Characteristics and drug utilization patterns of new users of rosuvastatin and other statins in four countries.

AIM: This study was undertaken to increase understanding of the utilization of a newly introduced statin through evaluation of characteristics of 'real-life' patients in a pharmacoepidemiology program in the USA, the Netherlands, the UK and Canada. METHODS: This was an observational analysis of prospectively collected data from primary care patients classified as new users of rosuvastatin or any other statin. New users (naïve or switched initiators) of rosuvastatin were compared with initiators of other statins, as identified from automated healthcare databases in the first 1 to 2 years of rosuvastatin availability. Demographics, statin doses, previous statin use and other lipid-lowering therapies, and relevant comorbidities were recorded. The main outcome measure was proportion of naïve and non-naïve statin users in patients prescribed rosuvastatin or 'other statins'. RESULTS: Among 346.547 new statin users identified in the cohorts, 46.838 (13.5%) were new users of rosuvastatin and most (84.1%) were statin-naïve. Patients receiving rosuvastatin were more likely to have been previously treated with another statin or non-statin lipid-lowering therapy and tended to be younger, compared with first users of other statins. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that rosuvastatin is preferentially prescribed to patients who have not responded satisfactorily to established treatment.

Declining ovarian cancer rates in U.S. women in relation to parity and oral contraceptive use.

Ovarian cancer incidence and mortality rates have declined among U.S. women age 35-59 years during the period 1970-1995. Epidemiologic studies have shown that ovarian cancer risk decreases with increasing parity and increasing duration of oral contraceptive use. During this period, parity has declined while oral contraceptive use has increased. We compared temporal trends in observed ovarian cancer incidence rates with rates predicted by changes in parity and duration of oral contraceptive use to determine whether the changes in these characteristics could explain the declining rates in younger women. In addition, we wished to examine whether oral contraceptive use continues to be protective to postmenopausal women. To predict changes in rates between 1970 and 1995, we assumed that increases in parity and duration of oral contraceptive use induce proportional decreases in incidence rates. We found that the rates predicted by these assumptions agreed well with observed rates in young women (age 30-49) but were substantially lower than observed rates in older women (age 50-64). The data indicate that the relative decrease in incidence rates due to the protective effect of oral contraceptive use declines with age.