[Current approach in the follow-up treatment of joint-preserving operations on the knee joint in German-speaking countries]. / Aktuelles Vorgehen in der Nachbehandlung gelenkerhaltender Operationen am Kniegelenk im deutschsprachigen Raum.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative follow-up after joint-preserving knee surgery involves conventional physiotherapy as well as other approaches and devices such as CPM and CAM splints, TENS devices, BFR exercise, prehabilitation, and digital health applications. The aim of this survey was to investigate current standards, trends and control methods in postoperative care to identify fields of concern and to compare them with the current literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a structured anonymous online survey of specialists in orthopaedics and trauma surgery listed by the German-speaking Society for Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery (AGA). The questionnaire included 36 closed-ended questions on the follow-up of joint-preserving surgery of the knee joint. RESULTS: Questionnaires from 528 participants with long-term professional experience (86.6% with more than 10 years) were analysed. Standardised post-treatment schemes are used by 97.2% and their evidence is estimated to be high (59.1%) / very high (14.8%). Problems of rehabilitation are seen in 10-20% of cases by 87.3% (persistent muscular atrophy 30.9%). After reconstructive surgery, CPM splints (70.1%), CAM splints (42.1%), orthoses (85.0%) and TENS devices (40.0%) are prescribed. More potent approaches for the treatment of postoperative muscle deficits are desired by 89.4%. BFR exercise is known by 41.7% and is used regularly by 8%. Communication with treating physiotherapists is infrequent (written: 27.5%). Digital rehabilitation management would be supported by 83.3%; 22.7% are not aware of digital health applications. 87.9% of participants believe that prehabilitation can affect postoperative outcomes. CONCLUSION: Follow-up of knee joint-preserving surgeries is usually standardised and regularly reviewed for up-to-date evidence. The evidence for recommendations made is considered high. Orthoses are usually used after reconstructive surgery, persistent muscle atrophy is a major problem, BFR training is only known to a limited extent, and there is currently a lack of standardised training protocols. Communication with physiotherapists needs to be improved. Digital rehabilitation management is rarely used but would be supported by the majority of surgeons.

Biomechanical Properties of Repair Cartilage Tissue Are Superior Following Microdrilling Compared to Microfracturing in Critical Size Cartilage Defects.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Common surgical treatment options for large focal chondral defects (FCDs) in the knee include microfracturing (MFX) and microdrilling (DRL). Despite numerous studies addressing MFX and DRL of FDCs, no in vivo study has focused on biomechanical analysis of repair cartilage tissue in critical size FCDs with different amounts of holes and penetration depths. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two round FCDs (d=6 mm) were created on the medial femoral condyle in 33 adult merino sheep. All 66 defects were randomly assigned to 1 control or 4 different study groups: 1) MFX1, 3 holes, 2 mm depth; 2) MFX2, 3 holes, 4 mm depth; 3) DRL1, 3 holes, 4 mm depth; and 4) DRL2, 6 holes, 4 mm depth. Animals were followed up for 1 year. Following euthanasia, quantitative optical analysis of defect filling was performed. Biomechanical properties were analysed with microindentation and calculation of the elastic modulus. RESULTS: Quantitative assessment of defect filling showed significantly better results in all treatment groups compared to untreated FCDs in the control group (p<0.001), with the best results for DRL2 (84.2% filling). The elastic modulus of repair cartilage tissue in the DRL1 and DRL2 groups was comparable to the adjacent native hyaline cartilage, while significantly inferior results were identified in both MFX groups (MFX1: p=0.002; MFX2: p<0.001). CONCLUSION: More defect filling and better biomechanical properties of the repair cartilage tissue were identified for DRL compared to MFX, with the best results for 6 holes and 4 mm of penetration depth. These findings are in contrast to the current clinical practice with MFX as the gold standard and suggest a clinical return to DRL.

