Symptoms and disease severity in lung transplant candidates co-managed with palliative care.

BACKGROUND: Lung transplant (LTx) candidates experience significant respiratory symptoms often necessitating palliative care (PC) support. We aimed to describe symptoms experienced by interstitial lung disease (ILD) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) LTx candidates referred for PC using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) and to assess the change in ESAS in relation to pre-LTx exercise capacity, oxygen requirements, and respiratory exacerbations. Understanding symptom trajectory of these two patient groups will help inform PC management. METHODS: Single centre, retrospective cohort of 102 ILD and 24 COPD LTx candidates who were assessed in the Toronto Transplant PC Clinic (TPCC) from 2014-2017. Chi-square and t-tests were used to compare clinical characteristics, physiological parameters, and ESAS scores. RESULTS: The most common symptom in ILD and COPD patients was dyspnea (median score of 8, cough 7, fatigue 6). ILD patients reported higher cough scores (7 vs. 4, P<0.001). There was no association between the change in ESAS domains and six-minute walk distance (6MWD), oxygen requirements, or respiratory exacerbations, despite increased oxygen requirements and a greater decline in 6MWD in ILD compared to COPD pre-LTx (-47 vs. -8 meters, P=0.01). ILD candidates who were delisted/died compared to those transplanted, experienced worse depression (median ESAS; 4.5 vs. 1), anxiety (5.5 vs. 2) and dyspnea (9.5 vs. 8); P<0.05. CONCLUSIONS: ILD patients had similar symptoms as COPD patients, despite increased oxygen requirements and decreasing 6MWD pre-LTx. This study highlights the importance of symptom management of LTx candidates co-managed with PC, independent of traditional measures of disease severity.

Plasma transfusion practices: A multicentre electronic audit.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Plasma is often transfused to patients with bleeding or requiring invasive procedures and with abnormal tests of coagulation. Chart audits find half of plasma transfusions unnecessary, resulting in avoidable complications and costs. This multicentre electronic audit was conducted to determine the proportion of plasma transfused without an indication and/or at a sub-therapeutic dose. METHODS: Data were extracted on adult inpatients in 2017 at five academic sites from the hospital electronic chart, laboratory information systems and the Canadian Institute for Health Information Discharge Abstract Database. Electronic criteria for plasma transfusion outside recommended indications were: (1) international normalized ratio (INR) < 1.5 with no to moderate bleeding; (2) INR ≥ 1.5, with no to mild bleeding and no planned procedures; and (3) no INR before or after plasma infusion. Sub-therapeutic dose was defined as ≤2 units transfused. RESULTS: In 1 year, 2590 patients received 6088 plasma transfusions encompassing 11,490 units of plasma occurred at the five sites. 77.7% of events were either outside indications or under-dosed. Of these, 34.8% of plasma orders had no indication identified, and 62% of these occurred in non-bleeding patients and no planned procedure with an isolated elevated INR. 70.7% of transfusions were under-dosed. Most plasma transfusions occurred in the intensive care unit or the operating room. Inter-hospital variability in peri-transfusion testing and dosing was observed. CONCLUSION: The majority of plasma transfusions are sub-optimal. Local hospital culture may be an important driver. Electronic audits, with definitions employed in this study, may be a practical alternative to costly chart audits.

Approach to red blood cell antibody testing during pregnancy: Answers to commonly asked questions.

OBJECTIVE: To provide family physicians with an understanding of blood bank tests performed during pregnancy. The value of routine blood type and antibody tests, as well as the follow-up required when a patient develops a red blood cell antibody or experiences a fetal-maternal hemorrhage (FMH) will be reviewed. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: The approach described is based on the authors' clinical expertise and peer-reviewed literature from 1967 to 2020. MAIN MESSAGE: An ABO and RhD group and antibody screen test is performed on every pregnant patient during the first trimester. Although antibodies to red blood cell antigens occur infrequently, some can lead to substantial adverse fetal or neonatal consequences including hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Early identification and quantification of important antibodies ensures that at-risk mothers are referred to and followed by obstetricians experienced with high-risk care. Another valuable and related test is the FMH test. For RhD-negative women, these tests are performed at every delivery and following antepartum events that could contribute to FMH. This test determines the number of fetal red blood cells in the maternal circulation and is used to determine the dose of Rh immune globulin an RhD-negative mother requires to prevent alloimmunization to fetal RhD. CONCLUSION: An understanding of blood bank tests performed during pregnancy and their role and limitations is vital to optimal practice and aids clinicians in their decision making. When there is doubt or confusion regarding antenatal testing or immunoprophylaxis, consult the regional laboratory or transfusion medicine specialists for additional guidance.

Drosophila genomes and the development of affordable molecular markers for species genotyping.

The recent completion of genome sequencing of 12 species of Drosophila has provided a powerful resource for hypothesis testing, as well as the development of technical tools. Here we take advantage of genome sequence data from two closely related species of Drosophila, Drosophila simulans and Drosophila sechellia, to quickly identify candidate molecular markers for genotyping based on expected insertion or deletion (indel) differences between species. Out of 64 candidate molecular markers selected along the second and third chromosome of Drosophila, 51 molecular markers were validated using PCR and gel electrophoresis. We found that the 20% error rate was due to sequencing errors in the genome data, although we cannot rule out possible indel polymorphisms. The approach has the advantage of being affordable and quick, as it only requires the use of bioinformatics tools for predictions and a PCR and agarose gel based assay for validation. Moreover, the approach could be easily extended to a wide variety of taxa with the only limitation being the availability of complete or partial genome sequence data.