Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Crit Care Med ; 51(8): 1023-1032, 2023 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36971440

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Studies have suggested intrapulmonary shunts may contribute to hypoxemia in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with worse associated outcomes. We evaluated the presence of right-to-left (R-L) shunts in COVID-19 and non-COVID ARDS patients using a comprehensive hypoxemia workup for shunt etiology and associations with mortality. DESIGN: Prospective, observational cohort study. SETTING: Four tertiary hospitals in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. PATIENTS: Adult critically ill, mechanically ventilated, ICU patients admitted with COVID-19 or non-COVID (November 16, 2020, to September 1, 2021). INTERVENTIONS: Agitated-saline bubble studies with transthoracic echocardiography/transcranial Doppler ± transesophageal echocardiography assessed for R-L shunts presence. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Primary outcomes were shunt frequency and association with hospital mortality. Logistic regression analysis was used for adjustment. The study enrolled 226 patients (182 COVID-19 vs 42 non-COVID). Median age was 58 years (interquartile range [IQR], 47-67 yr) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores of 30 (IQR, 21-36). In COVID-19 patients, the frequency of R-L shunt was 31 of 182 COVID patients (17.0%) versus 10 of 44 non-COVID patients (22.7%), with no difference detected in shunt rates (risk difference [RD], -5.7%; 95% CI, -18.4 to 7.0; p = 0.38). In the COVID-19 group, hospital mortality was higher for those with R-L shunt compared with those without (54.8% vs 35.8%; RD, 19.0%; 95% CI, 0.1-37.9; p = 0.05). This did not persist at 90-day mortality nor after adjustment with regression. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence of increased R-L shunt rates in COVID-19 compared with non-COVID controls. R-L shunt was associated with increased in-hospital mortality for COVID-19 patients, but this did not persist at 90-day mortality or after adjusting using logistic regression.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Echocardiography , Hypoxia , Intensive Care Units , Alberta
2.
Crit Care Explor ; 4(11): e0789, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36382336

ABSTRACT

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening respiratory injury with multiple physiological sequelae. Shunting of deoxygenated blood through intra- and extrapulmonary shunts may complicate ARDS management. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to determine the prevalence of sonographically detected shunts, and their association with oxygenation and mortality in patients with ARDS. DATA SOURCES: Medical literature analysis and retrieval system online, Excerpta Medica dataBASE, Cochrane Library, and database of abstracts of reviews of effects databases on March 26, 2021. STUDY SELECTION: Articles relating to respiratory failure and sonographic shunt detection. DATA EXTRACTION: Articles were independently screened and extracted in duplicate. Data pertaining to study demographics and shunt detection were compiled for mortality and oxygenation outcomes. Risk of bias was appraised using the Joanna-Briggs Institute and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale tools with evidence rating certainty using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. DATA SYNTHESIS: From 4,617 citations, 10 observational studies met eligibility criteria. Sonographic detection of right-to-left shunt was present in 21.8% of patients (range, 14.4-30.0%) among included studies using transthoracic, transesophageal, and transcranial bubble Doppler ultrasonographies. Shunt prevalence may be associated with increased mortality (risk ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.01-1.49; p = 0.04, very low certainty evidence) with no difference in oxygenation as measured by Pao2:Fio2 ratio (mean difference, -0.7; 95% CI, -18.6 to 17.2; p = 0.94, very low certainty). CONCLUSIONS: Intra- and extrapulmonary shunts are detected frequently in ARDS with ultrasound techniques. Shunts may increase mortality among patients with ARDS, but its association with oxygenation is uncertain.