Patient response to osteotomy around the knee joint at one year post-operation-fulfilment of expectations and current health status.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to investigate patient satisfaction and fulfilment of expectations after osteotomy around the knee at one year postoperatively, using patient-related outcome measures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From the initial sample of 264 patients, a total of 132 patients (age 48y ± 11) were enrolled in this prospective study (response rate 49.3%). Data were collected using the Hospital For Special Surgery-Knee Surgery Expectations Survey (HFSS-KSES), items for satisfaction and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) measures. At one year postoperative follow-up, an individualized questionnaire asked whether the specific person-related expectations had been fulfilled. RESULTS: Satisfaction was high with 83.2% of all participants at one year after surgery. A total of 78% of patients stated they would decide to do the surgery again. This decision was significantly associated with satisfaction, younger age and better KOOS scores scales before surgery for pain, activity and sports. We found high correlations between satisfaction and fulfilment of expectations for the HFES-KSES. Fulfilment of expectations one year after surgery was significantly associated with significant improvements in KOOS scales at one year post-operation. Expectations (1) "to get the knee back to normal status", (2) "improve ability to squat", (3) "improve ability to run", (4) "improve ability to kneel" had been fulfilled worst. A multiple linear regression model for satisfaction had an R2 = 0.797 of the variance. The most influential was the variable fulfilment of "maintain health" that had 70.7% of variance. CONCLUSIONS: The fulfilled expectation concerning an improvement of the ability to maintain health was the most influential parameter for satisfaction at one year post-osteotomy. Patients with better health status of the knee and younger age rated the surgery to be more positive and were also more likely to do the surgery again. This provides an indication for an earlier intervention, before the knee and overall health status becomes more detrimental. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II (Therapeutic study).

Low postoperative complication rate with high survival rate and good clinical outcome 9 years after autologous chondrocyte transplantation of the knee joint.

PURPOSE: To investigate postoperative complications and associated risk factors for failure following autologous chondrocyte transplantation ("ACT") as well as its long-term survival and clinical function. It was hypothesized that ACT is a safe technique for cartilage repair with a low incidence of postoperative complications and rare rates of revision surgery combined with a high long-term survival and good to excellent clinical outcome in long-term-follow-up. METHODS: All patients undergoing ACT-Cs of the knee joint between 2006 and 2012 at the author's institution were included in this retrospective study. Concomitant procedures had been performed if necessary. Early postoperative complications, revision surgeries, failure and risk factors for those events were evaluated 6 months after the surgery. Long-term clinical outcome was assessed using the Lysholm Score, the Tegner Score, a 10-grade scale for satisfaction and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at a minimum follow-up of 9 years postoperatively. Long-term survival was calculated using revision surgeries, clinical failures and conversion procedures to create a Kaplan-Meier analysis. A subgroup analysis for different defect locations was performed. 139 patients were included in this study (27% female/ 73%male; age 26.7 [21.7; 35.2] years). The median defect size was 4.0 [3.0; 6.0] cm2 (40% medial femoral condyle (MFC), 17% lateral femoral condyle (LFC), 36% patella, 19% trochlea). 97 (70%) of the patients had undergone previous surgery and 84 (60%) underwent concomitant procedures. RESULTS: Postoperatively, 8% of patients had complications (4% bleeding, 2% arthrofibrosis, 2% infection), 7% of patients needed revision surgery. 12% of patients had a prolonged deficit in ROM, that did not require revision surgery. No significant difference in terms of complications was found between the patellofemoral and femorotibial group. Patients demonstrated good patient reported long-term outcomes 9-15 years after the index surgery (Tegner: 4.7 ± 1.8; VAS: 2.4 ± 2.1; Lysholm: 80 ± 14; satisfaction with operation: 7.3 ± 1.9). Survival rates were 88% at 9 years, 85% at 11 years, and 85% at 13 years after the index procedure. Reasons for failure included debridement of ACT (n = 4; 5%), revision ACT (n = 3, 3%), conversion to total knee arthroplasty (n = 3, 3%) and conversion to High tibial osteotomy (HTO) (n = 1; 1%)). CONCLUSION: The present study indicates ACT as an effective treatment option for femorotibial- as well as patellofemoral cartilage defects with a high long-term survival and low conversion rate as well as good long-term results regarding knee function and satisfaction. Postoperative complications needing revision surgery are rare. Prolongated deficits of range of motion appear frequently up to six months especially in patellofemoral defects, but can often be successfully addressed by intensified physiotherapy without requiring an arthrolysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Patients with complex proximal tibial fractures overestimate the prognosis of their injury.

