EGFR, pMAPK, pAkt and PTEN status by immunohistochemistry: correlation with clinical outcome in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab.

BACKGROUND: In an attempt to identify markers of resistance to trastuzumab, we evaluated both the profiling of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive tumor cells measuring the relative levels of EGFR, pMAPK, pAkt and PTEN and their correlations with clinical outcome in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Tumor tissues for this retrospective analysis were available from 45 out of 76 patients with metastatic breast cancer treated from April 1999 to March 2006 with trastuzumab-based therapy at our Institution. Evaluations of EGFR, pMAPK, pAkt and PTEN status by immunohistochemistry (IHC) were carried out on all 45 tissue samples and their correlations with response to trastuzumab, incidence of central nervous system (CNS) metastases, time to progression (TTP), overall survival from diagnosis of breast cancer (OS1), from diagnosis of metastatic disease (OS2) and from the start of trastuzumab (OS3) were analyzed. RESULTS: We observed that TTP (P = 0.001) and median OS2 and OS3 were significantly longer in patients responsive to trastuzumab-based regimen compared with nonresponsive patients. EGFR, pMAPK, pAkt and PTEN status by IHC were not significantly associated with response to trastuzumab, TTP, overall survival (OS1, OS2, OS3) and CNS metastases incidence. A trend for shorter OS3 was observed for pMAPK-positive patients compared with pMAPK-negative patients (22.8 versus 31.2 months; P = 0.076). Median OS1 resulted shorter in 22 pAkt-positive patients (69.8 months) compared with 23 pAkt-negative patients (108.2 months); P = 0.091. It is likely that high expression of pMAPK (pMAPK-positive status) or pAkt (pAkt-positive status) could identify a subgroup of HER2-positive tumors with high activity of proliferation and survival pathways and with resistance to trastuzumab. CONCLUSIONS: In HER2-positive metastatic breast cancers, EGFR, pMAPK, pAkt and PTEN status evaluated by IHC was not significantly associated with response to trastuzumab, TTP, OS and CNS metastases incidence. However, HER2 status determined by IHC and/or FISH assays may not be sufficient to predict response to trastuzumab-based therapy.

Aromatase inhibitors: a new reality for the adjuvant endocrine treatment of early-stage breast cancer in postmenopausal women.

Tamoxifen, a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), has been used for many decades as the "gold standard" adjuvant treatment for patients with hormone-receptor-positive early breast cancer. This drug, when administered for 5 years, reduces the risk for recurrence, contralateral breast cancer (BC) and death. The optimal duration of tamoxifen in the adjuvant setting has not been established yet, but it has been demonstrated that 5 years are better than shorter treatment while it is still unclear if a prolongation of the treatment for more than 5 years is worthwhile. In the last few years, third generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs), either steroidal (exemestane) or non-steroidal (anastrozole, letrozole), have shown to be an effective alternative to tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients with BC regardless of its stage. These agents act by blocking the aromatase enzyme which converts androgens into estrogens. The goal of this article was to review the results of recent randomized trials comparing AIs to tamoxifen in postmenopausal women in the adjuvant setting. Two strategies have been utilized: a direct upfront comparison in which both tamoxifen and AIs were given for 5 years or an early switch in which AIs were administered after 2-3 years of tamoxifen for 3-2 years or vice versa. Both strategies have shown a superiority of AIs over tamoxifen and a different safety profile but, the optimal treatment modality has yet to be defined. Moreover, in an attempt to further reduce patients' risk of recurrence after the administration of tamoxifen for 5 years, three trials have evaluated the role of prolonging the adjuvant treatment with AIs for 5 more years in comparison to placebo (late switch). A significant improvement of disease-free survival and of overall survival in the subgroup of node-positive patients, at least in one trial, has been observed with AIs. Despite these important results several unanswered questions remain and the results of ongoing trials will hopefully clarify some of them.