Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Diabetes Obes Metab ; 17(6): 560-565, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25728612

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To evaluate the potential efficacy, safety and tolerability of aleglitazar as monotherapy or add-on therapy to metformin or to a sulphonylurea (either alone or in combination with metformin). METHODS: We conducted a pooled analysis of data from three randomized phase III clinical trials of aleglitazar in patients with type 2 diabetes (n = 591). The three studies focused on: (i) aleglitazar alone; (ii) aleglitazar and metformin; and (iii) aleglitazar and sulphonylurea with or without metformin. Patients were randomized to 26 weeks' treatment with aleglitazar 150 µg/day or placebo. The primary endpoint was change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) concentration from baseline to week 26. Secondary endpoints included changes in lipids, fasting plasma glucose and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) at week 26. RESULTS: Reductions in HbA1c concentration from baseline to week 26 were statistically significantly greater with aleglitazar than with placebo. Aleglitazar treatment was associated with more beneficial changes in lipid profiles and HOMA-IR values than was placebo. Aleglitazar was generally well tolerated, with no reports of congestive heart failure. The incidence of peripheral oedema was similar in both groups. Change in body weight was +1.37 kg with aleglitazar and -0.53 kg with placebo. Hypoglycaemia was more frequently reported with aleglitazar (7.8%) than with placebo (1.7%), a result probably driven by the type of background medication. CONCLUSIONS: Development of aleglitazar was halted because of a lack of cardiovascular efficacy and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-related side effects in patients with type 2 diabetes post-acute coronary syndrome; however, in the present studies, aleglitazar was well tolerated and effective in improving HbA1c, insulin resistance and lipid variables.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Metformin/therapeutic use , Oxazoles/therapeutic use , Sulfonylurea Compounds/therapeutic use , Thiophenes/therapeutic use , Blood Glucose/analysis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood , Drug Therapy, Combination , Fasting/blood , Female , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Humans , Hypoglycemia/chemically induced , Insulin Resistance/physiology , Lipids/blood , Male , Middle Aged
2.
Ann Anat ; 182(3): 249-58, 2000 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10836098

ABSTRACT

The Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) plays an important role in the regulation of in vitro growth of prostate cells inducing a strong mitogenic effect. Nevertheless in our previous study we observed that the treatment of human hypertrophic prostate cell line U285 with exogenous EGF produces a restricted effect on the cellular growth rate. This phenomenon could be due to the capacity of the cells to produce EGF. In this study we aimed to verify this hypothesis by evaluating the presence of mRNA of EGF and EGF receptor (EGF-R) and of their translation products in U285 cells, before and after the treatment with suramin and exogenous EGF. Moreover we studied the effects exerted by these substances on the proliferative rate of the cells U285 after different treatment protocols. The presence in the cells of mRNA for EGF and EGF-R and of their translation products was demonstrated by means of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and immunocytochemical methods respectively. The modification of growth rate induced by these drugs was studied by FRAME Cytotoxicity Test. The operative modalities adopted to carry out these growth assays tended to 1) focus the effects of suramin in relation to in vitro cellular growth phase; 2) verify the reversibility of its effects; 3) ascertain if it was possible to antagonize the action of suramin by adding exogenous EGF. The results obtained from the RT-PCR showed the presence, in the control cells and in the treated ones, of mRNA coding for EGF and EGF-R. The immunocytochemical analysis indicated that 20% of the control cells are EGF positive, and 83% are EGF-R positive, confirming the results obtained with RT-PCR. Moreover, these stainings showed that the treatment with EGF does not significantly modify the percentage of cells marked by the anti-EGF antibody, while treatments with suramin and suramin plus EGF double this percentage. None of the treatments modifies the percentage of EGF-R positive cells. The growth assays showed that the exposition to highest doses of suramin in the first 24 h of cultures causes a decrease (p < 0.05) of the cellular proliferation during the following 48 h and 72 h and that these effects are irreversible. Moreover, a contemporaneous exposition of the cells to EGF and suramin at seeding strengthens the cytotoxic action of the last drug. To sum up, the demonstration of the presence in the U285 cells of mRNA coding for EGF and EGF-R and of the corresponding proteins, confirms the hypothesis that these cells can produce EGF. Moreover, the cytotoxicity experiments allowed a focusing of the role of the endogenous EGF in the regulation of the U285 cells proliferation and confirmed the importance of biological events that take place in U285 cells during the first 24 h of culture.


Subject(s)
Cell Division/drug effects , Cell Survival/drug effects , Epidermal Growth Factor/genetics , Epidermal Growth Factor/pharmacology , ErbB Receptors/genetics , Prostate/metabolism , Suramin/toxicity , Analysis of Variance , Cell Line , Epidermal Growth Factor/analysis , ErbB Receptors/analysis , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Male , Prostatic Hyperplasia , Protein Biosynthesis , RNA, Messenger/analysis , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...