PURPOSE: To investigate, if patients with complex proximal tibial fracture have realistic expectations on open reduction and internal fixation. METHODS: 114 patients (mean 49 years, SD ± 13) with closed AO-type B and C proximal tibial fracture were grouped (group B, respectively C). Prior to surgery expectations concerning knee function, pain, return to work/sports, and the risk for osteoarthritis was assessed with the Hospital for Special Surgery-Knee Surgery Expectations Survey (HFSS-KSE) and a non-validated ten-item survey. RESULTS: 92% of patients expected at least an almost natural knee postoperatively. All items regarding restoring knee function were ranked to be at least important in both groups. 65% in group B and 47% in group C expected at most occasional pain. 83% in group B and 67% in group C expected full return to work without any limitations. Patients with low physical work intensity expected significantly shorter incapacity to work in both groups (7.8, respectively 8.9 weeks). 71% in group B and 60% in group C expected to return to sports with at most small limitations. 33% in group B and 22% in group C assumed risk for osteoarthritis will be prevented by surgery. CONCLUSION: Expectations on surgery for complex proximal tibial fracture are high regardless of fracture type. The prognosis of many health and lifestyle domains was overestimated. The risk for osteoarthritis was underestimated. This study should sensitize surgeons to discuss realistic expectations. This may help to improve patient comprehension what leads to sensible expectations, resulting in improved patients´ satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 14104, Date of registration: 06/2015.

Surgeons' expectations of osteotomies around the knee.

INTRODUCTION: High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a valid and joint preserving surgical technique to treat medial degenerative osteoarthritis (OA) in young and active patients. A recent study shows that patients' expectations of osteotomy around the knee are high, but OA progression and potential conversion to a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were underestimated. The aim of this study was to investigate surgeons' expectations of HTO and to compare the results to the patients' expectations and actual outcomes reported in the literature. METHODS: 461 surgeons were questioned online using the 'Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Surgery Expectations Survey (HFSS-KSES)' and a ten-item non-validated questionnaire to investigate the expectations of HTO. Two subgroups were formed to investigate differences regarding the surgeons' experience. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics. RESULTS: Surgeons' expectations of HTO were rated between very and little important with pain reduction being the most important item on the HFSS-KSES. Furthermore, 'improving the ability to walk', 'to perform daily activities', 'having confidence in the knee', and 'avoiding future degeneration' were rated of high importance. An important difference regarding the experience was the lower expectations on delay/prevention of TKA of less-experienced surgeons. CONCLUSION: Surgeons' expectations of HTO are high but nevertheless different to the patients' expectations reported in the literature. Also, expectations for the delay/prevention of TKA differed regarding the experience of surgeons. While pain reduction represents one of the most important items for surgeons and patients, the expected outcome regarding the delay/prevention of a TKA and returning to sports differs to the patients' expectations and to the actual outcome reported in the literature. This should be considered when performing the preoperative informed consent.

Patients' expectations of osteotomies around the knee are high regarding activities of daily living.

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to investigate patients' expectations on high tibial osteotomies, distal femur osteotomies, and double-level osteotomies in different health-related domains. It was hypothesized that expectations are high in terms of capacity to work, pain relief, and restoring knee function. METHODS: A total of 264 patients (age 47 years ± 11 years) were enrolled in this study from March 2015 until May 2016 in seven specialized orthopaedic surgery departments. Data were collected via the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, the Hospital for Special Surgery-Knee Surgery Expectations Survey, and a ten-item (non-validated) questionnaire to specifically ask about expectations of osteotomies around the knee 24-48 h prior to surgery. In addition, self-efficacy was assessed. Parametric tests were used to test the hypothesis. RESULTS: Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score test results showed that all patients suffered because of their knee impairments prior to surgery. All participants had high expectations in all aspects regarding the surgical outcome: on a four-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (very important) to 4 (not important), all mean values were between 1.2 and 1.7. For patients who had a demanding physical work, the ability to keep a stressful working posture was more important than for other patients (i.e. to kneel, to squat). Furthermore, preoperative lower quality of life was associated with higher expectations concerning improving the ability to walk, to achieve improvements in activities of daily living and social well-being. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' expectations of osteotomies around the knee are high in terms of capacity to work, pain relief, and restoring functions. The natural course of osteoarthritis and the potential need for conversion to TKA were underestimated by a substantial proportion of the study population. However, the expectation regarding survival rate is in line with the reported literature. The results of this study should assist surgeons in discussing realistic expectations when considering and counselling patients regarding osteotomies around the knee. This may help to clarify realistic expectations preoperatively and ultimately improve patients' satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level II.

