Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Community Psychol ; 69(1-2): 145-156, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34534371

ABSTRACT

Báa nnilah is a chronic illness self-management program designed by and for the Apsáalooke (Crow) community. Arising from a collaboration between an Indigenous nonprofit organization and a university-based research team, Báa nnilah's development, implementation, and evaluation have been influenced by both Indigenous and Western research paradigms (WRPs). Báa nnilah was evaluated using a randomized wait-list control group design. In a WRP, contamination, or intervention information shared by the intervention group with the control group, is actively discouraged as it makes ascertaining causality difficult, if not impossible. This approach is not consonant with Apsáalooke cultural values that include the encouragement of sharing helpful information with others, supporting an Indigenous research paradigm's (IRP) goal of benefiting the community. The purpose of this paper is to address contamination and sharing as an area of tension between WRP and IRP. We describe how the concepts of contamination and sharing within Báa nnilah's implementation and evaluation are interpreted differently when viewed from these contrasting paradigms, and set forth a call for greater exploration of Indigenous research approaches for developing, implementing, and evaluating intervention programs in Indigenous communities. (Improving Chronic Illness Management with the Apsáalooke Nation: The Báa nnilah Project.: NCT03036189), ClinicalTrials. gov: NCT03036189).


Subject(s)
Health Services, Indigenous , Population Groups , Chronic Disease , Humans , Universities
2.
Soc Sci Med ; 242: 112583, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31622915

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: Since 1996, members of the Apsáalooke (Crow) Nation and faculty and students at Montana State University have worked in a successful community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnership, leading to increased trust and improvements in health awareness, knowledge, and behaviors. As major barriers to health and healthy behaviors have caused inequities in morbidity and mortality rates for multiple chronic diseases among the Apsáalooke people, community members chose to focus the next phase of research on improving chronic illness management. OBJECTIVE: Existing chronic illness self-management programs include aspects inconsonant with Apsáalooke culture and neglect local factors seen as vital to community members managing their health conditions. The aim of this study was to use CBPR methods grounded in Apsáalooke cultural values to develop an intervention for improving chronic illness self-management. METHOD: Community members shared stories about what it is like to manage their chronic illness, including facilitators and barriers to chronic illness management. A culturally consonant data analysis method was used to develop a locally-based conceptual framework for understanding chronic illness management and an intervention grounded in the local culture. RESULTS: Components of the intervention approach and intervention content are detailed and similarities and differences from other chronic illness management programs are described. CONCLUSIONS: Our collaborative process and product may be helpful for other communities interested in using story data to develop research projects, deepen their understanding of health, and increase health equity.


Subject(s)
Chronic Disease/therapy , Indians, North American/psychology , Self-Management/psychology , Chronic Disease/ethnology , Chronic Disease/psychology , Community-Based Participatory Research , Humans , Indians, North American/ethnology , Indians, North American/statistics & numerical data , Interviews as Topic/methods , Montana/ethnology , Qualitative Research , Self-Management/statistics & numerical data , Universities/organization & administration , Universities/statistics & numerical data
3.
One Health ; 3: 41-43, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28616502

ABSTRACT

A high percentage (up to 90%) of dromedary camels in the Middle East as well as eastern and central Africa have antibodies to Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV). Here we report comparably high positivity of MERS-CoV antibodies in dromedary camels from northern Mali. This extends the range of MERS-CoV further west in Africa than reported to date and cautions that MERS-CoV should be considered in cases of severe respiratory disease in the region.

4.
Sci Rep ; 6: 21878, 2016 Feb 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26899616

ABSTRACT

The emergence of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) highlights the zoonotic potential of Betacoronaviruses. Investigations into the origin of MERS-CoV have focused on two potential reservoirs: bats and camels. Here, we investigated the role of bats as a potential reservoir for MERS-CoV. In vitro, the MERS-CoV spike glycoprotein interacted with Jamaican fruit bat (Artibeus jamaicensis) dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) receptor and MERS-CoV replicated efficiently in Jamaican fruit bat cells, suggesting there is no restriction at the receptor or cellular level for MERS-CoV. To shed light on the intrinsic host-virus relationship, we inoculated 10 Jamaican fruit bats with MERS-CoV. Although all bats showed evidence of infection, none of the bats showed clinical signs of disease. Virus shedding was detected in the respiratory and intestinal tract for up to 9 days. MERS-CoV replicated transiently in the respiratory and, to a lesser extent, the intestinal tracts and internal organs; with limited histopathological changes observed only in the lungs. Analysis of the innate gene expression in the lungs showed a moderate, transient induction of expression. Our results indicate that MERS-CoV maintains the ability to replicate in bats without clinical signs of disease, supporting the general hypothesis of bats as ancestral reservoirs for MERS-CoV.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/veterinary , Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus/physiology , Virus Replication , Virus Shedding , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Chiroptera/virology , Chlorocebus aethiops , Coronavirus Infections/blood , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Cricetinae , Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4/metabolism , Immunity, Innate , Lung/pathology , Lung/virology , Receptors, Virus/metabolism , Vero Cells , Viral Load
5.
J Virol ; 88(16): 9220-32, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24899185

