Post-resistance exercise hemodynamic and autonomic responses: Comparison between normotensive and hypertensive men.

To compare post-resistance exercise hypotension (PREH) and its mechanisms in normotensive and hypertensive individuals, 14 normotensives and 12 hypertensives underwent two experimental sessions: control (rest) and exercise (seven exercises, three sets, 50% of one repetition maximum). Hemodynamic and autonomic clinic measurements were taken before (Pre) and at two moments post-interventions (Post 1: between 30 and 60 min; Post 2: after 7 h). Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) was monitored for 24 h. At Post 1, exercise decreased systolic BP similarly in normotensives and hypertensives (-8 ± 2 vs -13 ± 2 mmHg, P > 0.05), whereas diastolic BP decreased more in hypertensives (-4 ± 1 vs -9 ± 1 mmHg, P < 0.05). Cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance did not change in normotensives and hypertensives (0.0 ± 0.3 vs 0.0 ± 0.3 L/min; -1 ± 1 vs -2 ± 2 U, P > 0.05). After exercise, heart rate (+13 ± 3 vs +13 ± 2 bpm) and its variability (low- to high-frequency components ratio, 1.9 ± 0.4 vs +1.4 ± 0.3) increased whereas stroke volume (-14 ± 5 vs -11 ± 5 mL) decreased similarly in normotensives and hypertensives (all, P > 0.05). At Post 2, all variables returned to pre-intervention, and ambulatory data were similar between sessions. Thus, a session of resistance exercise promoted PREH in normotensives and hypertensives. Although this PREH was greater in hypertensives, it did not last during the ambulatory period, which limits its clinical relevance. In addition, the mechanisms of PREH were similar in hypertensives and normotensives.

Amlodipine reduces blood pressure during dynamic resistance exercise in hypertensive patients.

This study investigated the effect of the dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist, amlodipine, on blood pressure (BP) during resistance exercise performed at different intensities in hypertensives. Eleven hypertensives underwent 4 weeks of placebo and amlodipine (random double-blinded crossover design). In each phase, they performed knee extension exercise until exhaustion following three protocols: one set at 100% of 1 RM (repetition maximum), three sets at 80% of 1 RM, and three sets at 40% of 1 RM. Intraarterial BP was measured before and during exercise. Amlodipine reduced maximal systolic/diastolic BP values achieved at all intensities (100% = 225 ± 6/141 ± 3 vs. 207 ± 6/130 ± 6 mmHg; 80% = 289 ± 8/178 ± 5 vs. 273 ± 10/169 ± 6 mmHg; 40% = 289 ± 10/176 ± 8 vs. 271 ± 11/154 ± 6 mmHg). Amlodipine blunted the increase in diastolic BP that occurred during the second and third sets of exercise at 40% of 1RM (+75 ± 6 vs. +61 ± 5 mmHg and +78 ± 7 vs. +64 ± 5 mmHg, respectively). Amlodipine was effective in reducing the absolute values of systolic and diastolic BP during resistance exercise and in preventing the progressive increase in diastolic BP that occurs over sets of low-intensity exercise. These results suggest that systemic vascular resistance is involved in BP increase during resistance exercise, and imply that hypertensives receiving amlodipine are at lower risk of increased BP during resistance exercise than non-medicated patients.

Gender influence on post-resistance exercise hypotension and hemodynamics.

Post-resistance exercise hypotension has been extensively described in men and women. However, gender influence on this response has not yet been clear. Gender might change post-exercise hemodynamics, since men and women respond differently during exercise. Thus, the purpose was to compare post-resistance exercise hypotension and its hemodynamic determinants in men and women. Normotensive subjects (22-male, 22-female) underwent 2 sessions: control (40 min of rest) and exercise (6 resistance exercises, 3 sets, 20 repetitions, at 40-50% of 1RM). Blood pressure, heart rate, and cardiac output were measured prior to and following interventions. Blood pressure decrease after exercise was similar between the genders. However, hemodynamic determinants responded differently in men and women. Systemic vascular resistance reduced in women (-4.6±1.9U, P<0.05), while cardiac output decreased in men (-0.6±0.2 L/min, P<0.05). This response was accompanied by a decrease in stroke volume in men (-21.6±5.1 ml, P<0.05) and a more pronounced increase in heart rate in men than in women (+11.3±1.3 vs. +6.5±1.7 bpm, P<0.05, respectively). In conclusion, post-resistance exercise hypotension was similar in men and women. However, its hemodynamic determinants differ between the genders, depending on cardiac output decrease in men and on systemic vascular resistance decrease in women.

Finger blood pressure during leg resistance exercise.