[Standards in rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the German-speaking world]. / Standards in der Nachbehandlung nach vorderem Kreuzbandersatz im deutschsprachigen Raum.

INTRODUCTION: Rehabilitation protocols following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction often differ among orthopaedic surgeons. The primary aim of this study was to investigate which follow-up treatment is recommended by "AGA instructors" certified by the German-speaking Association for Arthroscopic and Open Joint Surgery (AGA). The secondary aim was to compare these findings with the current literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A structured anonymous online survey was performed with "AGA instructors" specialised in knee or ACL surgery. All participants were asked about their recommendations for rehabilitation following isolated ACL reconstruction using a questionnaire containing 23 items. RESULTS: 117 out of 218 mail questionnaires were fully completed and analysed. 96.5 % of all surgeons allowed full weight-bearing after 4 weeks or earlier, 52.6 % put a limit on knee flexion, 9.7 % on knee extension after the operation. A brace was prescribed by 82.8 % of all participants. During the first six weeks, isometric training and closed-chain exercises were recommended by the majority of surgeons. Riding a bicycle or driving a car after 6 weeks or earlier was permitted by 78.5 % and 86.2 %, respectively. Jogging (65.5 %) or jumping activities (67.0 %) were allowed after 3 months or earlier. Skiing (53.0 %) or contact/team sport (55.2 % / 46.2 %) was often permitted after 12 months. 82.6 % of all surgeons would like to use return-to-sport test protocols. CONCLUSION: Rehabilitation protocols differ significantly even among experienced knee surgeons working as instructors. Their recommendations are often not evidence-based considering the current literature.

Patients' expectations of shoulder instability repair.

PURPOSE: To analyze and compare patient expectations of primary and revision shoulder stabilization and to assess the factors associated with patients' expectations. METHODS: Pre-operative patient expectations after shoulder instability repair were prospectively assessed using a self-designed questionnaire. The survey included questions on the expected level and type of return to sports, instability, pain, risk of osteoarthritis, and overall shoulder condition. RESULTS: One-hundred and forty-five patients (99 primary; 46 revision repair) were included. A return to sport at the same level with slight to no restrictions was expected in 95%, a return to high-risk activities in 34%, to moderate in 58%, and to low-risk activities in 9%. No pain [instability] independent of the activity level was expected by 71% [79%] and occasional pain [instability] during contact and overhead activities by 25% [19%]. 61% expected to have no risk of glenohumeral osteoarthritis, 37% a slight, and 2% a significant risk. The overall expectation for the post-operative shoulder was indicated to be normal or nearly normal in 99% of patients. The revision group did not differ from the primary repair group in any variable. High pre-operative sport performance was positively correlated with post-operative sport expectations. The number of dislocations, the duration of instability, and the subjective instability level were negatively correlated with return to sport expectations. CONCLUSION: Patient expectations for primary and revision shoulder instability repair are high. Realistic patient expectations regarding the surgical procedure are necessary to avoid low patient satisfaction, especially in pre-operatively highly active and demanding athletes. The surgeon must not solely base the treatment on the pathology and possible risk factors for failure but should also take the individual expectation of the patient into account. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Patient satisfaction with health is substantially improved following ACL reconstruction.

