ABSTRACT
Modelling of particle exposure is a useful tool for preliminary exposure assessment in workplaces with low and high exposure concentrations. However, actual exposure measurements are needed to assess models reliability. Worker exposure was monitored during packing of an inorganic granulate fertilizer at industrial scale using small and big bags. Particle concentrations were modelled with one and two box models, where the emission source was estimated with the fertilizer's dustiness index. The exposure levels were used to calculate inhaled dose rates and test accuracy of the exposure modellings. The particle number concentrations were measured from worker area by using a mobility and optical particle sizer which were used to calculate surface area and mass concentrations. The concentrations in the worker area during pre-activity ranged 63,797-81,073â¯cm-3, 4.6â¯×â¯106 to 7.5â¯×â¯106⯵m2â¯cm-3, and 354 to 634⯵gâ¯m-3 (respirable mass fraction) and during packing 50,300 to 85,949â¯cm-3, 4.3â¯×â¯106 to 7.6â¯×â¯106⯵m2â¯cm-3, and 279 to 668⯵gâ¯m-3 (respirable mass fraction). Thus, the packing process did not significantly increase the exposure levels. Chemical exposure was also under control based on REACH standards. The particle surface area deposition rate in respiratory tract was up to 7.6â¯×â¯106⯵m2â¯min-1 during packing, with 52%-61% of deposition occurring in the alveolar region. Ratios of the modelled and measured concentrations were 0.98⯱â¯0.19 and 0.84⯱â¯0.12 for small and big bags, respectively, when using the one box model, and 0.88⯱â¯0.25 and 0.82⯱â¯0.12, when using the two box model. The modelling precision improved for both models when outdoor particle concentrations were included. This study shows that exposure concentrations in a low emission industrial scenario, e.g. during packing of a fertilizer, can be predicted with a reasonable accuracy by using the concept of dustiness and mass balance models.
