Increased prevalence of microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes patients with the metabolic syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Microvascular complications of diabetes contribute significantly to the disease morbidity. The metabolic syndrome is common among subjects with diabetes and is a very important risk factor for macrovascular complications. However, its contribution to the microvascular complication has not been assessed. OBJECTIVES: To assess the risk of microvascular complications associated with the metabolic syndrome in diabetes subjects. METHODS: The study group comprised 415 diabetic subjects attending a primary care clinic. The prevalence of microvascular complications was compared between 270 diabetic subjects with metabolic syndrome (NCEP-III criteria) and 145 diabetic patients without. RESULTS: We found that as a group, diabetic subjects with metabolic syndrome had a significantly higher frequency of microvascular-related complications than diabetic subjects without the syndrome (46.6% and 26.8% respectively, P= 0.0005). These include microalbuminuria (41.5% vs. 23.9%, P= 0.013), neuropathy (10.4% vs. 7.5%, P = 0.38), retinopathy (9.6% vs. 4.1%, P = 0.046) and leg ulcers (7.9% vs. 2.8%, P = 0.044). After adjustment for age, gender, glycemic control, disease duration, lipid profile and blood pressure, metabolic syndrome was associated with a significantly higher risk of microvascular complications: odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for nephropathy 2.27 (1.53-3.34), neuropathy 1.77 (0.79-4.0), retinopathy 3.42 (1.2-9.87), and leg ulcers 3.57 (1.08-11.95). CONCLUSIONS: In addition to hyperglycemia and disease duration, the metabolic syndrome is a significant risk factor for the development of microvascular complications in diabetic subjects.

Different contributions of insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction in overweight Israeli Arabs with IFG and IGT.

BACKGROUND: Impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and impaired fasting glucose (IFG) are both intermediate stages that exist between normal glucose tolerance and overt type 2 diabetes. Epidemiological studies demonstrated that the two categories define distinct populations. In this study, we examined the contributions of insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction to both states in overweight subjects of Arab origin. METHODS: Twelve subjects with isolated IFG, 10 with isolated IGT, and 20 with IFG and IGT (combined glucose in tolerance-CGT) were compared with 30 subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) subjects; all were of Arab origin and were overweight or obese. Different indices for insulin resistance and beta-cell function were calculated from oral glucose tolerance (OGTT) values. RESULTS: Subjects with isolated IFG and CGT were more obese and had significantly higher values of insulin resistance than subjects with isolated IGT and NFG. There was no significant difference between the insulin resistance in subjects with isolated IGT and that in subjects with NGT. Indices of beta cell function were severely reduced among subjects with isolated IGT and CGT when compared with those with both isolated IFG and NGT, while subjects with isolated IFG had similar beta-cell indices to subjects with NGT. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that beta-cell dysfunction and insulin resistance contribute differently to the pathogenesis of IFG and IGT among overweight Arab subjects.

High frequency of pre-diabetes, undiagnosed diabetes and metabolic syndrome among overweight Arabs in Israel.

BACKGROUND: Increased insulin resistance, which is associated with obesity, is believed to underlie the development of metabolic syndrome. It is also known to increase the risk for the development of glucose intolerance and type 2 diabetes. Both conditions are recognized as causing a high rate of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence of metabolic syndrome and different glucose intolerance states in healthy, overweight Arab individuals attending a primary healthcare clinic in Israel. METHODS: We randomly recruited 95 subjects attending a primary healthcare clinic who were healthy, overweight (body mass index > 27) and above the age of 40. Medical and family history was obtained and anthropometric parameters were measured. Blood chemistry and oral glucose tolerance test were performed after overnight fasting. RESULTS: Twenty-seven percent of the subjects tested had undiagnosed type 2 diabetes according to WHO criteria, 42% had impaired fasting glucose and/or impaired glucose tolerance and only 31% had a normal OGTT. Metabolic syndrome was found in 48% according to criteria of the U.S. National Cholesterol Education Program, with direct correlation of this condition with BMI and insulin resistance calculated by homeostasis model assessment. Subjects with metabolic syndrome had a higher risk for abnormality in glucose metabolism, and the more metabolic syndrome components the subject had the higher was the risk for abnormal glucose metabolism. Metabolic syndrome predicted the result of OGTT with 0.67 sensitivity and 0.78 specificity. When combined with IFG, sensitivity was 0.83 and specificity 0.86 for predicting the OGTT result. CONCLUSIONS: According to our initial evaluation approximately 70% of the overweight Arab population in Israel has either metabolic syndrome or abnormal glucose metabolism, indicating that they are at high risk to develop type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. This population is likely to benefit from an intervention program.

Perinatal significance of diagnosing glucose intolerance during pregnancy with portable glucose meter.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect on perinatal outcome of replacing glucose measurements for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus in central laboratories with those obtained by portable glucose meter. STUDY DESIGN: Simultaneously, venous blood samples were taken at the 100-g glucose tolerance test, and finger capillary blood glucose levels were also measured with a portable glucose meter in 180 pregnant patients. Patient management was according to the venous plasma glucose results. Following deliveries, the women were reallocated to diagnostic groups by both methods of measurements and by using the same cutoff values, and the outcome data were compared. RESULTS: By using glucose values obtained by portable glucose meters instead of the results attained in the central laboratory, more women were diagnosed with gestational diabetes (33 vs 25) and the perinatal outcome was comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Obstetricians have to identify glucose intolerance during pregnancy in order to prevent macrosomia and its perinatal complications. These goals can be achieved with at least the same efficacy by performing the 100-g glucose tolerance test with a portable glucose meter as with current laboratory methods. Such an approach is time and resource saving and more convenient for both patients and health providers.