PURPOSE: To prospectively monitor health-related quality of life and return to work after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in patients with isolated ACL tears. METHODS: Sixty consecutive patients with isolated ACL tears who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction were prospectively monitored using the "Questions on Life Satisfaction Modules" (FLZM) and "Short-Form 12 (SF-12)" quality-of-life outcome measures. The Lysholm score and Tegner activity index were used as functional outcome measures. Additionally, return to work (months) together with level of physical workload was analysed. Outcome measures were assessed the day before surgery and at 6, 12 weeks and 6, 12, and 24 months post-operatively. Quality-of-life outcomes were correlated with functional outcome scores. RESULTS: Satisfaction with health (FLZM) significantly improved within the first 2 years (p < 0.05), and the physical component scale (SF12) showed a significantly higher score after 3, 6, 12 and 24 months as compared with preoperative values (p < 0.05). "General life satisfaction (FLZM)" was initially decreased at 6 weeks (p < 0.05) but increased during the further follow-up period, reaching a score not significantly different from preoperative values. Mean Lysholm score improved from 66 preoperatively to 89 post-operatively (p < 0.05) and the median Tegner activity index improved from four to six points (p < 0.05) at final follow-up. Mean time to return to work was 7 weeks (range 1-34 weeks), and it strongly depended on physical workload. A positive correlation between quality of life and functional outcome (Lysholm score) was observed. CONCLUSION: General life satisfaction is impaired during the early post-operative course, but returns to preoperative values after 2 years. Satisfaction with health reaches higher values after 6, 12 and 24 months post-operatively, and the SF-12 physical component scale was seen to improve during the follow-up period. Improved functional outcomes were observed to correlate with quality-of-life measurements. Thus, patients can preoperatively be informed that they will benefit from ACL reconstruction in terms of an improved knee function and satisfaction with health. Heavy physical workload must be considered as a risk factor for prolonged time lost to return to work. These patients have to be identified and informed about realistic expectations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

How Satisfied Are Patients with Arthroscopic Bankart Repair? A 2-Year Follow-up on Quality-of-Life Outcome.

PURPOSE: To report general life and health satisfaction after arthroscopic Bankart repair in patients with post-traumatic recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability and to investigate postoperative time lost to return to work at 2-year follow-up. METHODS: Between 2011 and 2013 patients treated with arthroscopic Bankart repair in the beach chair position for acute shoulder instability were included in this study. Questions on Life Satisfaction Modules (FLZM) and the Short Form 12 (SF-12) were used as quality-of-life outcome scales. Oxford Instability Score (OIS), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH), and self-reported American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder index were used as functional outcome scales. Return to work (months) was monitored and analyzed depending on physical workload. Data were assessed the day before surgery and prospectively monitored until 24 months postoperatively. Quality-of-life outcome was correlated with functional shoulder outcome and compared with normative age-adjusted data. Paired t-test, Wilcoxon test, Mann-Whitney U-Test, and Spearman's correlation coefficient were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were prospectively included. The mean age at surgery was 29.4 years. Satisfaction with general life and satisfaction with health (FLZM) as well as physical component scale (SF-12) improved significantly to values above normative data within 6 to 12 months after surgery (each P < .001). OIS, QuickDASH, and ASES improved significantly from baseline until 24 months after surgery (each P < .001). For ASES, improvement above minimal clinically important difference was shown. There was a positive correlation between quality of life and functional outcome scores (P < .05; rho, 0.3-0.4). Mean time to return to work was 2 months (range, 0-10; standard deviation, 1.9), with significantly longer time intervals observed in patients with heavy physical workload (3.1 months; range, 0 to 10; standard deviation, 2.4; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Following arthroscopic Bankart repair, quality of life was impaired during early course after surgery and increased significantly above preoperative levels within 6 to 12 months after the procedure. A steady state of excellent quality-of-life and functional outcomes was noted after 12 months of follow-up. Quality-of-life outcome scales correlated significantly with the functional outcome. Heavy physical workload must be considered as a risk factor for prolonged time lost to return to work. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prospective noncomparative therapeutic case series.

