Search | VHL Regional Portal

Reactions to the National Academies/Royal Society Report on Heritable Human Genome Editing.

Angrist, Misha; Barrangou, Rodolphe; Baylis, Françoise; Brokowski, Carolyn; Burgio, Gaetan; Caplan, Arthur; Chapman, Carolyn Riley; Church, George M; Cook-Deegan, Robert; Cwik, Bryan; Doudna, Jennifer A; Evans, John H; Greely, Henry T; Hercher, Laura; Hurlbut, J Benjamin; Hynes, Richard O; Ishii, Tetsuya; Kiani, Samira; Lee, LaTasha Hoskins; Levrier, Guillaume; Liu, David R; Lunshof, Jeantine E; Macintosh, Kerry Lynn; Mathews, Debra J H; Meslin, Eric M; Mills, Peter H R; Montoliu, Lluis; Musunuru, Kiran; Nicol, Dianne; O'Neill, Helen; Qiu, Renzong; Ranisch, Robert; Sherkow, Jacob S; Soni, Sheetal; Terry, Sharon; Topol, Eric; Williamson, Robert; Zhang, Feng; Davies, Kevin.

CRISPR J ; 3(5): 332-349, 2020 10.

Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33095048

ABSTRACT

In September 2020, a detailed report on Heritable Human Genome Editing was published. The report offers a translational pathway for the limited approval of germline editing under limited circumstances and assuming various criteria have been met. In this perspective, some three dozen experts from the fields of genome editing, medicine, bioethics, law, and related fields offer their candid reactions to the National Academies/Royal Society report, highlighting areas of support, omissions, disagreements, and priorities moving forward.

Subject(s)

Gene Editing/ethics , Genome, Human , Human Experimentation/ethics , Academies and Institutes , Germ Cells , Humans , Research Report , Societies

ABSTRACT

Subject(s)

SEND TO:

SELECTION OF CITATIONS

SEARCH DETAIL