Deep resolution of clinical, cellular and transcriptomic inflammatory markers of psoriasis over 52 weeks of interleukin-17A inhibition by secukinumab.

BACKGROUND: Secukinumab, an anti-interleukin (IL)-17A monoclonal antibody, induces histological and molecular resolution of psoriatic plaques by 12 weeks. However, the long-term effects of secukinumab on the molecular resolution of psoriatic inflammation remain unknown. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the molecular resolution of psoriasis following 52 weeks of secukinumab treatment. METHODS: This was a two-part phase II randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled 52-week study of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis receiving secukinumab 300 mg (NCT01537432). Psoriatic lesional and nonlesional skin biopsies were obtained at baseline and at weeks 12 and 52, and the composition of the residual disease genomic profile (RDGP; i.e. 'molecular scar') of biopsies from secukinumab responders analysed. RESULTS: After 52 weeks of treatment, 14 of 24 enrolled patients were considered to be clinical responders [≥ 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75)], 4 of 24 were considered to be nonresponders (< PASI 75) and 6 of 24 patients were lost to follow-up; both the histological and transcriptomic profiles of PASI 75 responders improved from week 12 to week 52. RDGP transcripts of histological responders only partially overlapped between weeks 12 and 52, despite a similar number of transcripts in each RDGP; specifically, four novel transcript subsets showed distinct expression dynamics between weeks 12 and 52 ('slow-resolving', 'recurring', 'persistent' and 'resolved'), with anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory genes (e.g. SOCS1, CD207 and IL37) notably restored at week 52. Shorter disease duration prior to secukinumab treatment coincided with greater transcript improvements at weeks 12 and 52. CONCLUSIONS: Secukinumab improves the histological and molecular phenotype of psoriatic lesional skin up to 52 weeks of treatment; these results suggest possible mechanisms that drive long-term control of psoriasis.

Investigation of plaque psoriasis relapse after secukinumab withdrawal in patients from two Phase 3 studies.

BACKGROUND: Secukinumab is effective against a range of psoriatic manifestations. Investigating psoriasis (PsO) relapse following secukinumab discontinuation could provide insights into long-term PsO remission. OBJECTIVE: To examine PsO relapse rates upon treatment discontinuation following one year of secukinumab treatment. METHODS: This study (NCT01544595) is an extension of the Phase 3 ERASURE/FIXTURE studies in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque PsO. After one year of secukinumab 300 mg or 150 mg treatment, Week 52 PASI75 responders were randomly assigned to receive placebo. Upon relapse, patients receiving placebo were switched to their previous secukinumab dose. The study primary outcome was non-relapse rate after secukinumab withdrawal. RESULTS: Following the last dose of secukinumab 300 mg, 21% and 10% of patients who switched to placebo did not relapse at one and two years after discontinuation, respectively. Patients who received secukinumab 150 mg for one year showed a lower proportion of non-relapse following treatment discontinuation (14% and 6%) at one and two years, respectively). Non-relapsing patients maintained low mean PASI (2.8) at one year drug-free versus baseline (20.9); 1.7 at two years drug-free versus baseline (19.2). Disease duration (P=0.017) and severity (P=0.022) were significantly associated with time-to-relapse in patients initially treated with secukinumab 300 mg; patients with shorter disease duration and lower baseline PASI remained relapse-free for longer. CONCLUSIONS: Following discontinuation of secukinumab, a proportion of patients stayed relapse-free. Further, patients with shorter disease duration remained relapse-free for longer, suggesting that earlier treatment with secukinumab may result in long-term clinical control of moderate-to-severe PsO.

The Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD): The development and reliability testing of a novel clinical outcome measurement instrument for the severity of atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: An Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) is recommended by health agencies for drug registration in atopic dermatitis (AD). Current IGA scales lack standardization. OBJECTIVES: To develop an IGA scale, training module, and clinical certification examination for use in AD trials; establish content validity; and assess reliability. METHODS: Expert dermatologists participated in the development of the validated IGA for AD (vIGA-ADTM). Reliability (interrater and intrarater) was assessed by 2 web-based surveys. Clinical certification for investigators consisted of a training module and examination. RESULTS: Expert consensus was achieved around a 5-point IGA scale including morphologic descriptions, and content validity was established. Survey 1 showed strong interrater reliability (Kendall's coefficient of concordance W [Kendall's W], 0.809; intraclass correlation [ICC], 0.817) and excellent agreement (weighted kappa, 0.857). Survey 2, completed 5 months after training of dermatologists, showed improvements in scale reliability (Kendall's W, 0.819; ICC, 0.852; weighted kappa, 0.889). In this study, 627 investigators completed vIGA-AD training and certification. LIMITATIONS: Ratings were assessed on photographs. CONCLUSION: A validated IGA scale and training module were developed with the intent of harmonizing assessment of disease severity in AD trials. Strong reliability and excellent agreement between assessments were observed.