Meniscal injuries in children and adolescents undergoing surgical treatment for tibial eminence fractures.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the prevalence and characteristics of meniscal injuries in children and adolescents undergoing surgical treatment for tibial eminence fractures and to test for possible relationships between associated meniscal lesions and patient demographics or injury characteristics. METHODS: A prospective multicenter study was conducted to arthroscopically assess the prevalence and characteristics of meniscal injuries in children and adolescents undergoing surgical treatment for tibial eminence fractures between 04/2014 and 10/2015. Patient demographics and injury characteristics were assessed preoperatively. The presence of a meniscal injury was evaluated arthroscopically and characterized according to tear type and location (Cooper classification). Patients with and without meniscal injuries were compared with regard to sex, age, height, weight, BMI, type of injury, mechanism of injury, time to surgery, Tanner stage, sexual maturity (prepubescent vs. pubescent), and modified Meyers and McKeever classification. RESULTS: A total of 54 consecutive patients (65 % males, mean age: 12.5 ± 3.2 years) were enrolled. Meniscal injury were found in 20 patients (37 %). The lateral meniscus was involved in 18 patients (90 % of all meniscus injuries) and the medial meniscus in 2 patients (10 % of all meniscus injuries). The most common tear pattern was a longitudinal tear of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus (30 % of all meniscus injuries) and the second most common tear was a root detachment of the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus (20 % of all meniscus injuries). Higher age, advanced Tanner stage, and pubescence were significantly associated with an accompanying meniscal injury. CONCLUSION: Meniscal injuries in children and adolescents undergoing surgical treatment for tibial eminence fractures must be expected in almost 40 %, with a higher prevalence with increasing age and sexual maturity. With regard to the clinical relevance, the results of the present study argue in favor for magnetic resonance imaging prior to surgery in every patient with a suspected tibial eminence fracture and for an arthroscopic approach to adequately diagnose and treat meniscal injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Health-related quality of life after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy.

PURPOSE: (1) To monitor longitudinal changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL), pain, knee function, and return to work (RtW) following high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA), and (2) to investigate the influences of psychopathological comorbidities on preoperative impairment and post-operative course. METHODS: Sixty-four patients were prospectively followed for 24 months after HTO to determine HRQOL, pain, functional outcome, and RtW. Psychopathological comorbidities (e.g. depression) were determined preoperatively. Patients with no psychological distress (ND) were compared to patients with psychological distress (PD) in order to investigate the influence of psychopathological comorbidities on outcome. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in HRQOL and decrease in pain from 6 month follow-up on. Functional outcomes increased significantly from 12 month follow-up on. In general, there was a steady state of outcomes from 6- to 12-month follow-up on. At final follow-up, 90 % returned to their previous occupation without limitations. Mental component summary (MCS) and functional outcome showed a positive correlation with RtW, while depression had a negative one. A significantly inferior outcome of group PD versus ND was observed at baseline and early follow-up. RtW was significantly prolonged in group PD (8.9 ± 7.6 vs. 3.9 ± 3 months; p < 0.001). At final follow-up, both groups presented with comparable outcomes. CONCLUSION: HTO for medial compartment OA significantly improves HRQOL, pain, and knee function. Time to RtW is high and critically depends on PD. Further, extend of preoperative impairments, an initially inferior course, and inferior MCS outcome was influenced by PD. However, otherwise no significant differences were observed between groups PD and ND at final follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective case series, II.

A multicenter study to evaluate subscapularis muscle function using 5:30 o'clock portal for antero-inferior shoulder stabilization.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome after arthroscopic antero-inferior shoulder stabilization with and without using a 5:30 o'clock portal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-two patients [age (mean ± SD), 28.05 ± 8.25 years] with a mean follow-up of 15.23 ± 5.02 months were included in this study. Thirty-one patients underwent arthroscopic antero-inferior shoulder stabilization using the 5:30 o'clock portal in center A (group I) and were compared to 31 matched patients managed with the 3 o'clock portal in center B (group II). Physical examination, standard shoulder scores, ultrasound assessment and subscapularis strength measurement were used to evaluate postoperative shoulder function. RESULTS: Good to excellent results were seen in both groups. No significant differences were seen when comparing ASES, Constant and Rowe Score of both groups. Patients of group II achieved a significant higher score in the SST than patients of group I. (p < 0.05) Patients of group I had a significantly lesser loss of passive external rotation in 0° and 90° of abduction. (p = 0.04; p = 0.056) Ultrasound evaluation and strength measurement showed no significant differences in subscapularis muscle integrity or function neither between the involved and uninvolved shoulder nor between both groups. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic anterior-inferior shoulder stabilization results in excellent clinical results. When considering portal placement, the deep trans-subscapularis portal allows a more precise suture anchor placement at the inferior glenoid rim and capsular shift with a significant improved external rotation but does not negatively affect the subscapularis function in terms of internal rotation strength or structural integrity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Effect of three remplissage techniques on tendon coverage and shoulder kinematics: a navigated robotic biomechanical study.

