Outpatient insulin use in type 2 diabetes mellitus and acute respiratory distress syndrome outcomes: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is debatable. T2DM was suspected to reduce the risk and complications of ARDS. However, during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), T2DM predisposed patients to ARDS, especially those who were on insulin at home. AIM: To evaluate the impact of outpatient insulin use in T2DM patients on non-COVID-19 ARDS outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. Adult patients diagnosed with ARDS were stratified into insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (DM) (IDDM) and non-insulin-dependent DM (NIDDM) groups. After applying exclusion criteria and matching over 20 variables, we compared cohorts for mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), length of stay (LOS), hospitalization costs, and other clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Following 1:1 propensity score matching, the analysis included 274 patients in each group. Notably, no statistically significant differences emerged between the IDDM and NIDDM groups in terms of mortality rates (32.8% vs 31.0%, P = 0.520), median hospital LOS (10 d, P = 0.537), requirement for mechanical ventilation, incidence rates of sepsis, pneumonia or AKI, median total hospitalization costs, or patient disposition upon discharge. CONCLUSION: Compared to alternative anti-diabetic medications, outpatient insulin treatment does not appear to exert an independent influence on in-hospital morbidity or mortality in diabetic patients with non-COVID-19 ARDS.

Automatic Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (AICD) Implantation as Secondary Prevention of Cardiac Sarcoidosis-Associated Ventricular Tachycardia.

Background: Cardiac sarcoidosis can cause a wide range of symptoms, including shortness of breath, chest pain, oedema, and fatal arrhythmias such as ventricular tachycardia (VT). Because the symptoms can be nonspecific, diagnosing cardiac sarcoidosis can be challenging. Treatment options may include corticosteroids to reduce inflammation, immunosuppressive drugs to prevent further damage, medications to control symptoms, ablation procedures, and defibrillators to prevent cardiac arrest. Case: A 60-year-old woman who has sarcoidosis affecting multiple organs including cardiac sarcoidosis, non-ischemic cardiomyopathy with reduced ejection fraction, and hypertension, was admitted with tachycardia, shortness of breath, and a recently fired automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (AICD). Three months prior, the patient was admitted for a syncopal episode and diagnosed with cardiac sarcoidosis through cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET), which demonstrated active inflammation, and an AICD was implanted. During this admission, the patient had an episode of ventricular tachycardia and was treated with amiodarone and lidocaine. The patient received steroids, sacubitril/valsartan, and methotrexate. After 48 hours of observation, the patient was discharged without further events. Conclusion: Cardiac sarcoidosis is a rare but serious disease that can lead to life-threatening cardiac complications such as ventricular tachycardia. Early diagnosis and aggressive management are crucial for improving outcomes and preventing sudden cardiac death. AICD implantation as a secondary prevention in cardiac sarcoidosis might prevent cardiac arrest." LEARNING POINTS: Cardiac sarcoidosis can present with non-specific symptoms and lead to life-threatening arrhythmias such as ventricular tachycardia, emphasising the importance of early diagnosis and aggressive management to prevent sudden cardiac death.A multidisciplinary approach involving imaging modalities such as cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) scans, along with histological findings, is crucial for accurately diagnosing cardiac sarcoidosis, as endomyocardial biopsy alone has low sensitivity.Implantation of an automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (AICD) as a secondary prevention measure should be considered in cardiac sarcoidosis patients, even in elderly individuals with mildly to moderately reduced ejection fraction, to prevent fatal arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death.

Ketamine Induced Acute Systolic Heart Failure.

Background: Studies have shown major cardiovascular effects associated with ketamine use disorder including dose-dependent negative inotropic effects. Preoperative ketamine use has been linked to ketamine-induced stress cardiomyopathy. Case presentation: A 28-year-old female with a history of recurrent cystitis and ketamine use disorder (twice weekly for 14 years) presented with bilateral lower extremity oedema and shortness of breath for 3 months. She was tachycardic with a troponin level of 0.07 ng/ml and a B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) level of 2511 pg/ml. Electrocardiogram showed normal sinus rhythm and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) showed left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) of 15%, dilated left ventricle, and severe tricuspid and mitral regurgitation. Computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest and abdomen showed bilateral pleural effusions with congestive hepatopathy and ascites. The patient was started on intravenous furosemide, metoprolol, and sacubitril/valsartan. Rheumatological workup including complement levels, and antinuclear anti-double-stranded DNA was negative. A repeat TTE 2 weeks later revealed an EF of 25% and moderate tricuspid regurgitation. Four months later, the EF was 54% with normal left ventricular cavity size. Conclusion: Although ketamine use disorder is increasing, data on long-term side effects is minimal. Screening for ketamine use disorders should be considered in patients presenting with acute systolic heart failure. Long-term studies are needed to evaluate the benefits of adding ketamine screening to standard urine toxicology. LEARNING POINTS: Ketamine use disorder can lead to severe cardiovascular complications, including acute systolic heart failure, likely due to its direct negative inotropic effects and dose-dependent impact on cardiac function.Clinicians should consider screening for ketamine use disorder in young adults presenting with acute systolic heart failure, especially when other common aetiologies have been ruled out.Early recognition and prompt treatment of ketamine-induced heart failure with diuretics and guideline-directed medical therapy can lead to significant improvement in cardiac function, but long-term management should also focus on ensuring cessation of ketamine use disorder.

