Recommendations for Integrated Systems and Services for People With Co-occurring Mental Health and Substance Use Conditions.

People with co-occurring mental and substance use disorders experience poor outcomes and incur high costs in multiple domains. Efforts to develop and disseminate evidence-based integrated programs for people with such co-occurring disorders began to wane in the past decade as efforts shifted toward integrating primary health care. Several recent trends underscore the need to refocus efforts on providing integrated care for people with both mental and substance use disorders. The authors summarize what is known about integrated care for people with these co-occurring disorders and recommend advancing implementation and research on integration and improving outcomes with existing resources.

The Self-assessment for Modification of Anti-Racism Tool (SMART): Addressing Structural Racism in Community Behavioral Health.

A national dialogue on systemic racism has been reinvigorated by the highly publicized deaths of several unarmed Black Americans, including George Floyd and Breonna Taylor. In response, the AACP Board considered how to promote concrete, meaningful action to support its membership in measurably addressing structures and policies that promote racism. In this article, literature on existing frameworks aimed at addressing health inequity on the organizational level are reviewed. We introduce the Self-assessment for Modification of Anti-Racism Tool (SMART), a quality improvement tool that aims to meet the AACP's needs in facilitating organizational change in community behavioral healthcare. The AACP SMART's development, components, use, and future directions are described. The AACP SMART builds on prior organizational tools supporting equity work in healthcare, providing a quality improvement tool that incorporates domains specific to structural racism and disparities issues in community behavioral healthcare.

American Association of Community Psychiatrists Position Statement: Putting Patients First by Improving Treatment Planning and Reducing Administrative and Clinical Burden of Treatment Plan Documentation.

This paper represents a position statement of the American Association of Community Psychiatrists (AACP) regarding treatment plans. We regard treatment plans, a documentation requirement, in this position statement, as distinct from the process of treatment planning. The AACP is concerned that treatment plan documentation in its current state, creates unnecessary administrative burden for physicians, without evidence of benefit for patients, reducing direct patient contact time, thereby negatively impacting quality of care. In this position, we echo the statements made by the American College of Physicians in their position paper entitled "Putting Patients First by Reducing Administrative Tasks in Health Care". We recommend a review of the treatment plan documentation requirement across the nation, engaging consumers, providers, regulatory agencies in all states, as well as national reimbursement and regulatory agencies, in order to promote the process of quality driven care and documentation.

Changing the world: the design and implementation of comprehensive continuous integrated systems of care for individuals with co-occurring disorders.

This article has described the CCISC model and the process of implementation of systemic implementation of co-occurring disorder services enhancements within the context of existing resources. Four projects were described as illustrations of current implementation activities. Clearly, there is need for improved services for these individuals, and increasing recognition of the need for systemic change models that are effective and efficient. The CCISC model has been recognized by SAMHSA as a consensus best practice for system design, and initial efforts at implementation appear to be promising. The existing toolkit may permit a more formal process of data-driven evaluation of system, program, clinician, and client outcomes, to better measure the effectiveness of this approach. Some projects have begun such formal evaluation processes, but more work is needed, not only with individual projects, but also to develop opportunities for multi-system evaluation, as more projects come on line.

Development of service intensity criteria and program categories for individuals with co-occurring disorders.

Many patients present a clinical situation in which psychiatric symptomatology and substance related symptomatology are inextricably intertwined. A paradox exists for these patients, in that both the addictions and mental health systems of care, and the level of care assessment methodologies associated with each system, are designed for one type of disorder only, or only one disorder at a time. As a result, these individuals are perceived as "system misfits." Our inability to assess these patients accurately and place them appropriately contributes to poor outcomes and high costs. These costs consist of expensive utilization of scarce system resources. There is a growing need for a more integrated methodology for level of care assessment, in which both psychiatric and substance symptomatology can be assessed simultaneously to generate a wider array of programmatic interventions for individuals with co-occurring disorders. This article describes efforts to build upon the Patient Placement Criteria published by the American Society of Addiction Medicine, Second Edition (ASAM PPC-2) to develop a revised instrument that is much more capable of evaluating the placement needs of individuals who present with combinations of psychiatric and substance symptomatology.