3.
BMJ Open ; 11(1): e042008, 2021 01 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33402406

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: In December 2019, the first cases of COVID-19 associated with SARS-CoV-2 viral infection were described in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. Since then, it has spread rapidly affecting 188 countries and was declared a pandemic by the WHO on 11 March 2020. Preliminary reports suggest up to 30% of patients require intensive care unit (ICU) admission and case fatality rate estimate is 2.3%-7.2%. The primary reason for ICU admission is hypoxaemic respiratory failure, while factors associated with ICU admission include increased age, presence of comorbidities and cytokine storm. Case series and retrospective trials initially assessed proposed treatments with randomised controlled trials now reporting early outcomes. We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify epidemiological factors, treatments and complications that predict mortality among critically ill patients with COVID-19. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Our comprehensive search strategy was developed in consultation with a research librarian. We will search electronic databases: Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Ovid Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and Wiley Cochrane Library. The search strategy combines concepts from COVID-19, validated COVID-19 search filters and geographical locations of large outbreaks. Citation screening, selection, quality assessment and data abstraction will be performed in duplicate. Clinically homogenous epidemiological characteristics, interventions and complications will be pooled in statistical meta-analysis. Within the framework of a living systematic review, the search and data analysis will be updated every 6 months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Our systematic review will synthesise literature on risk factors and interventions associated with mortality in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Results will be presented at national and international conferences and submitted for peer-reviewed publication. The pooled analysis can provide guidance to inform clinical guidelines for care of critically ill patients with COVID-19. Iterative updates will be made public through open access. Research ethics approval is not required. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020176672.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Critical Illness , Intensive Care Units , Pandemics , Humans , Comorbidity , COVID-19/epidemiology , Critical Illness/epidemiology , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2 , Systematic Reviews as Topic
4.
Resuscitation ; 155: 103-111, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32707142

ABSTRACT

AIM: To identify and summarize the available science on prone resuscitation. To determine the value of undertaking a systematic review on this topic; and to identify knowledge gaps to aid future research, education and guidelines. METHODS: This review was guided by specific methodological framework and reporting items (PRISMA-ScR). We included studies, cases and grey literature regarding prone position and CPR/cardiac arrest. The databases searched were MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus and Google Scholar. Expanded grey literature searching included internet search engine, targeted websites and social media. RESULTS: Of 453 identified studies, 24 (5%) studies met our inclusion criteria. There were four prone resuscitation-relevant studies examining: blood and tidal volumes generated by prone compressions; prone compression quality metrics on a manikin; and chest computed tomography scans for compression landmarking. Twenty case reports/series described the resuscitation of 25 prone patients. Prone compression quality was assessed by invasive blood pressure monitoring, exhaled carbon dioxide and pulse palpation. Recommended compression location was zero-to-two vertebral segments below the scapulae. Twenty of 25 cases (80%) survived prone resuscitation, although few cases reported long term outcome (neurological status at hospital discharge). Seven cases described full neurological recovery. CONCLUSION: This scoping review did not identify sufficient evidence to justify a systematic review or modified resuscitation guidelines. It remains reasonable to initiate resuscitation in the prone position if turning the patient supine would lead to delays or risk to providers or patients. Prone resuscitation quality can be judged using end-tidal CO2, and arterial pressure tracing, with patients turned supine if insufficient.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/methods , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Heart Arrest/therapy , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Patient Positioning/methods , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Adult , Aged , COVID-19 , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/mortality , Cause of Death , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Female , Global Health , Gray Literature , Heart Arrest/etiology , Heart Arrest/mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Prone Position , Risk Assessment , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
5.
JBJS Rev ; 7(2): e1, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30724762

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Evidence with regard to antibiotic prophylaxis for patients with open fractures of the extremities is limited. We therefore conducted a systematic survey addressing current practice and recommendations. METHODS: We included publications from January 2007 to June 2017. We searched Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for clinical studies and surveys of surgeons; WorldCat for textbooks; and web sites for guidelines and institutional protocols. RESULTS: We identified 223 eligible publications that reported 100 clinical practice patterns and 276 recommendations with regard to systemic antibiotic administration, and 3 recommendations regarding local antibiotic administration alone. Most publications of clinical practice patterns used regimens with both gram-positive and gram-negative coverage and continued the administration for 2 to 3 days. Most publications recommended prophylactic systemic antibiotics. Most recommendations suggested gram-positive coverage for less severe injuries and administration duration of 3 days or less. For more severe injuries, most recommendations suggested broad antimicrobial coverage continued for 2 to 3 days. Most publications reported intravenous administration of antibiotics immediately. CONCLUSIONS: Current practice and recommendations strongly support early systemic antibiotic prophylaxis for patients with open fractures of the extremities. Differences in antibiotic regimens, doses, and durations of administration remain in both practice and recommendations. Consensus with regard to optimal practice will likely require well-designed randomized controlled trials. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The current survey of literature systematically provides surgeons' practice and the available expert recommendations from 2007 to 2017 on the use of prophylactic antibiotics in the management of open fractures of extremities.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Fractures, Open/drug therapy , Fractures, Open/microbiology , Administration, Intravenous , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Fractures, Open/classification , Fractures, Open/surgery , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Publications/statistics & numerical data , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 27(6): 898-904, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27134109

