Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial comparing systemic family therapy (FT-S) added to treatment as usual (TAU) with TAU alone in adolescents with anorexia nervosa.

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials showed the efficacy of family therapy for anorexia nervosa during adolescence, but studies examining its long-term beneficial effect are still needed. This article presents the results of a 54-month post-randomization follow-up of a previously reported randomized controlled trial that compared two post-hospitalization outpatient treatment programs: Treatment As Usual alone versus Systemic Family Therapy added to Treatment As Usual. METHODS: A consecutive series of 60 female adolescents with anorexia nervosa (DSM-IV) were randomized (30 per group). During the first 18 months, in the Treatment As Usual group, subjects received a multidisciplinary treatment. In the other group, Systemic Family Therapy sessions targeting intra-familial dynamics were added to Treatment As Usual. At 54 months, the primary outcome was defined using the Morgan and Russell global Outcome Categories (Good or Intermediate versus Poor). Secondary outcomes were the Global Outcome Assessment Schedule score, body mass index, amenorrhea, number of hospitalizations, eating disorder symptoms, psychopathological features, and family functioning. Analyses were carried out using an Intention-To-Treat with the Last Observation Carried Forward procedure. Data of 59/60 subjects were available. RESULTS: At 54 months, significant effects in favor of adding Systemic Family Therapy to Treatment As Usual were shown for the Global Outcome Categories (60% of Good/Intermediate versus 31% in the control group, p = .026), mean body mass index (p = .048), resumption of menses (70.0% vs. 40% p = .020), and mental state score (p = .010). Family cohesion scores were lower in the Systemic Family Therapy group (p = .040). CONCLUSIONS: Adding Systemic Family Therapy focusing on intra-familial dynamics to a multidimensional outpatient treatment program appeared to lead to a better long-term outcome in young women who suffered from severe anorexia nervosa during adolescence.

Patients and Parents' Experience of Multi-Family Therapy for Anorexia Nervosa: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Family therapy is considered as the gold standard in treatment of adolescents with anorexia nervosa (AN). Among the different types of family therapy, multi-family therapy (MFT) is increasingly used for treating AN, and shows promising results. In this article, our focus relied on the patients' and their parents' perceptions of the effectiveness and the underlying mechanisms of the MFT. METHODS: The present pilot exploratory qualitative study included two focus groups conducted using a semi-structured approach: one with the adolescents (n = 3), and another with one or two of their parents (n = 4 mothers; n = 2 fathers). The subjects discussed were the changes observed in both AN symptoms and family interactions following therapy, and the mechanisms underlying these changes. We crossed the perspectives of the adolescents and of the parents on these two points. RESULTS: Qualitative analysis revealed that while both adolescents and parents had difficulties relating the changes they observed in the last year to MFT, they were able to say that the group cohesion had several positive effects and that their family dynamics had improved. In the light of analysis the adolescents perceived more improvements related eating disorders symptoms than their parents did, while parents were concerned about a negative effect of MFT on their children. DISCUSSION: While both patients and parents perceived improvements in both AN symptoms and family interactions in the past year, it was not clear if they considered MFT to have led to these improvements. FG also explored the MFT mechanisms underlying changes. Both adolescents and their parents stressed the beneficial effects of identification to others members of the group and shared experience to overcome social isolation. Parents also mentioned the sympathy they felt for each other. The idea that they give a central place to families in the therapy was also described by the families.

A Review of Psychopathology Features, Personality, and Coping in Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1.

BACKGROUND: The last literature review on psychopathological features in Myotonic Dystrophy type 1 had been conducted by Ambrosini and Nurnberg in 1979. Since that date, many researches had been carried out. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is (i) to systematically obtain and evaluate the relevant literature on psychopathological features, personality, and coping in individuals with adult phenotypes of Myotonic Dystrophy type 1. (ii) To summarize current research findings and draw conclusions for future research. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted on Pubmed, PubPsych, PsycInfo, Science Direct, and Scopus covering the period of January 1979 to July 2017. RESULTS: In view of our literature review, patients show mild psychopathological problems, such as interpersonal difficulties, lack of interest, dysphoria, concern about bodily functioning, and hypersensibility. However, they do not experience more psychiatric disorder in comparison to the general population, except for personality disorders and depression. We discussed problems concerning depression's assessment tool. Patients also present symptoms of several personality disorders: avoidant personality disorder was the most common. Finally, coping strategies relative to limitations resulting from their disease have a negative impact on their quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, Myotonic Dystrophy type 1 patients did not present homogeneous psychopathological and psychological features. However, based on tendencies observed among Myotonic Dystrophy type 1 patients, elements to conceptualize their social difficulties are provided.