Secukinumab is superior to ustekinumab in clearing skin of subjects with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis up to 1 year: Results from the CLEAR study.

BACKGROUND: Secukinumab demonstrated superior efficacy to ustekinumab at week 4 and week 16 of the CLEAR study, with comparable safety, in subjects with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of secukinumab and ustekinumab use over 52 weeks. METHODS: Analysis of 52-week data from CLEAR, a randomized, double-blind, phase 3b study. RESULTS: Among 676 randomized subjects, secukinumab demonstrated superiority to ustekinumab at week 52 in the proportion of subjects with ≥90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) (76% vs 61% [P < .0001]); PASI 100 responses were 46% versus 36% (P = .0103) and Investigator's Global Assessment responses of clear/almost clear skin were 80% versus 65% (P < .0001). Subjects on secukinumab reported greater reductions in psoriasis-related pain, itching, and scaling, and greater improvement across all quality-of-life measures evaluated (Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI], EuroQoL 5-Dimension Health Questionnaire, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire-Psoriasis, and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index). At week 52, 72% of subjects on secukinumab versus 59% on ustekinumab (P = .0008) reported no impact of skin disease on their lives (DLQI 0/1 response). Safety and tolerability was comparable. LIMITATIONS: There was no placebo arm. CONCLUSION: In this head-to-head, double-blind study, secukinumab demonstrated sustained superior efficacy in comparison with ustekinumab in clearing skin through week 52, greater improvement in quality of life, and a favorable and comparable safety profile.

Secukinumab shows significant efficacy in palmoplantar psoriasis: Results from GESTURE, a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Plaque psoriasis affecting palms and soles is disabling and often resistant to treatment. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the efficacy and safety of secukinumab, an anti-interleukin 17A antibody, in subjects with palmoplantar psoriasis. METHODS: In this double-blinded, randomized controlled trial, 205 subjects were randomized 1:1:1 to secukinumab 300 mg, 150 mg, or placebo. The primary endpoint was Palmoplantar Investigator's Global Assessment (ppIGA) 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear/minimal) response at week 16. RESULTS: At week 16, the percentage of subjects who achieved clear or almost clear palms and soles (or ppIGA 0/1) with secukinumab 300 mg (33.3%) and 150 mg (22.1%) was superior to the percentage achieved with placebo (1.5%, P < .001). Palmoplantar Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (ppPASI) was significantly reduced with secukinumab 300 mg (-54.5%) and 150 mg (-35.3%) compared with placebo (-4.0%, P < .001). Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) 0/1 responses from subjects in the secukinumab groups were also significantly higher compared with placebo at week 16 (P < .01) and pain and function of palms and soles was markedly improved with secukinumab as measured by the palmoplantar Quality-of-Life Instrument. Secukinumab 300 mg consistently showed the best outcomes. The safety profile was favorable and similar to previous studies. LIMITATIONS: Lack of active comparator. CONCLUSION: In GESTURE, the largest randomized controlled trial in palmoplantar psoriasis, secukinumab demonstrated the greatest efficacy to date for treating difficult-to-treat psoriasis.

Secukinumab is superior to ustekinumab in clearing skin of subjects with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: CLEAR, a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Secukinumab, a fully human anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody, has shown superior efficacy to etanercept with similar safety in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (FIXTURE study). OBJECTIVE: We sought to directly compare efficacy and safety of secukinumab versus ustekinumab. METHODS: In this 52-week, double-blind study (NCT02074982), 676 subjects were randomized 1:1 to subcutaneous injection of secukinumab 300 mg or ustekinumab per label. Primary end point was 90% or more improvement from baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score (PASI 90) at week 16. RESULTS: Secukinumab (79.0%) was superior to ustekinumab (57.6%) as assessed by PASI 90 response at week 16 (P < .0001). The 100% improvement from baseline PASI score at week 16 was also significantly greater with secukinumab (44.3%) than ustekinumab (28.4%) (P < .0001). The 75% or more improvement from baseline PASI score at week 4 was superior for secukinumab (50.0%) versus ustekinumab (20.6%) (P < .0001). Percentage of subjects with the Dermatology Life Quality Index score 0/1 (week 16) was significantly higher with secukinumab (71.9%) than ustekinumab (57.4%) (P < .0001). The safety profile of secukinumab was comparable with ustekinumab and consistent with pivotal phase III secukinumab studies. LIMITATIONS: The study was not placebo-controlled and of short-term duration. CONCLUSIONS: Secukinumab is superior to ustekinumab in clearing skin of subjects with moderate to severe psoriasis and improving health-related quality of life with a comparable safety profile over 16 weeks.