5 to 24.0) and 7.0% (90% CI 0.5 to 13.6), respectively. Lean body mass increased, but no changes in patient-reported outcomes were observed. Reversible reductions in high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and transient elevations in hepatic transaminases were the main treatment-related safety findings. CONCLUSIONS: GSK2881078 was well tolerated and short-term treatment increased leg strength, when expressed as per cent predicted, in men with COPD more than physical training alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03359473.

An observational, non-interventional study for the follow-up of patients with amyloidosis who received miridesap followed by dezamizumab in a phase 1 study.

BACKGROUND: Miridesap depletes circulating serum amyloid P (SAP) and dezamizumab (anti-SAP monoclonal antibody) targets SAP on amyloid deposits, triggering amyloid removal. In a phase 1, first-in-human study (FIHS), progressive amyloid removal was observed in some patients after ≤ 3 cycles of miridesap/dezamizumab. METHODS: This observational, non-interventional study in patients who received miridesap/dezamizumab during the FIHS (planned follow-up: 5 years) evaluated response to treatment based on routine assessments of disease status and key organ function. In a post hoc analysis, patients responding to treatment in the FIHS during follow-up were identified as responders and further categorized as sustained or declining responders. RESULTS: In the FIHS, 17/23 patients were treatment responders. Of these patients, seven (immunoglobulin light chain [AL], n = 6; serum amyloid A, n = 1) were considered sustained responders and ten (fibrinogen-a alpha chain [AFib], n = 5; AL, n = 4; apolipoprotein A-I, n = 1) were considered declining responders. We primarily present responder patient-level data for functional, cardiac, laboratory and imaging assessments conducted during the follow-up period, with non-responder data presented as supplementary. CONCLUSION: No further development of miridesap/dezamizumab is planned in amyloidosis. However, long-term follow-up of these patients may provide insight into whether active removal of amyloid deposits has an impact on disease progression. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01777243. Registered 28 January 2013, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT01777243 .

Pharmacodynamic evaluation and safety assessment of treatment with antibodies to serum amyloid P component in patients with cardiac amyloidosis: an open-label Phase 2 study and an adjunctive immuno-PET imaging study.

BACKGROUND: In a Phase I study treatment with the serum amyloid P component (SAP) depleter miridesap followed by monoclonal antibody to SAP (dezamizumab) showed removal of amyloid from liver, spleen and kidney in patients with systemic amyloidosis. We report results from a Phase 2 study and concurrent immuno-positron emission tomography (PET) study assessing efficacy, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, safety and cardiac uptake (of dezamizumab) following the same intervention in patients with cardiac amyloidosis. METHODS: Both were uncontrolled open-label studies. After SAP depletion with miridesap, patients received ≤ 6 monthly doses of dezamizumab in the Phase 2 trial (n = 7), ≤ 2 doses of non-radiolabelled dezamizumab plus [89Zr]Zr-dezamizumab (total mass dose of 80 mg at session 1 and 500 mg at session 2) in the immuno-PET study (n = 2). Primary endpoints of the Phase 2 study were changed from baseline to follow-up (at 8 weeks) in left ventricular mass (LVM) by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and safety. Primary endpoint of the immuno-PET study was [89Zr]Zr-dezamizumab cardiac uptake assessed via PET. RESULTS: Dezamizumab produced no appreciable or consistent reduction in LVM nor improvement in cardiac function in the Phase 2 study. In the immuno-PET study, measurable cardiac uptake of [89Zr]Zr-dezamizumab, although seen in both patients, was moderate to low. Uptake was notably lower in the patient with higher LVM. Treatment-associated rash with cutaneous small-vessel vasculitis was observed in both studies. Abdominal large-vessel vasculitis after initial dezamizumab dosing (300 mg) occurred in the first patient with immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis enrolled in the Phase 2 study. Symptom resolution was nearly complete within 24 h of intravenous methylprednisolone and dezamizumab discontinuation; abdominal computed tomography imaging showed vasculitis resolution by 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike previous observations of visceral amyloid reduction, there was no appreciable evidence of amyloid removal in patients with cardiac amyloidosis in this Phase 2 trial, potentially related to limited cardiac uptake of dezamizumab as demonstrated in the immuno-PET study. The benefit-risk assessment for dezamizumab in cardiac amyloidosis was considered unfavourable after the incidence of large-vessel vasculitis and development for this indication was terminated. Trial registration NCT03044353 (2 February 2017) and NCT03417830 (25 January 2018).

Full central neurokinin-1 receptor blockade is required for efficacy in depression: evidence from orvepitant clinical studies.

Full, persistent blockade of central neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptors may be a potential antidepressant mechanism. The selective NK1 antagonist orvepitant (GW823296) was used to test this hypothesis. A preliminary positron emission tomography study in eight male volunteers drove dose selection for two randomized six week studies in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Displacement of central [(11)C]GR205171 binding indicated that oral orvepitant doses of 30-60 mg/day provided >99% receptor occupancy for ≥24 h. Studies 733 and 833 randomized patients with MDD and 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D)≥22 to double-blind treatment with orvepitant 30 mg/day, orvepitant 60 mg/day or placebo (1:1:1). Primary outcome measure was change from baseline in 17-item HAM-D total score at Week 6 analyzed using mixed models repeated measures. Study 733 (n=328) demonstrated efficacy on the primary endpoint (estimated drug-placebo differences of 30 mg: -2.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) (-4.50 to -0.31) p=0.0245; 60 mg: -2.86, 95% CI (-4.97 to -0.75) p=0.0082). Study 833 (n=345) did not show significance (estimated drug-placebo differences of 30 mg: -1.67, 95% CI (-3.73 to 0.39) p=0.1122; 60 mg: -0.76, 95% CI (-2.85 to 1.32) p=0.4713). The results support the hypothesis that full, long lasting blockade of central NK1 receptors may be an efficacious mechanism for the treatment of MDD.