Effects of ramelteon 8 mg on objective sleep latency in adults with chronic insomnia on nights 1 and 2: pooled analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Ramelteon is an MT(1)/MT(2) melatonin receptor agonist indicated for the treatment of insomnia characterized by difficulty with sleep onset. In previous clinical studies, ramelteon reduced latency to persistent sleep (LPS) in subjects with chronic insomnia. The goal of the current analysis was to determine the average reduction in LPS and overall adverse event profile for subjects taking ramelteon 8 mg. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This pooled analysis examined four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials of ramelteon in subjects with chronic insomnia. The analysis included adults (age 18-83 years) with chronic insomnia who took ramelteon 8 mg or placebo. The primary endpoint of each trial was mean LPS, measured by polysomnography (PSG) on nights 1 and 2. Adverse events were collected for all subjects for the duration of each trial. RESULTS: Efficacy data were available for 566 subjects who took ramelteon 8 mg (mean age 46.7 years) and 556 subjects who took placebo (mean age 47.8 years). Mean LPS at baseline was 66.6 min for the placebo group and 66.9 min for the ramelteon group. At nights 1 and 2, mean LPS for the ramelteon 8 mg group (30.2 min) was significantly less than the mean LPS for the placebo group (43.3 min). The least squares mean difference from placebo was -13.1 min (p < 0.001). Headache (8.9% ramelteon 8 mg, 8.8% placebo) and somnolence (3.5% ramelteon 8 mg, 0.7% placebo) were the most common adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Ramelteon 8 mg, on average, reduced LPS by approximately 13 min more than placebo on nights 1 and 2 of treatment in adults with chronic insomnia. Ramelteon was well tolerated with a low incidence of adverse events. This mean reduction in LPS versus placebo is similar to what has been reported for other classes of insomnia medications. However, these results reflect nights 1 and 2 of treatment and may not be representative of longer treatments.

Ramelteon 8 mg/d versus placebo in patients with chronic insomnia: post hoc analysis of a 5-week trial using 50% or greater reduction in latency to persistent sleep as a measure of treatment effect.

BACKGROUND: Ramelteon is a selective MT1/MT2 melatonin receptor agonist approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for insomnia treatment. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this post hoc analysis was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of ramelteon 8 mg/d versus placebo in adults with chronic insomnia. METHODS: This study analyzed data from a previously published 5-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients aged 18 to 64 years with chronic insomnia were randomly assigned to receive ramelteon 8 or 16 mg/d or placebo QD for 5 weeks. Sleep parameters were evaluated using polysomnography at weeks 1, 3, 5, and 6 (placebo runout). In this post hoc analysis, patients who received ramelteon 8 mg (approved dose) or placebo in the original study were evaluated using a primary end point of a=50% reduction from baseline in latency to persistent sleep (LPS). RESULTS: A total of 270 adults (ramelteon 8 mg, 139 patients, mean age, 38.0 years; placebo, 131 patients, mean age, 39.7 years) met the criteria for inclusion in this analysis. One patient from the original study (ramelteon 8-mg/d group) was excluded from the post hoc analysis based on a lack of evaluable LPS data. Ramelteon was associated with significantly greater proportions of patients who achieved a > or = 50% reduction in LPS compared with placebo at weeks 1 (63.0% vs 39.7%; P < 0.001), 3 (63.0% vs 41.2%; P < 0.001), and 5 (65.9% vs 48.9%; P < 0.005). No rebound insomnia or withdrawal effects were observed. Headache (19.4% and 18.3%), fatigue (9.4% and 2.3%), and somnolence (7.9% and 1.5%) were the most common adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In this post hoc analysis of data from patients with chronic insomnia, a significantly greater percentage experienced a > or = 50% reduction in LPS with ramelteon 8 mg/d versus placebo. This improvement was evident at week 1 and was sustained through 5 weeks of treatment. Ramelteon 8 mg was well tolerated in this study, with no evidence of withdrawal or rebound insomnia.

Self-reported efficacy and tolerability of ramelteon 8 mg in older adults experiencing severe sleep-onset difficulty.