Blood pressure (BP) assessment during resistance exercise can be useful to avoid high BP, reducing cardiovascular risk, especially in hypertensive individuals. However, non-invasive accurate technique for this purpose is not available. The aim of this study was to compare finger photoplethysmographic (FPP) and intra-arterial BP values and responses during resistance exercise. Eight non-medicated hypertensive subjects (5 males, 30-60 years) were evaluated during pre-exercise resting period and during three sets of the knee extension exercise performed at 80% of 1RM until fatigue. BP was measured simultaneously by FPP and intra-arterial methods. Data are mean+/-SD. Systolic BP was significantly higher with FPP than with intra-arterial: at pre-exercise (157+/-13 vs. 152+/-10 mmHg; p<0.01) and the mean (202+/-29 vs. 198+/-26 mmHg; p<0.01), and the maximal (240+/-26 vs. 234+/-16 mmHg; p<0.05) values achieved during exercise. The increase in systolic BP during resistance exercise was similar between FPP and intra-arterial (+73+/-29 vs. +71+/-18 mmHg; p=0.59). Diastolic BP values and increases were lower with FPP. In conclusion, FPP provides similar values of BP increment during resistance exercise than intra-arterial method. However, it overestimates by 2.6+/-6.1% the maximal systolic BP achieved during this mode of exercise and underestimates by 8.8+/-5.8% the maximal diastolic BP.

Antihypertensive efficacy of amlodipine and losartan after two 'missed' doses in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.

We compared the effects of amlodipine (5-10 mg, n=94) and losartan (50-100 mg, n=94) on the lowering of blood pressure (BP) at steady state and after two missed doses, as well as on tolerability. This was a randomized, double-blind study of 12 weeks of active treatment followed by 2 days of placebo treatment. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and office BP measurements were performed at baseline, week 12 and after the 2-day drug holiday. After 12 weeks, amlodipine was significantly more effective than losartan in reducing both 24-h systolic blood pressure (SBP) (-18.0 versus -10.8 mmHg) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (-10.6 versus -8.0 mmHg). While mean SBP and DBP for both treatments increased comparably during the drug holiday, BP values remained significantly lower than baseline for both treatments. The superior BP-lowering effect of amlodipine compared with losartan was maintained during the drug holiday.

Validity of four indirect methods to measure adherence in primary care hypertensives.

High blood pressure (HBP) is one of the most important risk factors for morbidity and mortality in the world. Non-adherence to medication is associated with the lack of control of HBP. The objective of this study was to assess the validity of four indirect methods for measuring adherence to medication to control HBP in primary health care. A random sample of 120 hypertensive patients who were undergoing treatment for at least 2 months in a primary care unit in Florianópolis (Brazil) were included in the study. The independent variables were four indirect methods to measure adherence to medication: knowledge regarding the HBP medication, the blood pressure level, attitude regarding the medication intake (Morisky-Green test) and self-reported adherence. The classification of HBP was based on criteria established by the Brazilian Ministry of Health. The gold standard used for measuring adherence was the pill count. Logistic regression was used to estimate sensitivity (highest value of 88.2% for self-report), specificity (highest value of 70.7% for HBP control), positive predictive value (highest value of 46.4% for HBP control) and negative predictive value (highest value of 79.1% for Morisky-Green test) for each of the indirect methods. No indirect method of measuring adherence had a good positive predictive value for adherence, which was best predicted by patients' age and whether they managed to control HBP. The results also revealed low treatment adherence (31.2%) and low control of HBP (37.6%). Non-adherence was mainly associated with side effects of the treatment.

Post-resistance exercise hypotension, hemodynamics, and heart rate variability: influence of exercise intensity.

UNLABELLED: The occurrence of post-exercise hypotension after resistance exercise is controversial, and its mechanisms are unknown. To evaluate the effect of different resistance exercise intensities on post-exercise blood pressure (BP), and hemodynamic and autonomic mechanisms, 17 normotensives underwent three experimental sessions: control (C-40 min of rest), low- (E40%-40% of 1 repetition maximum, RM), and high-intensity (E80%-80% of 1 RM) resistance exercises. Before and after interventions, BP, heart rate (HR), and cardiac output (CO) were measured. Autonomic regulation was evaluated by normalized low- (LF(R-R)nu) and high-frequency (HF(R-R)nu) components of the R-R variability. In comparison with pre-exercise, systolic BP decreased similarly in the E40% and E80% (-6 +/- 1 and -8 +/- 1 mmHg, P < 0.05). Diastolic BP decreased in the E40%, increased in the C, and did not change in the E80%. CO decreased similarly in all the sessions (-0.4 +/- 0.2 l/min, P < 0.05), while systemic vascular resistance (SVR) increased in the C, did not change in the E40%, and increased in the E80%. Stroke volume decreased, while HR increased after both exercises, and these changes were greater in the E80% (-11 +/- 2 vs. -17 +/- 2 ml/beat, and +17 +/- 2 vs. +21 +/- 2 bpm, P < 0.05). LF(R-R)nu increased, while ln HF(R-R)nu decreased in both exercise sessions. IN CONCLUSION: Low- and high-intensity resistance exercises cause systolic post-exercise hypotension; however, only low-intensity exercise decreases diastolic BP. BP fall is due to CO decrease that is not compensated by SVR increase. BP fall is accompanied by HR increase due to an increase in sympathetic modulation to the heart.

