Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
AEM Educ Train ; 5(3): e10557, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34124505

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia (UGRA) can be a powerful tool in the treatment of painful conditions commonly encountered in emergency medicine (EM) practice. UGRA can benefit patients while avoiding the risks of procedural sedation and opioid-based systemic analgesia. Despite these advantages, many EM trainees do not receive focused education in UGRA and there is no published curriculum specifically for EM physicians. The objective of this study was to identify the components of a UGRA curriculum for EM physicians. METHODS: A list of potential curriculum elements was developed through an extensive literature review. An expert panel was convened that included 13 ultrasound faculty members from 12 institutions and from a variety of practice environments and diverse geographical regions. The panel voted on curriculum elements through two rounds of a modified Delphi process. RESULTS: The panelists voted on 178 total elements, 110 background knowledge elements, and 68 individual UGRA techniques. A high level of agreement was achieved for 65 background knowledge elements from the categories: benefits to providers and patients, indications, contraindications, risks, ultrasound skills, procedural skills, sterile technique, local anesthetics, and educational resources. Ten UGRA techniques achieved consensus: interscalene brachial plexus, supraclavicular brachial plexus, radial nerve, median nerve, ulnar nerve, serratus anterior plane, fascia iliaca, femoral nerve, popliteal sciatic nerve, and posterior tibial nerve blocks. CONCLUSIONS: The defined curriculum represents ultrasound expert opinion on a curriculum for training practicing EM physicians. This curriculum can be used to guide the development and implementation of more robust UGRA education for both residents and independent providers.

2.
J Emerg Med ; 56(2): 197-200, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30389284

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Injuries from nail guns are a unique type of penetrating trauma seen in emergency departments (EDs), rising in prevalence in the United States. These devices can lead to life-threatening injuries that require rapid diagnosis to help guide management. CASE REPORT: An elderly man was brought to the ED having sustained a nail gun injury to the chest. After loss of pulses, brief closed chest compressions and rapid blood product administration led to a return of spontaneous circulation. Using bedside ultrasound, a metallic foreign body was identified tracking through the right ventricle with associated pericardial fluid and pericardial clot. This rapid diagnosis with bedside ultrasound helped facilitate timely transport to the operating room for median sternotomy, foreign body removal, and pledgeted cardiac repair. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: With continued developments in image quality and acquisition, and improvements of physician operator performance, ultrasonography has continued to make significant impacts in traumatically injured patients in new ways. We present this case report to highlight precordial nail gun injuries and to emphasize the diagnostic capabilities of bedside ultrasound for these patients.


Subject(s)
Heart Injuries/surgery , Heart/physiopathology , Point-of-Care Testing/standards , Ultrasonography/methods , Wounds, Penetrating/diagnosis , Aged , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Firearms/statistics & numerical data , Foreign Bodies/complications , Foreign Bodies/surgery , Heart/diagnostic imaging , Heart Injuries/etiology , Humans , Male , Point-of-Care Testing/trends , Respiratory Insufficiency/etiology , Respiratory Insufficiency/surgery , Thoracotomy/methods , Wounds, Penetrating/surgery
3.
Clin Cancer Res ; 21(21): 4801-10, 2015 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26169970

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This "3+3" phase I study evaluated the safety, biologic, and clinical activity of lenvatinib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, in patients with solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Ascending doses of lenvatinib were administered per os twice daily in 28-day cycles. Safety and response were assessed for all patients. Angiogenic and apoptotic factors were tested as possible biomarkers in an expanded melanoma cohort. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients were treated in 3 cohorts: 18 with intermittent twice-daily dosing (7 days on, 7 days off) of 0.1-3.2 mg; 33 with twice-daily dosing of 3.2-12 mg; and 26 with twice-daily dosing of 10 mg (expanded melanoma cohort). Maximum tolerated dose was established at 10 mg per os twice daily. Prominent drug-related toxicities included hypertension (43%), fatigue (42%), proteinuria (39%), and nausea (25%); dose-limiting toxicities included hypertension, fatigue, and proteinuria. Twelve patients (15.6%) achieved partial response (PR, n = 9) or unconfirmed PR (uPR, n = 3), and 19 (24.7%) achieved stable disease (SD) ≥23 weeks. Total PR/uPR/SD ≥23 weeks was 40.3% (n = 31). Responses (PR/uPR) by disease were as follows: melanoma, 5 of 29 patients (includes 1 patient with NRAS mutation); thyroid, 3 of 6 patients; pancreatic, 1 of 2 patients; lung, 1 of 1 patients; renal, 1 of 1 patients; endometrial, 1 of 4 patients; and ovarian, 1 of 5 patients. AUC(0-24) and C(max) increased dose proportionally. In multivariate Cox proportional hazard model analyses, increased baseline systolic blood pressure and decreased angiopoietin-1 ratio (2 hours:baseline) were associated with longer progression-free survival (PFS) in the expanded melanoma cohort (P = 0.041 and P = 0.03, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The toxicity profile, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of lenvatinib are encouraging. Decreases in the angiopoietin-1 ratio correlated with longer PFS in melanoma patients.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Melanoma/drug therapy , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/pathology , Phenylurea Compounds/administration & dosage , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Quinolines/administration & dosage , Administration, Oral , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/adverse effects , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Cohort Studies , DNA Mutational Analysis , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Maximum Tolerated Dose , Melanoma/genetics , Melanoma/mortality , Melanoma/pathology , Middle Aged , Mutation , Neoplasm Staging , Neoplasms/genetics , Neoplasms/mortality , Phenylurea Compounds/adverse effects , Phenylurea Compounds/pharmacokinetics , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Quinolines/adverse effects , Quinolines/pharmacokinetics , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Emerg Med ; 46(4): 519-24, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24462032

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guidance for internal jugular central venous cannulation (CVC) has become the recommended best practice and has been shown to improve placement success and reduce complications. There is a dearth of studies that evaluate emergency point-of-care ultrasound guidance of femoral CVC. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine if point-of-care ultrasound guidance for femoral CVC decreases adverse events and increases the likelihood of successful placement when compared with the landmark technique. METHODS: We conducted an Institutional Review Board-approved, prospective, observational study of consecutive patients who required CVC. Physicians who performed CVC completed a standardized, web-based data sheet for a national CVC registry. We evaluated single-institution data regarding CVC site, ultrasound usage, CVC indication, and mechanical complications (e.g., pneumothorax, arterial puncture, failed access, catheter misdirection, and hematoma). The study period was between January 2006 and June 2010. Analysis using Pearson's χ(2) and Agresti-Coull binomial confidence intervals was performed; significance was defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: We evaluated data for 143 patients who had femoral CVC in our institution. Sixty CVCs (42%) were performed under ultrasound guidance, 83 (58%) via landmark technique (p = 0.0159); 3.3% of femoral central venous lines placed by ultrasound guidance had recorded adverse events compared with 9.6% for the landmark technique (p = 0.145). There was no statistically significant difference in complications between ultrasound-guidance and landmark techniques. Our data showed a trend toward decreased rates of arterial puncture and reduced cannulation attempts resulting in improved placement success. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience shows that ultrasound guidance for femoral CVC might decrease complications and improve placement success, although we cannot recommend this approach without additional data. We recommend a larger study to further evaluate this technique.


Subject(s)
Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Catheterization, Central Venous/methods , Emergency Treatment , Femoral Vein , Ultrasonography, Interventional , Anatomic Landmarks , Humans , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Point-of-Care Systems , Prospective Studies , Ultrasonography, Interventional/instrumentation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...