Risk-reducing decisions regarding germline BRCA pathogenic variant: focusing on the timing of genetic testing and RRSO.

BACKGROUND: In Japan, the public insurance policy was revised in 2020 to cover hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), including genetic testing and surveillance, for patients with breast cancer (BC). Consequently, the demand for risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) has increased. This study aimed to clarify the changes in the demand and timing of genetic testing and RRSO associated with public insurance coverage for HBOC in Japan. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 350 women with germline BRCA (gBRCA) pathogenic variants (PVs) who had visited gynaecologists; they received gBRCA genetic testing at 45.1±10.6 (20-74) years. The use of medical testing and preventive treatment was compared between the preinsurance and postinsurance groups using Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: The findings indicate that RRSO rates doubled from 31.4% to 62.6% among patients with gBRCA-PV. The implementation rate was 32.4% among unaffected carriers and 70.3% among BC-affected patients. Younger patients received genetic testing with significantly shorter intervals between BC diagnosis and genetic testing and between genetic testing and RRSO. CONCLUSION: Overall, the insurance coverage for HBOC patients with BC has increased the frequency of RRSO in Japan. However, a comparison between the number of probands and family members indicated that the diagnosis among family members is inadequate. The inequality in the use of genetic services by socioeconomic groups is an issue of further concern.

Stakeholder Perception of the Implementation of Genetic Risk Testing for Twelve Multifactorial Diseases.

Genome-wide association studies have been employed to develop numerous risk prediction models using polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for multifactorial diseases. However, healthcare providers lack confidence in their understanding of PRS risk stratification for multifactorial diseases, which underscores the need to assess the readiness of PRSs for clinical use. To address this issue, we surveyed the perceptions of healthcare providers as stakeholders in the clinical implementation of genetic-based risk prediction for multifactorial diseases. We conducted a web-based study on the need for risk prediction based on genetic information and the appropriate timing of testing for 12 multifactorial diseases. Responses were obtained from 506 stakeholders. Positive perceptions of genetic risk testing were found for adult-onset chronic diseases. As per participant opinion, testing for adult-onset diseases should be performed after the age of 20 years, whereas testing for psychiatric and allergic disorders that manifest during childhood should be performed from birth to 19 years of age. The stakeholders recognized the need for genetic risk testing for diseases that develop in adulthood, believing that the appropriate testing time is after maturity. This study contributes to the discussion on the clinical implementation of the PRS for genetic risk prediction of multifactorial diseases.

Significance of prostate/pancreatic/skin cancer family history for detecting BRCA2 pathogenic variant careers among patients with breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: When considering BRCA1/2 genetic testing for diagnosis of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), family history (FH) of breast and ovarian cancer is commonly considered. However, FH of other HBOC-related cancers, such as prostate, pancreatic, and skin cancer (malignant melanoma), is often overlooked. METHODS: Among 945 patients who received genetic testing of BRCA1/2 at our hospital between October 2010 and September 2021, we compared the FH of 123 patients diagnosed with HBOC and 669 other patients who had breast cancer and had a documented FH. This study focused on the FH of HBOC-related cancers such as breast, ovarian, prostate, pancreatic, and skin cancer, as well as colorectal, gastric, liver, lung, and uterine cancers, which are common among Japanese, and other cancers. RESULTS: FH of prostate, pancreatic, and skin cancer was significantly higher in the BRCA2 pathogenic variant (PV) cases than in the wild-type (WT) cases. The mean number of family members are as follows: BRCA1 PV/ BRCA2 PV/ WT; prostate cancer: 0.05/ 0.34/ 0.09 (P < 0.0001, Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparisons test), pancreatic cancer: 0.13/ 0.21/ 0.10 (P = 0.01637), and skin cancer: 0.03/ 0.07/ 0.01 (P = 0.00129), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: When considering BRCA1/2 genetic testing, FH of prostate, pancreatic, and skin cancers may also be examined as HBOC-related cancers to provide testing for patients who would benefit from it. However, further studies for the association between skin cancer and HBOC will be required because it has not been reported in Japan.

Initial screening by immunohistochemistry is effective in universal screening for Lynch syndrome in endometrial cancer patients: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Few prospective reports of universal screening for Lynch syndrome exist for patients with endometrial cancer. In this study, we performed immunohistochemical staining for DNA mismatch repair-related genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2), to determine the extent to which Lynch syndrome can be diagnosed in endometrial cancer patients through universal screening. METHODS: We recruited 116 consecutive patients assumed to have uterine corpus malignancy from October 2019 to February 2021 in a prospective observational study. We performed immunohistochemical for mismatch repair-related proteins on samples from 100 patients who had surgicopathologically confirmed diagnoses of endometrial cancer. Samples with missing immunohistochemical results for any of the proteins had subsequent universal screening tests for microsatellite instability, DNA methylation of the MLH1 promoter region and mismatch repair genetics. RESULTS: We identified 19 (19.0%) patients with lost results for any of the proteins. All 19 patient samples had subsequent screening tests. We identified the microsatellite instability-high phenotype in 84.2% (16/19) of these patients and MLH1 methylation in 57.9% (11/19). Mismatch repair genetic testing detected two pathological variants, in MSH2 and MSH6, which indicated that the prevalence of Lynch syndrome was 2.0% in our cohort. Two cases of unclassified variant (MSH6) and one case of benign variant (PMS2) were also detected. CONCLUSIONS: Initial screening by immunohistochemical is an effective method in universal screening for Lynch syndrome in endometrial cancer patients.