ABSTRACT
From recent work the putative eutherian karyotype from 100 Mya has been derived. Here, we have applied a new in silico technique, electronic chromosome painting (E-painting), on a large data set of genes whose positions are known in human, chicken, zebrafish and pufferfish. E-painting identifies conserved syntenies in the data set, and it enables a stepwise reconstruction of the ancestral vertebrate protokaryotype comprising 11 protochromosomes. During karyotype evolution in land vertebrates interchromosomal rearrangements by translocation are relatively frequent, whereas the karyotypes of birds and fish are much more conserved. Although the human karyotype is one of the most conserved in eutherians, it can no longer be considered highly conserved from a vertebrate-wide perspective.
Subject(s)
Biological Evolution , Vertebrates/genetics , Animals , Chickens/genetics , Chromosome Painting/methods , Fishes/genetics , Humans , Karyotyping/methods , Phylogeny , Tetraodontiformes/genetics , Time Factors , Zebrafish/geneticsABSTRACT
A combination of inter- and intra-species genome comparisons is required to identify and classify the full spectrum of genetic changes, both subtle and gross, that have accompanied the evolutionary divergence of humans and other primates. In this study, gene order comparisons of 11,518 human and chimpanzee orthologous gene pairs were performed to detect regions of inverted gene order that are potentially indicative of small-scale rearrangements such as inversions. By these means, a total of 71 potential micro-rearrangements were detected, nine of which were considered to represent micro-inversions encompassing more than three genes. These putative inversions were then investigated by FISH and/or PCR analyses and the authenticity of five of the nine inversions, ranging in size from approximately 800 kb to approximately 4.4 Mb, was confirmed. These inversions mapped to 1p13.2-13.3, 7p22.1, 7p13-14.1, 18p11.21-11.22 and 19q13.12 and encompass 50, 14, 16, 7 and 16 known genes, respectively. Intriguingly, four of the confirmed inversions turned out to be polymorphic: three were polymorphic in the chimpanzee and one in humans. It is concluded that micro-inversions make a significant contribution to genomic variability in both humans and chimpanzees and inversion polymorphisms may be more frequent than previously realized.
Subject(s)
Gene Rearrangement , Genetic Variation , Genome/genetics , Genomics/methods , Animals , Chromosome Inversion , Chromosome Mapping , Gene Order , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Pan troglodytes , SyntenyABSTRACT
By comparing high-coverage and high-quality whole genome sequence assemblies it is now possible to reconstruct putative ancestral progenitor karyotypes, here called protokaryotypes. For this study we used the recently described electronic chromosome painting technique (E-painting) to reconstruct the karyotype of the 85 million-year-old (MYA) ferungulate ancestor. This model is primarily based on dog (Canis familiaris) and cattle (Bos taurus) genome data and is highly consistent with comparative gene mapping and chromosome painting data. The protokaryotype bears 23 autosomal chromosome pairs and the sex chromosomes and preserves most of the chromosomal associations described previously for the boreo-eutherian protokaryotype. The model indicates that five interchromosomal rearrangements occurred during the transition from the boreo-eutherian to the ferungulate ancestor. From there on 66 further interchromosomal rearrangements took place in the lineage leading to cattle and 61 further interchromosomal rearrangements in the lineage to dog.