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To report a single operator's experience using a modified single-puncture gastrostomy technique deploying up to three nonabsorbable gastropexy anchors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 69 consecutive patients undergoing gastrostomy, gastrojejunostomy, or jejunostomy tube insertion between March 2012 and January 2014 was performed. Technical success and 30-day local, major, and minor complication rates were assessed according to the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) Standards of Practice for Gastrointestinal Access. Procedure time was also recorded. RESULTS: Primary technical success of the procedure was 98.6% (68/69). In one patient, the procedure was aborted because the stomach could not be safely accessed. Major complications occurred in one of 69 (1.4%) patients, minor complications occurred in 10 of 69 (13%) patients, and local complications occurred in three of 69 (4.3%) patients. Local complications consisted of redness and mild tenderness at the enteric access site. Mean procedure time was 5 minutes (range, 3.1-36 min). CONCLUSIONS: Single-puncture, multianchor gastrostomy is a feasible technique for radiologically guided enteric access tube insertion with technical success and complication rates similar to conventional gastrostomy techniques. This technique could be considered when expeditious performance of a procedure is required.


Subject(s)
Enteral Nutrition/instrumentation , Gastropexy/instrumentation , Gastrostomy/instrumentation , Jejunostomy/instrumentation , Suture Techniques/instrumentation , Enteral Nutrition/adverse effects , Enteral Nutrition/methods , Feasibility Studies , Gastropexy/adverse effects , Gastrostomy/adverse effects , Humans , Jejunostomy/adverse effects , Punctures , Radiography, Interventional , Retrospective Studies , Suture Techniques/adverse effects , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
7.
Semin Intervent Radiol ; 32(1): 26-33, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25762845

ABSTRACT

Major bleeding remains an uncommon yet potentially devastating complication following percutaneous image-guided biopsy. This article reviews two cases of major bleeding after percutaneous biopsy and discusses the frequency, predictors, and periprocedural management of major postprocedural bleeding.

8.
Semin Intervent Radiol ; 32(1): 34-41, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25762846

ABSTRACT

Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are commonly used in select high-risk patients for the prevention of pulmonary embolism. Potentially serious complications can arise from the use of IVC filters, including thrombosis of the filter itself and filter fragment embolization. This article discusses the utility of IVC filters and reviews the management of two cases of filter-related complications.

9.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 25(11): 1671-81.e1, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25442131

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the potential risk factors for pneumothorax secondary to pulmonary radiofrequency (RF) ablation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six electronic databases were searched from inception to February 2014 for studies assessing potential patient-related, tumor-related, or treatment-related risk factors for pneumothorax during pulmonary RF ablation. Study selection, data collection, and quality assessment were done by three independent reviewers. RESULTS: Among 771 studies identified in the search, 10 retrospective cohort studies met inclusion criteria. There were 981 patients (61.5% male) with a mean age of 64.2 years included (259 primary lung tumors, 722 metastatic tumors). The prevalence of pneumothorax was 37% (95% confidence interval [CI], 29%-46%) in 1,916 RF ablation sessions. The potential patient-related and tumor-related risk factors for pneumothorax were increased age (mean difference [MD], 2.09; 95% CI [0.11-4.06]; I(2) = 0%), male gender (unadjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.20; 95% CI [1.49-3.27]; I(2) = 0%), no history of lung surgery (unadjusted OR, 0.29; 95% CI [0.19-0.44]; I(2) = 0%), and a greater number of tumors ablated (MD, 0.50; 95% CI [0.27-0.73]; I(2) = 0%). CONCLUSION: Based on available observational studies, the results suggest risk factors for pneumothorax secondary to pulmonary RF ablation may include increased age, male gender, no history of lung surgery, number of tumors ablated, and increased length of the aerated lung traversed by the electrode. The findings from this systematic review should be interpreted with caution because of the inherent limitations of the retrospective observational design.


Subject(s)
Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Pneumothorax/etiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Catheter Ablation/methods , Humans , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...