ABSTRACT
Objective:To construct the core competence evaluation index system of general practice residents by the Delphi method.Methods:After the literature review of home and abroad and group discussion, the core competence evaluation index system of general practice residents in the outpatient environment was preliminarily developed. On this basis, the index system was determined through two rounds of expert consultation. Excel 2015 and SPSS 26.0 were used for data entry and statistical analysis.Results:The active coefficients of the two rounds of expert consultation were 95.0% (19/20) and 100.0% (19/19) respectively, and the degree of authority of the two rounds of expert consultation was 0.86. An index system consisting of 6 first-level indicators and 28 second-level indicators was determined. The 6 first-level indicators were medical services/patient care, medical knowledge, professionalism, systems-based practice, practice-based learning and improvement, interpersonal communication, and communication skills.Conclusion:This study has constructed a complete and highly reliable core competence evaluation index system of general practice residents based on the outpatient environment, which can provide reference for the cultivation of the outpatient reception ability of general practice residents in the future.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To develop a monitoring tool for evaluating health literacy level of general practitioners.Methods:The health literacy monitoring questionnaire for general practitioners was preliminarily developed by referring to the National Residents′ Health Literacy Monitoring Questionnaire. The Delphi method was used to conduct two rounds of consultation among 15 experts to improve the questionnaire.Results:The effective response rates of the two rounds of expert consultation were 100.0%, the expert authority coefficients of the two rounds of consultation were 0.87 and 0.86, the mean scores of the two rounds of expert questions were 3.93 -5.00 and 4.47-5.00. The variance coefficients of the two rounds of expert scores were 0-0.32 and 0-0.20, and the Kendall harmony coefficients of the two rounds of expert scores were 0.167 and 0.102, respectively (all P<0.05). Finally, the basic theory literacy dimension (including 8 chronic disease prevention items, 5 maternal and child health items and 5 infectious disease prevention items), and the basic skill literacy dimension (including 6 safety and first aid items, 8 health information items), and the healthy lifestyle and behavior dimension (7 items, including regular physical examination, exercise, diet and so on) were established. A total of 39 items and 3 dimensions were used to monitor the health literacy level of general practitioners. Conclusion:The monitoring tool of health literacy level for general practitioners based on Delphi method has been preliminarily constructed, which can be used to evaluate the health literacy level of general practitioners.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To investigate the differences of clinicopathological features, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis between patients with extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors (EGIST) and duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (DGIST).@*Methods@#A retrospective case - control study was performed. Case inclusion criteria: (1) tumor confirmed by histology and pathology; (2) primary tumor locating in the extra - gastrointestinal tract or duodenum; (3) without other synchronous tumors; (4) complete clinical and pathological data. Clinical data of 20 EGIST patients and 32 DGIST patients from March 2011 to September 2016 at Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine were retrospectively collected and analyzed. The observational parameters included clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and prognosis conditions. Continuous data of abnormal distribution were expressed as median (range) and compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Survival curves were drawn by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the Log-rank test.@*Results@#Of the 20 EGIST patients, 8 were males and 12 were females with age of 61.0 (30.0 to 86.0) years and of the 32 DGIST patients, 12 were males and 20 were females with age of 55.5 (27.0 to 70.0) years. Compared with DGIST patients, EGIST patients were older (U=188.000, P=0.012], had larger tumor size [10.0 (3.0 to 29.0) cm vs. 4.0 (1.5 to 10.0) cm, U=98.500, P<0.001] and higher ratio of high risk classification [85.0% (17/20) vs. 12.5% (4/32), χ2=26.870, P<0.001]. Among the 20 EGIST patients, 5 were diagnosed with distal metastasis and received imatinib (400 mg/d), and the other 15 patients underwent radical resection who were included in survival analysis. All the 32 DGIST patients underwent radical resection. The median follow-up of whole group was 43 (14 to 76) months. The 3-year recurrence/metastasis-free survival rate of 15 cases undergoing radical resection in the EGIST group was 85.6%, which was lower than that of the DGIST group (88.6%), and the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.745). There was no significant difference in the 3-year overall survival rate between the EGIST group (92.9%) and the DGIST group (100%) (P=0.271).@*Conclusions@#As compared to DGIST, EGIST mostly occurs in those with older age, larger tumor size and higher risk grade. The prognosis of EGIST patients after radical resection is similar to that of DGIST patients.
