Late withdrawal of cyclosporine in stable renal transplant recipients.

The use of cyclosporine (CsA) in renal transplantation has been associated with an improvement in 1-year graft survival, but has not changed the rate of late graft loss. We sought to determine whether the intent to withdraw CsA late after renal transplantation affects renal transplant survival and whether there is a racial difference in the effect of CsA withdrawal. This retrospective study included 384 consecutive patients receiving a renal transplant during the 1984 to 1991 period who were treated with CsA/azathioprine/prednisone and who had a functioning allograft 6 months following transplantation. Of these, 97 were electively withdrawn from CsA at a median of 22 months following transplantation. Factors significantly associated with the decision to withdraw CsA included white race, older age, and lower serum creatinine. Acute rejection within 6 months of stopping CsA occurred in 12 patients (12.4%), including nine of 78 (11.5%) white patients and three of 19 (15.8%) black patients. For the group of 287 patients who were not withdrawn from CsA, the 6-year graft survival rate was 59% (95% confidence interval, 52%, 66%). For the group of patients taken off of CsA, the 6-year graft survival rate was 84% (95% confidence interval, 76%, 92%). Cox proportional hazard survival analysis indicated that the intent to discontinue CsA was associated with better graft survival, with a hazard ratio of 0.37 (95% confidence interval, 0.20, 0.70), independent of other variables that may affect graft survival. A separate analysis controlling for waiting time bias also favored the CsA withdrawal group. There was no detectable racial difference in the effect of CsA withdrawal on graft survival.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Prospective trial of pulse oral versus intravenous calcitriol treatment of hyperparathyroidism in ESRD.

To examine the most effective route (intravenous vs. "pulse" oral), dose (physiologic vs. pharmacologic) and long-term efficacy of calcitriol therapy for secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), we randomized 19 hemodialysis patients with severe hyperparathyroidism to receive over a 36-week study period either pulse orally administered calcitriol and intravenous placebo (pulse oral group; N = 9) or intravenous calcitriol and oral placebo (intravenous group; N = 10). Calcitriol was given intermittently in a double-blinded fashion at an initial dose of 2 micrograms thrice weekly and increased as tolerated up to a maximum dose of 4 micrograms per treatment. All patients received similar daily calcium supplementation (2.5 g of elemental calcium) and low dialysate calcium (1.25 mmol/liter) throughout the study period. At the maximum tolerated calcitriol dose, serum 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels were significantly greater 60 minutes following intravenous (389 pmol/liter) compared to oral administration (128 pmol/liter). In spite of the different pharmacologic profiles, intravenous and oral administered calcitriol resulted in similar reductions of serum PTH over the 36 week period of observation (P = 0.300), achieving an overall maximum average PTH reduction of 43% (P = 0.016). Long-term intensive calcitriol therapy (independent of administration route), however, failed to decrease parathyroid gland size as assessed by high resolution ultrasound and/or magnetic resonance imaging. Calcitriol therapy also failed to alter the calcium sensitivity as assessed by serial PTH measurements in response to calcium loading. Increases in serum calcium, but not calcitriol dose or parathyroid gland size, predicted decrements in serum PTH, whereas hyperphosphatemia and the level of PTH suppression derived from the PTH/ionized calcium response curves predicted refractoriness to calcitriol therapy. Episodes of hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia were similar in both treatment groups and limited the dose of calcitriol that could be administered. These data indicate that intermittent intensive calcitriol therapy, regardless of administration route, is poorly tolerated, fails to correct parathyroid gland size and functional abnormalities, and has a limited ability to achieve sustained serum PTH reductions in end-stage renal failure patients with severe hyperparathyroidism.

Malpositioned peritoneal dialysis catheters: a critical reappraisal of correction by stiff-wire manipulation.

Tenckhoff peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter malposition is one of the leading causes of catheter malfunction. Fluoroscopically directed stiff-wire manipulation of malpositioned PD catheters has been advocated as a method of catheter salvage. Two hundred eighty-nine single-cuff PD catheters were placed surgically into 203 patients during this 4-year study. Thirty-three patients developed catheter malfunction attributed to malposition. Forty-eight stiff-wire manipulations were performed on these patients. Thirty-eight (78%) of the manipulations were described as successful at the time of transfer from radiology. However, only 25 (51%) and 12 (25%) resulted in functioning catheters at 1 week and 1 month, respectively. Only 11 of 33 patients who underwent manipulation had functional prolongation of catheter life beyond 1 month. The PD catheter was replaced by a column-disk PD catheter without additional catheter dysfunction in six patients. A second single-cuff Tenckhoff PD catheter was inserted in another six patients. Three of these six catheters again malpositioned. We conclude that stiff-wire manipulation is a useful and safe technique worth using on a limited basis for the initial episode of catheter malposition. Catheters that repetitively malposition should be replaced with a catheter that is resistant to malpositioning.