Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Publication year range
1.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 27(8): 1668-1676, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37268828

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Malignant tumors, such as hilar cholangiocarcinoma, have shown improved long-term outcomes, and measures to prevent late postoperative complications are important. Postoperative cholangitis after hepatectomy with hepaticojejunostomy (HHJ) may occur and can significantly decrease the quality of life. However, there are few reports on the incidence and pathogenesis of postoperative cholangitis after HHJ. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 71 cases post HHJ at Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital from January 2010 to December 2021. Cholangitis was diagnosed using the Tokyo Guideline 2018. Cases due to tumor recurrence around the hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) were excluded. Patients with three or more episodes of cholangitis were classified as the "refractory cholangitis group" (RC group). RC group patients were divided into a "stenosis group" and "non-stenosis group" according to intrahepatic bile duct dilatation at the onset of cholangitis. Their clinical characteristics and risk factors were analyzed. RESULTS: Cholangitis occurred in 20 patients (28.1%), with 17 (23.9%) in the RC group. Most patients in the RC group developed their first episode within the first postoperative year. The stenosis group consisted of 6 patients, and their cholangitis was treated with repeated anastomotic dilatation and stent replacement. In the non-stenosis group, cholangitis was relatively mild and treated with antibiotics. Hepatobiliary scintigraphy for these cases showed bile congestion in the jejunum near the site of the hepaticojejunostomy. CONCLUSION: There are two types of postoperative cholangitis, each with different pathogenesis and treatment. It is essential to assess anastomotic stenosis early and provide the necessary treatment.


Subject(s)
Cholangitis , Hepatectomy , Humans , Hepatectomy/adverse effects , Incidence , Retrospective Studies , Quality of Life , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/etiology , Cholangitis/epidemiology , Cholangitis/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology
2.
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci ; 23(8): 480-8, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27247050

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: For the establishment of personalized therapy, we investigated biomarkers that can contribute to the selection of adjuvant therapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: Between 2005 and 2014, of 141 consecutive patients with PDAC who underwent R0 or R1 resection, 61 patients given gemcitabine and 31 patients given S-1 as adjuvant therapy were enrolled. We evaluated the correlation between treatment outcomes and the expressions of intratumoral human antigen R (HuR), human equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (hENT1), thymidylate synthetase (TS) and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in clinicopathological features between the gemcitabine and S-1 groups. Among those with high HuR expression and high hENT1 expression, the disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly higher with gemcitabine than with S-1 (MST: 26.2 vs. 11.8 months, P = 0.024; 20.2 vs. 10.2 months, P = 0.029, respectively). Moreover, high HuR/hENT1 (high HuR or high hENT1) was significantly associated with better outcome for gemcitabine (HR for DFS: 0.43, P = 0.027) and low HuR/hENT1 was significantly associated with worse outcome for gemcitabine (HR for DFS: 2.24, P = 0.021). TS and DPD expression levels were not informative in this examination. CONCLUSIONS: HuR and hENT1 were good candidates as selective biomarkers and this study's concept could contribute to personalized therapy for PDAC patients.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/drug therapy , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Oxonic Acid/administration & dosage , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Precision Medicine , Tegafur/administration & dosage , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biopsy, Needle , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/mortality , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/surgery , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Cohort Studies , Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage , Disease-Free Survival , Drug Combinations , Female , Hospitals, University , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Japan , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Pancreatectomy/methods , Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Patient Selection , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Statistics, Nonparametric , Survival Rate , Gemcitabine
3.
Medical Education ; : 207-213, 1995.
Article in Japanese | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-369496

ABSTRACT

The importance of medical education and technical cooperation with developing countries is emphasized. As an example, we looked at the residency program of the Department of Surgery, Santa Cruz General Hospital. Provision for postgraduate medical education is quite important in developing countries in order to prevent promising young doctors from leaving the country. Moreover, the curriculum for postgraduate education should be developed in accordance with the health situation of the respective countries. Technical cooperation should be carried out with a long-term perspective, focusing on human resource development, in this case the young doctors. From now on, it will not only be technical experts, but also medical education experts that will be needed in developing countries.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL