Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
2.
Dermatitis ; 25(6): 366-9, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25384226

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Contact urticaria (CU) is the development of a wheal and flare on the skin after topical exposure to a particular chemical or compound. It can be diagnosed through a variety of techniques. Many chemicals that cause a type IV allergy can also cause CU. The incidence of CU to these chemicals is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the opinions of the American Contact Dermatitis Society members regarding CU and scratch testing. METHODS: We distributed an electronic survey to the American Contact Dermatitis Society members regarding observed prevalence of CU, frequency of scratch testing in clinical practice, and interest in learning about scratch testing in diagnosing CU and other skin contact conditions. RESULTS: We distributed 508 surveys and received 133 responses. Seventeen percent reported that CU was extremely rare, 32% reported that CU was rare, and 38.9% reported that CU was infrequent. Alternatively, 10.7% believed that CU was common, and 1.5% believed that CU was extremely common. A minority, 19.1%, performed scratch testing on patients with suspected CU. Most respondents, 54.6%, were interested in learning about scratch testing. CONCLUSIONS: Additional education regarding scratch testing could increase comfort and use of scratch testing in clinical practice. Further studies are needed to evaluate the prevalence of CU in the general population and better guide the use of testing for dermatologic patients.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatology , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Skin Tests , Urticaria/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Humans , Prevalence , United States/epidemiology , Urticaria/epidemiology
3.
Dermatol Online J ; 20(3)2014 Mar 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24656264

ABSTRACT

A pyogenic granuloma (PG) is a rapidly growing benign vascular tumor that can be found on the skin or subcutaneous tissue. While some pyogenic granulomas may resolve spontaneously, most have a tendency to bleed easily and require treatment. Current therapeutic modalities include topical imiquimod, cryotherapy, electrodessication, curettage, excision, laser therapy, sclerotherapy, and microembolization. We report a recalcitrant case of chronic pyogenic granuloma occurring on the scalp of a healthy young male which was unresponsive to conventional surgical and non-surgical modalities. Ultimately, aggressive laser therapy, intralesional triamcinolone acetonide injections, and topical timolol application led to complete resolution and healing.


Subject(s)
Granuloma, Pyogenic/surgery , Laser Therapy , Lasers, Dye/therapeutic use , Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use , Scalp Dermatoses/therapy , Administration, Cutaneous , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Adult , Aminoquinolines/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Biopsy , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Combined Modality Therapy , Drug Therapy, Combination , Granuloma, Pyogenic/diagnosis , Granuloma, Pyogenic/drug therapy , Granuloma, Pyogenic/pathology , Humans , Imiquimod , Male , Recurrence , Scalp Dermatoses/drug therapy , Timolol/therapeutic use , Triamcinolone Acetonide/administration & dosage , Triamcinolone Acetonide/therapeutic use
4.
Dermatol Ther ; 26(4): 347-53, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23914892

ABSTRACT

Many women of childbearing age use prescription and non-prescription medications. Therefore, patients need to be counseled regarding the potential teratogenicity of medications if they are, or could become, pregnant. In this editorial, the present authors will explain the three advantages of the evidence-based medicine system when compared with the US Food and Drug Administration system for medication risk classification in pregnancy. The present authors will also comment on medication use during lactation and provide resources on medication use during pregnancy and lactation for clinicians and their patients.


Subject(s)
Counseling , Dermatologic Agents/adverse effects , Evidence-Based Medicine , Lactation , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapy , Dermatologic Agents/classification , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Risk
5.
Dermatol Ther ; 26(4): 337-46, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23914891

ABSTRACT

Many drugs have been reported to impair semen parameters, leading to temporary or persistent infertility. Therefore, potential fathers may be concerned about the effect of medications on fertility. We searched the MEDLINE database of articles in English combining key terms including "male infertility," "spermatogenesis," "fertility," "drug effects," and "dermatology." Administration of methotrexate and finasteride has resulted in severe oligospermia and reversible infertility. Ketoconazole has had negative effects on sperm motility and testosterone production. Few individual case reports and a limited number of studies have demonstrated negative effects of tetracyclines, erythromycin, chloroquine, glucocorticoids, spironolactone, and antihistamines on fertility. It is important to counsel male patients when appropriate about the reversible negative effect on fertility when taking methotrexate and finasteride, and the adverse effect of ketoconazole. Patients may be reassured that taking oral retinoids, cyclosporine, azathioprine, and tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors should not affect their fertility.


Subject(s)
Dermatologic Agents/adverse effects , Infertility, Male/chemically induced , Acitretin/adverse effects , Anti-Infective Agents/adverse effects , Azathioprine/adverse effects , Cyclosporine/adverse effects , Finasteride/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Methotrexate/adverse effects , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...