Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Rev Med Brux ; 11(1-2): 16-20, 1990.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2406832

ABSTRACT

In cervical dysplasia and neoplasia, recent studies have reported the unreliability of the pap smear. We have used a new screening technique, cervicography and have compared it to cervix cytology. We have performed biopsies under colposcopy as reference and quality control. On a series of 65 selected patients with pap smear screening program which were sent to the colposcopic triage, the cervicography is more sensitive (83%) than the pap smear (sensitivity: 42%). However, those two tests are from a specificity point of view, comparable (cervicography: 95% versus pap smear: 98%). The association of these two techniques has detected all the lesions: they seem to be complementary. In the Bordet Institute we decided to systematically perform both pap smear and cervicography for cervix screening.


Subject(s)
Mass Screening , Photography/methods , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Papanicolaou Test , Sensitivity and Specificity , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/prevention & control , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Vaginal Smears
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...