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Clinical control trials about the efficacy and safety of surgery combined with HIPEC in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer published before June 2014 were searched in Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Wanfang database and CNKI database. Quality of enrolled articles was evaluated with the guidelines from Cochrane collaborative network. All the retrieved data were analyzed by RevMan 5.3 software for meta-analysis. Sensitivity analysis was performed by exclusion of non-randomly clinical control trials. Publication bias was evaluated by failure safe number (Nfs0.05).</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Of the 1489 AGC cases included from 16 literature, 698 underwent surgery with HIPEC (HIPEC group) while 791 underwent surgery alone (control group). According to whether or not the patient presented macroscopic peritoneal metastasis before the surgery, the HIPEC group was further divided into the curative HIPEC (n=102) and prophylactic HIPEC groups (n=421). The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with control group, the 1-year (OR=2.26, 95%CI:1.71 ~ 3.00, P=0.000), 3-year (OR=2.27, 95%CI:1.80 - 2.87, P=0.000) and 5-year (OR=1.58, 95%CI:1.20 - 2.07, P=0.001) survival rates of HIPEC group were significantly improved with significantly decreased overall recurrence rate of liver, lung, bone or peritoneal metastasis (OR=0.43, 95%CI:0.26 - 0.71, P=0.001) and lower peritoneal metastasis recurrence rate (OR=0.30, 95%CI:0.17 - 0.52, P=0.000). However, there was higher incidence of procedure-related morbidity in the HIPEC group (OR=1.67, 95%CI:1.13 - 2.45, P=0.009), whereby the incidences of myelotoxicity (OR=4.90, 95%CI:1.05 - 22.83, P=0.040) and renal insufficiency were higher (OR=3.59, 95%CI:1.67 - 7.74, P=0.001). While the other complications, such as anastomotic leakage, intestinal obstruction and respiratory diseases were not significantly different between the two groups(all P>0.05). Subgroup analysis showed that compared with control group, the rates of peritoneal recurrence and metastasis in the prophylactic HIPEC group were significantly lower (OR=0.34, 95%CI:0.24 - 0.48, P=0.000), while such rates were not significantly different in curative HIPEC group (OR=0.07, 95%CI:0.00 - 1.88, P=0.110).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Surgery combined with HIPEC can improve survival of AGC patients and reduce the recurrence rate after surgery. However its safety should be improved in the future.</p>
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To investigate the feasibility of delta-shaped (DS) gastroduodenostomy in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) for gastric cancer.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>From July 2013 to November 2013, 22 gastric cancer patients underwent DS gastroduodenostomy using laparoscopic linear stapler. All the patients underwent TLDG with D2 lymphadenectomy. In addition, modified DS anastomosis (when closing the common entry hole, previous duodenal staple line was also removed) was used in selected patients. Clinical data of these 22 patients were retrospectively analyzed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>All the patients underwent TLDG with D2 lymphadenectomy and DS gastroduodenostomy. Among them, 12 patients underwent modified DS anastomosis. The total operative time was (194.6±38.4) min, and the DS anastomosis time was (19.1±14.1) min. The number of linear stapler cartridges used per patient was 5.8±0.8. The intraoperative blood loss was (49.5±24.0) ml. The number of lymph nodes harvested per patient was 32.8±12.4. All the patients achieved microscopic cancer-free resection margin. The time to the first postoperative flatus, first water intake, and semi-liquid diet was (2.9±0.7) d, (4.8±1.1) d, and (6.6±1.2) d, respectively. The duration of postoperative hospital stay was (10.1±2.3) d. The postoperative complication rate was 9.1% (2/22). No patients developed anastomosis-related complications including anastomotic leakage, stenosis, or bleeding.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Delta-shaped gastroduodenostomy is simple, easy, safe, and feasible. It will be an ideal choice for reconstruction after totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy, and has great value in clinical practice.</p>
