Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Mol Genet Genomic Med ; 12(1): e2324, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38037722

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To analyze the genotype distribution and frequency of hearing loss genes in newborn population and evaluate the clinical value of genetic screening policy in China. METHODS: Genetic screening for hearing loss was offered to 84,029 neonates between March 2019 and December 2021, of whom 77,647 newborns accepted the screening program with one-year follow-up. The genotyping of 15 hot spot variants in GJB2, GJB3, SLC26A4, and MT-RNR1 was performed on microarray platform. RESULTS: A total of 3.05% (2369/77,647) newborns carried at least one genetic hearing loss-associated variant, indicated for early preventive management. The carrier frequency of GJB2 gene was the highest, at 1.48% (1147/77,647), followed by SLC26A4 gene at 1.07% (831/77,647), and GJB3 gene at 0.23% (181/77,647). GJB2 c.235delC variant and SLC26A4 IVS7-2A>G variant were the most common allelic variants with allele frequency of 0.6304% (979/155,294) and 0.3992% (620/155,294), respectively. 10 children are identified as homozygous or compound heterozygous for pathogenic variants (4 in GJB2, 6 in SLC26A4), and 7 of these infants had passed the hearing screening. Following up of the genetically screened newborns revealed that genetic screening detected more hearing-impaired infants than hearing screening alone. Genetic screening helped identify the infants who had passed the initial hearing screening, and reduced time for diagnosis and intervention of hearing aid. In addition, we identified 234 newborns (0.30%, 234/77,647) susceptible to preventable aminoglycoside antibiotic ototoxicity undetectable by hearing screening. CONCLUSION: We performed the largest-scale neonatal carrier screening for hearing loss genes in Southeast China. Our results indicated that genetic screening is an important complementation to conventional hearing screening. Our practice and experience may facilitate the application and development of neonatal genetic screening policy in mainland China.


Subject(s)
Deafness , Hearing Loss , Infant , Child , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Follow-Up Studies , Connexins/genetics , Connexin 26/genetics , Mutation , Genetic Testing/methods , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/genetics , Deafness/genetics
2.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-827741

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE@#To retrospectively analyze non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) data from two centers.@*METHODS@#The NIPS results of 10 840 samples were analyzed, including 21/18/13 trisomies (T21/T18/T13), sex chromosome and other autosomal aneuploidies, and copy number variants (CNVs). The maternal age, gestational week, body mass index and concentration of free fetal DNA (cffDNA) were also analyzed.@*RESULTS@#The average gestational age of the 10 840 pregnant women was (32.34±5.04) year old, and the average gestational week for NIPS was (17.60±3.55) week. The overall false positive rate for T21/T18/T13 was 0.11%, sensitivity was 100%, specificity was 99.89%, and positive predictive value was 81.5%. The positive predictive values for sex chromosome and other autosomal aneuploidies and CNVs were 56.67%, 11.76% and 83.33%, respectively. The incidence of T21/T18 in the elder women (35 years or elder) was 2.12 times(P 0.05) that of young women. cffDNA was in proportion to gestational week (r = 0.207) and in inverse proportion to body mass index (r = -0.177). It has increased slowly before 15 weeks of gestation and thereafter at a rate of 0.5% per week after the 16th week.@*CONCLUSION@#The performance of NIPS in this study is by large close to the reported in the literature, and the results can provide a reference for further study.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...