Review of Public Transport Needs of Older People in European Context.

People's life expectancy is increasing throughout the world as a result of improved living standards and medical advances. The natural ageing process is accompanied by physiological changes which can have significant consequences for mobility. As a consequence, older people tend to make fewer journeys than other adults and may change their transport mode. Access to public transport can help older people to avail themselves of goods, services, employment and other activities. With the current generation of older people being more active than previous generations of equivalent age, public transport will play a crucial role in maintaining their active life style even when they are unable to drive. Hence, public transport is important to older people's quality of life, their sense of freedom and independence. Within the European Commission funded GOAL (Growing Older and staying mobile) project, the requirements of older people using public transport were studied in terms of four main issues: Affordability, availability, accessibility and acceptability. These requirements were then analysed in terms of five different profiles of older people defined within the GOAL project - 'Fit as a Fiddle', 'Hole in the Heart', 'Happily Connected', An 'Oldie but a Goodie' and 'Care-Full'. On the basis of the analysis the paper brings out some areas of knowledge gaps and research needed to make public transport much more attractive and used by older people in the 21st century.

Early detection of neutralizing antibodies to interferon-beta in multiple sclerosis patients: binding antibodies predict neutralizing antibody development.

BACKGROUND: Neutralizing antibodies (NAb) affect efficacy of interferon-beta (IFN-b) treatment in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. NAbs evolve in up to 44% of treated patients, usually between 6-18 months on therapy. OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether early binding antibody (BAb) titers or different IFN-b biomarkers predict NAb evolution. METHODS: We included patients with MS or clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) receiving de novo IFN-b treatment in this prospective European multicenter study. Blood samples were collected at baseline, before and after the first IFN-b administration, and again after 3, 12 and 24 months on that therapy; for determination of NAbs, BAbs, gene expression of MxA and protein concentrations of MMP-9, TIMP-1, sTRAIL, CXCL-10 and CCL-2. RESULTS: We found that 22 of 164 (13.4%) patients developed NAbs during a median time of 23.8 months on IFN-b treatment. Of these patients, 78.9% were BAb-positive after 3 months. BAb titers ≥ 1:2400 predicted NAb evolution with a sensitivity of 74.7% and a specificity of 98.5%. Cross-sectionally, MxA levels were significantly diminished in the BAb/NAb-positive samples; similarly, CXCL-10 and sTRAIL concentrations in BAb/NAb-positive and BAb-positive/NAb-negative samples, respectively, were also diminished compared to BAb/NAb-negative samples. CONCLUSIONS: BAb titers reliably predict NAbs. CXCL-10 is a promising sensitive biomarker for IFN-b response and its abrogation by anti-IFN-b antibodies.

High-dose intravenous interferon beta in patients with neutralizing antibodies (HINABS): a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Neutralizing antibodies (NABs) against interferon beta (IFNbeta) are associated with a loss of IFNbeta bioactivity and clinical effectiveness. To date, there are no anti-NAB strategies available. The primary objective of this trial was to investigate whether intravenous IFNbeta-1b can restore bioactivity in NAB-positive patients with MS. METHODS: NAB-positive patients with MS were treated with 8 MIU IFNbeta-1b s.c., 8 MIU i.v., and 16 MIU i.v. Each application was preceded by a wash-out period of 1 week. Blood samples were collected before, 3, 12, and 24 h after each administration. Myxovirus protein A (MxA) RNA and protein levels were determined. The study has been approved by the local ethics committee. RESULTS: Five patients completed the study. NAB titers ranged from 42 to 4482 neutralizing units. Median MxA protein (1821, range 12-3234) and RNA (2186, range 114-7525) area under the curve levels for the four measurements at each IFNbeta injection were significantly higher after i.v. application of 16 MIU as compared with both 8-MIU dosages, which were 743 (0-2709) for MxA protein after 8 MIU i.v. and 254 (0-1200) after s.c., and 1763 (25-7188) for MxA RNA after 8 MIU i.v., and 557 (5-2265) after s.c. applications. NAB titers decreased significantly and transiently after infusion of 16 MIU IFNbeta-1b but not after both forms of 8 MIU applications. Typical side effects could be controlled by paracetamol. No allergic reaction was observed. DISCUSSION: The results indicate that i.v. administration of IFNbeta can restore bioavailability of IFNbeta in patients with NABs.

MxA protein--an interferon beta biomarker in primary progressive multiple sclerosis patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Interferon beta (IFNbeta) preparations have some effect on the progressive phase of multiple sclerosis (MS). This limited effect might be partially because of a certain number of IFNbeta non-responders. Myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA)--a marker of IFNbeta bioactivity--was correlated with the clinical response during an uncontrolled trial, investigating the safety of IFNbeta-1b in primary progressive (PPMS) patients. METHODS: Twenty PPMS were treated with IFNbeta-1b (s.c.) for 1 year. Blood samples were taken before and 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 months after treatment initiation and MxA protein levels were measured. Patients were clinically evaluated by EDSS and the more sensitive Incapacity Status Scale (ISS) and stratified in a stable and a progressing group. RESULTS: Using ISS criteria, 11 patients remained stable and nine patients progressed during treatment. The mean area under the curve of log MxA levels during treatment were significantly higher in stable than in progressing patients (10.87 vs. 5.99; P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: A good biological response to IFNbeta might be associated with a better clinical effect of this drug and could be helpful in future clinical studies for early identification of treatment responders.

Comparative study of four different assays for the detection of binding antibodies against interferon-beta.

BACKGROUND: Binding antibodies (BAB) against interferon-beta (IFNbeta) are often determined as screening assays before performing an expensive and elaborate neutralizing antibody (NAB) test. METHODS: In this study, we compared four BAB tests, a western blot (WB), a direct binding enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (dELISA), a capture ELISA (cELISA), and a commercial enzyme immuno-assay (EIA) in 325 multiple sclerosis patients with and without neutralizing antibodies to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity to detect NAB by receiver operating characteristics analysis. RESULTS: The area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.907 for the dELISA, 0.925 for the cELISA, and 0.776 for the EIA (P < 0.0001 for all). At a sensitivity of 95%, the specificity was approximately 30% in the dELISA, 55% in the cELISA, and 13% in the EIA. The WB as a qualitative BAB detection method had a given sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 55%. There was a strong and significant correlation between high NAB titers (>500 neutralizing units [NU]) and titers obtained by all quantitative BAB assays. However, low to medium NAB titers (20-500 NU) did not significantly correlate with BAB titers. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the cELISA seems to be most suitable for NAB screening, but BAB titers cannot reliably predict NAB titers.