Epidemiology of pathogens causing acute diarrhea in patients presenting to the emergency departments in 4 hospitals in Lebanon.

Acute diarrhea is a prevalent disease worldwide and a cause of mortality in low and middle-income countries. In previous studies, the causative enteropathogen is found in 38% to 58% of patients, leaving a considerable diagnostic gap. In this study, we intend to determine the pathogenic agents responsible for acute diarrhea in patients presenting to the Emergency Departments of several Lebanese hospitals. A total of 100 stool samples were collected between June 2022 and June 2023 from patients presenting with acute diarrhea to the Emergency Departments. Pathogens were detected by multiplex polymerase chain reaction. The average age for the patients was 53 years old. All patients presented with diarrhea, 15 of them had fever associated. In total, 46 patients were admitted to the hospital (70%), among them 80% received Intravenous antibiotics. Campylobacter was the most common agent detected in 36%, followed by Rotavirus 19%, and Noroviruses 15%. The rest was detected at lower percentages. Bacteria accounted for 49% of cases, viruses for 39%, and parasitic infection 6%. Acute diarrhea epidemiology is understudied in Lebanon. This study is the first Lebanese data about acute diarrhea pathogens. Avoiding overuse of antibiotics in bacterial versus viral infections can be achieved while prevention campaigns can raise awareness about food and water safety at the community level.

Lower odds of COVID-19-related mortality in hospitalised patients with type II diabetes mellitus: A single-centre study.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 infection in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) -a chronic illness in Lebanon-is not well described. METHODS: This was a single-centre retrospective observational study of 491 patients, including 152 patients with T2DM, who were hospitalised for COVID-19 between 20 August 2020 and 21 April 2021. Data on clinical characteristics, laboratory and radiological findings and outcomes were collected from the electronic medical records. Clinical characteristics and in-hospital mortality between patients with and without T2DM infected with COVID-19 using multivariate analysis were compared. RESULTS: Patients with T2DM were significantly older than those without T2DM (mean age, 68.7 vs. 60.3 years). Patients with T2DM were more likely to present with a body temperature of <38.3°C (83.9% vs. 69.9%) and less likely to present with chest pain (3.9% vs. 9.1%) and sore throat (2.0% vs. 6.8%). Patients with T2DM were more likely to be hypertensive (76.35% vs. 41%) and dyslipidaemic (58.6% vs. 25.7%) and had more frequent underlying coronary artery disease (33.6% vs. 12.4%). The rates of patients with creatinine levels of ≥1.17 mg/L and troponin T levels of ≥4 ng/dL were higher in the T2DM group than in the non-T2DM group (30.4% vs. 15% and 93.3% vs. 83.1%, respectively). Patients with T2DM were more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) (34.2% vs. 22.1%), require invasive ventilation (18.4% vs. 10.3%) and receive vasopressors (16.4% vs. 10.0%). Increasing age and the use of invasive ventilation and vasopressors were associated with higher odds of mortality (odds ratio (OR), 1.08, 9.95 and 19.83, respectively), whereas longer ICU stay was associated with lower odds of mortality (OR, 0.38). The odds of mortality were lower in the T2DM group than in the non-T2DM group (OR, 0.27). CONCLUSION: Among patients hospitalised for COVID-19, those with T2DM were older, presented with milder symptoms and had more comorbidities and higher troponin T levels compared with those without T2DM. Despite the worse clinical course, the patients with T2DM had lower odds of mortality than those without T2DM.

Evolution of COVID-19 infection characteristics in a Lebanese cohort of inpatients during different pandemic periods.

This study aims to describe COVID-19 patients characteristics, laboratory and imaging results, and the different outcomes of patients admitted to the Lebanese American University Medical Center-Rizk Hospital over a period of 9 months. In this observational retrospective study, data were obtained from electronic medical records of 491 male and female patients from the ages of 17 to 97. Analysis of the patients was performed in 3 periods: August 2020 to October 20 November 202020 to January 2021 and February 2021 to April 2021 corresponding with 3 waves of newly diagnosed cases during this period. The sample showed a male predominance with an average age of 63. The average hospitalization length was 10.1 days. The majority of patients were discharged to quarantine. The distribution of hospitalized cases was significantly correlated to the monthly distribution of newly COVID-19 cases in Lebanon. There was no significant difference in patient's characteristics between the 3 periods of the study (gender, age, body mass index, smoking, and medical conditions). Clinical presentations of the patients varied between the 3 periods. Similarly, the course and outcome of infection varied. Patients received less oxygen during period 1, while more patients were cured during period 3. This study presents the first Lebanese cohort of COVID-19 patients with their medical background, clinical presentation, laboratory results, radiological findings and course of infection with its outcome. It also shows how the relations between the medical manifestation of the COVID-19 pandemic and the socio-political measures of infection control are deeply intertwined.