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) emerged in 2012. Recently, the MERS-CoV receptor dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) was identified and the specific interaction of the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of MERS-CoV spike protein and DPP4 was determined by crystallography. Animal studies identified rhesus macaques but not hamsters, ferrets, or mice to be susceptible for MERS-CoV. Here, we investigated the role of DPP4 in this observed species tropism. Cell lines of human and nonhuman primate origin were permissive of MERS-CoV, whereas hamster, ferret, or mouse cell lines were not, despite the presence of DPP4. Expression of human DPP4 in nonsusceptible BHK and ferret cells enabled MERS-CoV replication, whereas expression of hamster or ferret DPP4 did not. Modeling the binding energies of MERS-CoV spike protein RBD to DPP4 of human (susceptible) or hamster (nonsusceptible) identified five amino acid residues involved in the DPP4-RBD interaction. Expression of hamster DPP4 containing the five human DPP4 amino acids rendered BHK cells susceptible to MERS-CoV, whereas expression of human DPP4 containing the five hamster DPP4 amino acids did not. Using the same approach, the potential of MERS-CoV to utilize the DPP4s of common Middle Eastern livestock was investigated. Modeling of the DPP4 and MERS-CoV RBD interaction predicted the ability of MERS-CoV to bind the DPP4s of camel, goat, cow, and sheep. Expression of the DPP4s of these species on BHK cells supported MERS-CoV replication. This suggests, together with the abundant DPP4 presence in the respiratory tract, that these species might be able to function as a MERS-CoV intermediate reservoir. IMPORTANCE: The ongoing outbreak of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) has caused 701 laboratory-confirmed cases to date, with 249 fatalities. Although bats and dromedary camels have been identified as potential MERS-CoV hosts, the virus has so far not been isolated from any species other than humans. The inability of MERS-CoV to infect commonly used animal models, such as hamster, mice, and ferrets, indicates the presence of a species barrier. We show that the MERS-CoV receptor DPP4 plays a pivotal role in the observed species tropism of MERS-CoV and subsequently identified the amino acids in DPP4 responsible for this restriction. Using a combined modeling and experimental approach, we predict that, based on the ability of MERS-CoV to utilize the DPP4 of common Middle East livestock species, such as camels, goats, sheep, and cows, these form a potential MERS-CoV intermediate host reservoir species.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus/pathogenicity , Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4/metabolism , Host Specificity , Receptors, Virus/metabolism , Respiratory Syncytial Viruses/pathogenicity , Animals , Camelus/metabolism , Camelus/virology , Cattle , Cell Line , Cell Line, Tumor , Coronavirus/metabolism , Cricetinae , Ferrets/metabolism , Ferrets/virology , Goats/metabolism , Goats/virology , Humans , Livestock/metabolism , Livestock/virology , Macaca mulatta/metabolism , Macaca mulatta/virology , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Middle East , Primates/metabolism , Primates/virology , Protein Binding , Receptors, Coronavirus , Respiratory Syncytial Viruses/metabolism , Sheep/metabolism , Sheep/virology , Vero Cells , Viral Tropism , Virus Replication/genetics
6.
Pathog Dis ; 71(2): 121-36, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24585737

ABSTRACT

On September 20, 2012, a Saudi Arabian physician reported the isolation of a novel coronavirus from a patient with pneumonia on ProMED-mail. Within a few days, the same virus was detected in a Qatari patient receiving intensive care in a London hospital, a situation reminiscent of the role air travel played in the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) in 2002. SARS-CoV originated in China's Guangdong Province and affected more than 8000 patients in 26 countries before it was contained 6 months later. Over a year after the emergence of this novel coronavirus--Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV)--it has caused 178 laboratory-confirmed cases and 76 deaths. The emergence of a second highly pathogenic coronavirus within a decade highlights the importance of a coordinated global response incorporating reservoir surveillance, high-containment capacity with fundamental and applied research programs, and dependable communication pathways to ensure outbreak containment. Here, we review the current state of knowledge on the epidemiology, ecology, molecular biology, clinical features, and intervention strategies of the novel coronavirus, MERS-CoV.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus/genetics , Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus/isolation & purification , Zoonoses/epidemiology , Zoonoses/virology , Animals , Coronavirus Infections/pathology , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Humans , Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus/classification , Molecular Epidemiology , Phylogeny , Survival Analysis , Travel , Zoonoses/pathology , Zoonoses/transmission
7.
PLoS One ; 8(7): e69127, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23844250

ABSTRACT

In 2012 a novel coronavirus, MERS-CoV, associated with severe respiratory disease emerged in the Arabian Peninsula. To date, 55 human cases have been reported, including 31 fatal cases. Several of the cases were likely a result of human-to-human transmission. The emergence of this novel coronavirus prompts the need for a small animal model to study the pathogenesis of this virus and to test the efficacy of potential intervention strategies. In this study we explored the use of Syrian hamsters as a small animal disease model, using intratracheal inoculation and inoculation via aerosol. Clinical signs of disease, virus replication, histological lesions, cytokine upregulation nor seroconversion were observed in any of the inoculated animals, indicating that MERS-CoV does not replicate in Syrian hamsters.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/virology , Coronavirus/physiology , Mesocricetus/virology , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology , Virus Replication/physiology , Animals , Body Temperature/physiology , Body Weight/physiology , Cricetinae , Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4/metabolism , Disease Models, Animal , Host-Pathogen Interactions , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Mesocricetus/metabolism , Middle East , Syndrome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...