BACKGROUND: Ramelteon is a selective MT(1)/MT(2) melatonin receptor agonist indicated for the treatment of insomnia characterized by difficulty with sleep onset. OBJECTIVE: The current analysis was conducted to determine the effectiveness of ramelteon 8 mg in reducing the time to fall asleep in older adults with severe baseline sleep-onset difficulties. METHODS: Patients with severe sleep-onset difficulty (defined as subjective sleep latency [sSL] > or =60 minutes) who had received ramelteon 8 mg or placebo were selected from a previously published multicenter outpatient trial of 829 older adults (aged > or =65 years) with primary, chronic insomnia (according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [Fourth Edition, Text Revision] criteria). Patients received single-blind placebo for 7 days (baseline) before receiving double-blind ramelteon 8 mg or placebo nightly for 5 weeks (35 nights). A 7-day, single-blind, placebo washout period followed. The primary end point was mean sSL for nights 1 through 7 (week 1). The mean changes in sSL from baseline at weeks 3 and 5 were evaluated to assess sustained efficacy. Adverse events (AEs) were collected in this analysis for both the ramelteon 8-mg and placebo groups. RESULTS: A total of 157 patients from the rameltcon 8-mg group (mean age, 72.7 years; 87 women, 70 men) and 170 patients from the placebo group (mean age, 72.3 years; 111 women, 59 men) met the entry criteria for this post hoc analysis. Ramelteon 8 mg significantly reduced sSL at week 1 compared with placebo (change from baseline, -23.2 vs -7.5 minutes; P = 0.002). This statistically significant improvement was sustained at week 3 (-33.7 vs -19.8 minutes; P = 0.005) and week 5 (-37.4 vs -17.1 minutes; P < 0.001). The incidence of AEs was low. The most commonly reported treatment-emergent AEs were dizziness (ramclteon, 8.9%; placebo, 7.1%), dysgeusia (ramelteon, 7.0%; placebo, 2.9%), myalgia (ramelteon, 6.4%; placebo, 3.5%), and headache (ramelteon, 5.1%; placebo, 5.9%). CONCLUSIONS: In this subset analysis of older adults with severe baseline sleep-onset difficulties, ramelteon 8 mg significantly and persistently reduced subjective reports of time to sleep onset during 5 weeks of nightly treatment. Ramelteon appeared to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment for these older adults with primary, chronic insomnia.

Effect of divalproex sodium on behavioural and cognitive problems in elderly dementia.

BACKGROUND: Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) occur in up to 90% of individuals with dementia at some point in their illness. BPSD reduce patient quality of life, cause great distress to caregivers and are the most common reason for institutionalisation. In nursing homes, pharmacological measures (usually antipsychotics or benzodiazepines) are often required to control agitation and aggression in patients with dementia. However, no medications have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for this indication as yet. The antiepileptic agent divalproex sodium may have advantages in this setting because of lower rates of drug interactions and adverse effects in this patient population. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the impact of treatment with divalproex sodium on behavioural, mood and cognitive measures in a population of elderly nursing home residents with a history of behaviour problems associated with dementia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was a retrospective analysis of a long-term care database which allowed assessment of the impact of divalproex sodium therapy on behavioural, mood and cognitive measures in elderly nursing home residents with a history of dementia-related behaviour problems. Minimum Data Set items relating to problems of behaviour, cognition and mood were collected prior to and after divalproex sodium treatment over a 1-year period. Two-phase generalised linear regression, with fixed intersections at the time of divalproex sodium initiation, was used to estimate trends in each measure prior to and after divalproex sodium initiation. Monotherapy, combination therapy with benzodiazepines and antipsychotics, and dose comparisons of divalproex sodium were studied. RESULTS: In all three situations (i.e. as monotherapy, in combination with benzodiazepines and antipsychotics, and at both higher and lower doses), divalproex sodium therapy was shown to have multiple beneficial effects on various behavioural, mood and cognition indicators in elderly nursing home residents. In general, the data seemed to support more favourable results for the higher divalproex sodium dose group. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the use of divalproex sodium in elderly nursing home residents with a history of dementia and behaviour problems and warrant conduct of prospective, randomised trials of the drug in this setting.