Effect of combination of prophylactic or therapeutic anticoagulation with aspirin on the outcomes of hospitalized COVID-19 patients: An observational retrospective study.

Regimens for managing thromboembolic complications of COVID-19 are still not very well established. The present study compares the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 receiving different anticoagulation regimens with and without aspirin. This is a retrospective observational study of 491 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 from August 2020 to April 2021. Data regarding clinical characteristics, laboratory findings, and outcomes of patients receiving different anticoagulation with and without aspirin regimens was collected, according to which 5 patient groups were defined: received no anticoagulation (NAA), prophylactic anticoagulation with (PA) or without aspirin (PAA) and therapeutic anticoagulation with (TA) or without aspirin (TAA). The average age was highest in the TAA group. Desaturation was highest in the TA and TAA groups. Diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia and coronary artery disease were the most prevalent in aspirin groups (PAA and TAA) as was heart failure in the TA and TAA groups and cancer in the TA and PAA groups. Elevated troponin was observed in the PAA and TAA groups. TA and TAA patients received oxygen therapy, needed ICU admission overall, and required invasive ventilation and vasopressors the most. Prophylactic anticoagulation groups (PA and PAA) had the highest patient survival rates. Patients with severe COVID-19 infections were more likely to receive higher, therapeutic, anticoagulation doses. Aspirin was given to patients with preexisting comorbidities, but it had no statistically significant impact on the outcomes of the different groups. Groups receiving prophylactic anticoagulation had the best survival outcomes.

COVID-19 infection and seroconversion rates in healthcare workers in Lebanon: An observational study.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection is a recent pandemic. Healthcare workers (HCW) are at high risk of acquiring the infection and transmitting it to others. Seroprevalence for COVID-19 among HCW varies between countries, hospitals in the same country and even among different departments in the same hospital. In this study, we aim to determine the prevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antibodies and the seroconversion among the HCW in our hospital. A total of 203 HCW were included. The rate of conversion to seropositive was 19.7% in total, with a rate of 13.4% in female versus 25% in male. The seropositivity in the House keeping group was 83%, followed by 45% in the COVID Floor while the seropositivity in the Anesthesia was 4% and the Infection Control 0%. The highest seropositivity rate in the COVID floor, and in the intensive care unit was explained by the long time spent with the patients. While in the inhalation team and the anesthesia, the lower rates of seropositivity was due to the N95 mask wearing the whole time. Seropositivity for COVID-19 in HCW is a major public health concern. Policies should be implemented to better protect HCWs.

Intravenous high dose vitamin C and selected antiviral drugs in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a descriptive cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: There is lack of universal agreement on the management of COVID-19. Intravenous high dose vitamin C (HDVC), remdesivir (RDV), and favipiravir (FPV) have been suggested as part of the treatment regimens and only RDV is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) so far. There is no study in Lebanon that addresses the descriptive cohort of HDVC and antiviral therapy amongst COVID-19 inpatients. Our goal was to highlight such a cohort. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective electronic chart review of COVID-19 inpatients was done over a period of 10 months (August 2020 to April 2021). Comparative data analysis was performed between HDVC and non-HDVC (NHDVC) groups, and RDV and FPV groups. RESULTS: Among HDVC patients, 70.1% (p = 0.035) and 67.2% (p = 0.008) had dyspnea and desaturation respectively. Patients on HDVC were less likely to remain in hospital for more than 20 days (p = 0.003). HDVC patients were more likely to be on oxygen therapy with 74.7% (p = 0.002). RDV patients were more likely to be on other COVID-19-related medications during hospitalization including the use of tofacitinib, baricitinib, tocilizumab, and anticoagulation as recommended in the guidelines. Statistical significance was noted for the status on discharge as 90.1% of the patients that received RDV were discharged after clinical improvement, compared to the 74.2% of the FPV patients. CONCLUSIONS: Further research is needed to establish local guidelines for the treatment of COVID-19. A significant role of HDVC and FPV might resurface if randomized control trials are conducted.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antibody seroprevalence in Lebanon: a population-based cross-sectional study.

Objectives: The World Health Organization has promoted the use of serological testing as a rapid and accurate technique for the detection of immunity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). In Lebanon, a better understanding of the immune response against SARS-CoV-2 is needed to develop effective measures for prevention and to plan an appropriate national vaccination program. This study aimed to measure the immunity status in Lebanon. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the population comprised male and female Lebanese and non-Lebanese residents of Lebanon between the ages 15 and 75. The exclusion criteria included: same household, symptomatic individuals, and extremes of age (< 15 and > 75). Representative testing for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (anti-SARS-CoV-2 electrochemiluminescence immunoassay/ECLIA) was used to assess the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Lebanon. Results: In total, 13 755 participants were recruited over a 6-month period. Of these, 3168 (23.03%) individuals tested positive for anti-SARS-CoV-2, with levels of positivity varying among districts. A higher level of seropositivity was detected in the female participants. Conclusion: Seroprevalence against SARS-CoV-2 varied within Lebanon, but was comparable to the levels reported in the MENA region at the time of the study. The seroprevalence documented in this study represents a level of immunity that is not protective at the national level. Funding: This study was funded by the Lebanese American University School of Medicine.