BACKGROUND: In addition to Bankart repair engaging Hill-Sachs defects in glenohumeral instability have been treated successfully with remplissage procedure. The purpose of this study was to compare three remplissage techniques regarding (I) ability of preventing Hill-Sachs defect from engaging, (II) influence on glenohumeral rotational torque, and (III) resulting tendon coverage over the Hill-Sachs defect. METHODS: Standardized engaging Hill-Sachs defects and Bankart lesions were created in n = 7 fresh frozen human shoulder specimens. Besides Bankart repair three remplissage techniques (T) with double anchor position in the valley of the defect zone were studied: T1, knots tied over anchors; T2, knots tied between anchors (double-pulley); T3, knotless anchors with a suture tape. A parallel position-orientation and force-moment controlled navigated roboticsystem was used to compare prevention of Hill-Sachs defect engagement and torque [Nm]. Pressure sensitive film was used to study area of infraspinatus tendon coverage over Hill-Sachs defect [%]. RESULTS: All remplissage techniques prevented engagement of the Hill-Sachs defect without showing any construct failures. Regarding humeral torque there were significant impairments observed between intact conditions and the three investigated repair techniques in 60° abduction and ≥30° external rotation (p < .04). There was no significant difference in torque between intervention groups (n.s.). With a mean coverage of 26.8 % over the defect zone the knotless suture tape technique (T3) significantly improved area of soft tissue coverage compared to the other techniques (p = .03). CONCLUSION: All remplissage techniques prevented engagement of the Hill Sachs defect. With high abduction and external rotation ≥30° all techniques showed significant higher humeral torque compared to the intact specimens, while there was not one technique superior over the others. The suture tape technique conferred the largest and most effective area of tendon coverage over the Hill-Sachs defect zone. Long-term success of the remplissage procedure can possibly be enhanced by increasing the interface area of tendon coverage over the Hill-Sachs defect. Clinical studies will be necessary to proof potential benefits for clinical outcome.

Can young and active patients participate in sports after osteochondral autologous transfer combined with valgus high tibial osteotomy?

PURPOSE: To evaluate sporting activity following osteochondral autologous transfer (OAT) combined with valgus high tibial osteotomy (HTO) in young and active patients with focal osteochondral defects of the medial femoral condyle and concomitant varus malalignment. METHODS: Thirty patients with focal osteochondral defects of the medial femoral condyle and varus malalignment >2° were enrolled. All patients were active in sports on a regular base prior to surgery (lifetime), but were unable to perform sports at the time of surgery. Sporting activity 1 year preoperatively and at final follow-up was compared using a previously published sports questionnaire, which assesses sports level, number of sports disciplines, sports frequency, sports duration and the participation in 32 common sports disciplines. Additionally, the Tegner activity scale and the Activity Rating Scale were used. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 6.9 years (2.5-9.8; SD 2.4), 76.7 % of patients were participating in sports on a regular basis (Fig. 2). Compared to 1 year preoperatively, there was no difference (n.s.) with regard to sports, the number of sports disciplines, sports frequency and sports duration (Fig. 4). The median Tegner activity scale measured preoperatively 5.0 (2.0-7.0) and post-operatively 5.0 (4.0-7.0) points (Fig. 3), and the ARS changed from 5.7 to 5.3 points (n.s.). The different types of sports disciplines were comparable between 1 year preoperatively and at follow-up. CONCLUSION: A high return to sports rate and an activity level comparable to the state at 1 year preoperatively can be expected in young and active patients after combined OAT and valgus HTO. This seems to be relevant in clinical practice when planning, indicating and performing these complex procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Patient expectations of primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Unrealistic patient expectations have been shown to negatively influence patient-reported outcomes in orthopaedic surgery. Knowledge about patient expectations is important to associate preoperative expectations with the reasonable outcome of a specific procedure. The purpose of this study was to prospectively analyse and to compare patient expectations of primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and to assess the factors associated with patient expectations. METHODS: Preoperative expectations of 181 consecutive patients undergoing ACLR were assessed prospectively using a 5-item questionnaire. Primary ACLR (P-ACLR) was performed in 133 patients (73%), whereas 48 patients (27%) underwent revision ACLR (R-ACLR). The questionnaire assessed the expectation of the overall condition of the knee joint, return to sports, instability, pain, and risk of osteoarthritis. RESULTS: All patients expected a normal (38%) or nearly normal (62%) condition of the knee joint. Return to sports at the same level was expected by 91%. With regard to instability (pain), no instability (pain) independent of the activity level was expected by 77% (58%). No or only a slightly increased risk of the development of osteoarthritis was expected by 98%. The R-ACLR group showed a significantly lower expectation of the overall condition (p = 0.001), return to sports (p < 0.001), and pain (p = 0.002). No statistically significant difference was found between female and male patients (n.s.). In the P-ACLR group, patients with a history of previous knee surgery showed inferior expectations of return to sports (p = 0.015) and risk of osteoarthritis (p = 0.011). Age, number of previous knee surgeries, and pre-injury sports level significantly influenced patient expectations. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, patient expectations of ACL reconstruction are high. Patients undergoing revision ACL reconstruction have lower but still demanding expectations. Younger patients, patients without a history of knee surgery, and highly active patients have higher expectations. Explicit patient information about realistic goals of ACL reconstruction seems to be necessary in order to prevent postoperative dissatisfaction despite a successful operation in the surgeons' point of view. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective case series, Level IV.

