Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Neth J Med ; 66(7): 292-306, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18663260

ABSTRACT

The development of this guideline was initiated and coordinated by the Netherlands Association of Gastroenterologists and Hepatologists (Nederlandse Vereniging van Maag-Darm-Leverartsen). The aim is the establishment of national standards in the evaluation and antiviral treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. This includes recommendations on the initial evaluation of patients, choice and duration of antiviral therapy, follow-up after antiviral therapy and monitoring of patients not currently requiring antiviral therapy. The initial evaluation of chronic HBV-infected patients should include testing of liver biochemistry, virus serology and abdominal imaging. In patients without cirrhosis, antiviral treatment is recommended for those with a serum HBV DNA of at least 1.0 x 105 c/ml (>or=2.0 x 10(4) IU/ml) in combination with: a) elevation of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) level above twice the upper limit of normal during at least three months, and/or b) histological evidence of porto-portal septa or interface hepatitis on liver histology. In patients with cirrhosis, antiviral treatment is recommended if serum HBV DNA is 1.0 x 10(4)c/ml (>or=2.0 x 10(3) IU/ml) or higher, independent of ALAT levels or histological findings. If the patient has decompensated cirrhosis, antiviral treatment is recommended if serum HBV DNA is 1000 c/ml (>or=200 IU/ml) or higher. Patients who do not have an indication for antiviral treatment should be monitored because there is a risk of (re)activation of disease activity. Monitoring every three to six months is recommended for HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients with high viraemia (HBV DNA >or=1.0 x 10(5) c/ml or >or=2.0 x 10(4) IU/ml) and normal ALAT levels. For patients with serum HBV DNA below 1.0 x 10(5) c/ml (<2.0 x 10(4) IU/ml) the recommended frequency of monitoring is every three to six months for HBeAg-positive patients and every six to 12 months for HBeAg-negative patients. Peginterferon (PEG-IF N) therapy should be considered as initial therapy in both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients without contraindications for treatment with this drug because of the higher chance of achieving sustained response compared with nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy. In patients starting nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy, the use of lamivudine is not preferred if long-term antiviral treatment is expected due to the high risk of antiviral resistance against this drug. Of the currently licensed nucleos(t)ide analogues, entecavir has the lowest risk of antiviral resistance (compared with lamivudine, adefovir and telbivudine), while suppression of viral replication seems most profound with either entecavir or telbivudine. The recommended duration of treatment with PEG-IF N is one year for both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients. In HBeAg-positive patents, nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy should at least be continued until HBeAg seroconversion and a decline in HBV DNA to below 400 c/ml (80 IU/ml) has been achieved and maintained for six months during therapy. Whether nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy can be safely discontinued in HBeAg-negative patients is unknown; usually prolonged or indefinite antiviral treatment is necessary. Patients receiving PEG-IF N should be monitored once a month, while three monthly monitoring suffices for those receiving nucleos(t)ide analogues. Genotypic analysis of the HBV polymerase is indicated if an increase in serum HBV DNA of at least 1 log(10) c/ml (IU/ml) compared with the nadir value is observed during nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy. Antiviral therapy should be changed as soon as possible in case of confirmed genotypic resistance. Adding a second antiviral agent seems beneficial over switching to another agent. With the availability of multiple new antiviral drugs for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B, effective treatment is now possible for more patients and for longer periods. However, the complexity of HBV therapy has also increased. Nowadays, virtually all chronic HBV-infected patients can be effectively managed, either by inducing sustained off-treatment response or by maintaining an on-treatment response.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Guidelines as Topic/standards , Hepatitis B, Chronic/drug therapy , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Humans , Netherlands
2.
J Hepatol ; 21(4): 592-600, 1994 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7814807

ABSTRACT

We investigated the role of the donor liver in the origin of platelet disorders and hemostatic defects in liver transplantation. Eighteen pigs received an orthotopic or a heterotopic, auxiliary liver graft. Liver biopsies were taken for electron microscopic studies 5-10 min after reperfusion in nine animals. Blood samples were taken from the first hepatic outflow and from the systemic circulation before and 5 min after graft recirculation. Electron microscopy did not show any evidence of microthrombi or platelet aggregation in the graft, either after orthotopic liver transplantation or after heterotopic liver transplantation. Most blood platelets, which were lying free in the sinusoids, showed cell processes and many seemed to have lost their granulae, suggesting a degree of platelet activation. There were also signs of phagocytosis of platelets by the Kupffer cells. In the hepatic outflow, platelet count was significantly lower (p < 0.05) and fibrinolytic activity significantly higher (p < 0.01), than systemic post-reperfusion values. There were no important changes in the coagulation parameters. No significant changes were found between the effects on hemostasis of orthotopic and auxiliary graft reperfusion. In the second part of the study evidence for platelet activation was found after graft reperfusion in human liver transplantation. Plasma levels of platelet factor-4 and beta-thromboglobulin increased significantly after graft reperfusion. These studies suggest that platelet disorders and increased fibrinolytic activity are the major components of the hemostatic defect after graft recirculation in liver transplantation. Sequestration of platelets in the graft is probably due to the accumulation of (activated and degranulated) platelets in the sinusoids and phagocytosis by Kupffer cells.


Subject(s)
Fibrinolysis , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Liver/pathology , Thrombocytopenia/etiology , Animals , Biopsy , Blood Platelets/pathology , Blood Platelets/physiology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Female , Humans , Kupffer Cells/physiology , Liver Transplantation/pathology , Microscopy, Electron , Phagocytosis , Platelet Activation , Platelet Factor 4/analysis , Swine , Transplantation, Heterotopic , beta-Thromboglobulin/analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...