Sporting Activity After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Chronic Glenohumeral Instability.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to collect detailed data on postoperative sporting activity after arthroscopic Bankart repair for chronic shoulder instability. METHODS: Of 113 patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair between February 2008 and August 2010, 81 met the inclusion criteria and were surveyed by a specially designed postal sport-specific questionnaire. Of these 81 patients, 66 (82%) were available for evaluation. RESULTS: All previously active patients performed some activity at follow-up. Of 9 patients (56%) who had been inactive, 5 took up new activities postoperatively. Forty-four patients (66%) stated that surgery had (strongly) improved their sporting proficiency. Seventeen patients (26%) reported no impact, and 5 patients (8%) reported a further deterioration compared with preoperatively. The improvement in sporting proficiency was negatively correlated with the preoperative risk level (ρ = 0.42, P < .001), preoperative performance level (ρ = 0.31, P = .012), and preoperative Tegner scale (ρ = 0.36, P = .003), as well as hours of sporting activity per week (ρ = 0.25, P = .042), whereas age showed a positive correlation (ρ = 0.28, P = .023). There was no change in duration, frequency, number of disciplines, Tegner activity scale, risk category, or performance level. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic Bankart repair provides a high rate of return to activity among patients treated for chronic shoulder instability. A number of previously inactive patients returned to activity postoperatively. However, one-third of patients reported no benefit from surgery in terms of sporting activity. The improvement in sporting proficiency was highly dependent on the demands on the shoulder in sports, as well as the age of the patient. Overall, there was no significant increase in duration, frequency, number of disciplines, Tegner activity scale, or performance level between preoperative and follow-up evaluation and no increased return to high-risk activities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Early results after modular non-cemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective single-centre study of 38 consecutive cases.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the outcome of a third generation modular non-cemented reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) in incongruent glenohumeral degeneration with severe rotator cuff deficiency. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight consecutive RTSA with a mean age of 72 years (range 58-89 years) were prospectively enrolled. Mean follow-up was 24 months (range 21-29 months). Pain and standardized clinical functional scores were monitored. Radiographic and MRI findings have been scored and correlated to clinical outcome and complication rate. RESULTS: Preoperative pain decreased significantly from VAS 8 to 2 at 24 months postop., as ROM improved significantly, by at least doubling preoperative values of elevation, abduction, and external rotation. Nevertheless, internal rotation languished. The preoperative median constant was 18 points and 70 points 24 months postop. (p < 0.001). Initial median DASH was 95 vs. 50 2 years after surgery (p < 0.001). Median prospective ASES was 23 (IQR 8-33) vs. 70 points (p < 0.001) at final follow-up. Each outcome measurement improved significantly at 6, 12, and 24 months follow-up. There was no significant correlation between pre-operative radiographic findings of osseous and/or soft-tissue degeneration and short-term clinical outcome and/or complication rate (13 %). At final follow-up, 54 % showed radiographic signs of inferior scapular notching. There was no revision and/or loosening observed. CONCLUSION: RSTA with this modular system results in significant pain relief and improvement of functional clinical outcomes. However, longevity of the device is currently unknown.