Previous exercise attenuates muscle sympathetic activity and increases blood flow during acute euglycemic hyperinsulinemia.

Insulin infusion causes muscle vasodilation, despite the increase in sympathetic nerve activity. In contrast, a single bout of exercise decreases sympathetic activity and increases muscle blood flow during the postexercise period. We tested the hypothesis that muscle sympathetic activity would be lower and muscle vasodilation would be higher during hyperinsulinemia performed after a single bout of dynamic exercise. Twenty-one healthy young men randomly underwent two hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamps performed after 45 min of seated rest (control) or bicycle exercise (50% of peak oxygen uptake). Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA, microneurography), forearm blood flow (FBF, plethysmography), blood pressure (BP, oscillometric method), and heart rate (HR, ECG) were measured at baseline (90 min after exercise or seated rest) and during hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamps. Baseline glucose and insulin concentrations were similar in the exercise and control sessions. Insulin sensitivity was unchanged by previous exercise. During the clamp, insulin levels increased similarly in both sessions. As expected, insulin infusion increased MSNA, FBF, BP, and HR in both sessions (23 +/- 1 vs. 36 +/- 2 bursts/min, 1.8 +/- 0.1 vs. 2.2 +/- 0.2 ml.min(-1).100 ml(-1), 89 +/- 2 vs. 92 +/- 2 mmHg, and 58 +/- 1 vs. 62 +/- 1 beats/min, respectively, P < 0.05). BP and HR were similar between sessions. However, MSNA was significantly lower (27 +/- 2 vs. 31 +/- 2 bursts/min), and FBF was significantly higher (2.2 +/- 0.2 vs. 1.8 +/- 0.1 ml.min(-1).100 ml(-1), P < 0.05) in the exercise session compared with the control session. In conclusion, in healthy men, a prolonged bout of dynamic exercise decreases MSNA and increases FBF. These effects persist during acute hyperinsulinemia performed after exercise.

Blood pressure behaviour in chronic daily headache.

The objective was to examine the association between high blood pressure (BP) and chronic daily headache using 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitorization (24-h ABPM). This was a cross sectional study in an out-patient clinic. Women were selected among patients referred for first evaluation, 62 with chronic daily headache and 57 without chronic daily headache. The main outcome measures were mean office systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP), mean systolic and diastolic daytime and night-time BP and BP load, and mean systolic and diastolic nocturnal fall. Office systolic BP was 138.2 mmHg for women with chronic daily headache and 141.7 mmHg for women without headache (P = 0.36). Office diastolic BP was 88.9 mmHg for women with headache and 92.7 mmHg for women without headache (P = 0.17). Mean daytime and mean night-time systolic BP was, respectively, 122.2 mmHg and 108.8 mmHg for women with headache and 122.9 mmHg and 109.5 for women without headache (P = 0.82 and P = 0.80, respectively). Mean daytime and mean night-time diastolic BP was, respectively, 78.6 mmHg and 65.4 mmHg for women with headache and 79.9 mmHg and 67.1 mmHg for the women without headache (P = 0.80 and P = 0.45, respectively). There was no difference between the two groups regarding systolic and diastolic BP load and nocturnal systolic and diastolic fall. No significant difference in BP values was observed in women with chronic daily headache compared with women without headache using 24-h ABPM.

Salt supresses baseline muscle sympathetic nerve activity in salt-sensitive and salt-resistant hypertensives.

The objective of our study was to evaluate the role of the baroreflex control of peripheral sympathetic nervous system on the increase of muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) in salt-sensitive (SS) and salt-resistant (SR) hypertensives under low salt diet. In phase I mild-to-moderate hypertensive patients (n=5) received three diet periods: a first regular salt (RS1), a low salt (LS=20 meq Na+/day), followed by a second regular salt diet (RS2) with a 7-day duration of each. At the end of each period, sympathetic and heart rate baroreflex control were recorded. Baseline MSNA varied (P<0.005) from 18+/-8 (RS1) to 32+/-9 (LS) and to 14+/-9 (RS2) bursts per minute (bpm). In phase II additional patients (n=6) were included to have baseline MSNA, sympathetic and heart rate baroreflex control evaluated at the end of the LS and RS2. For all patients (n=11), there was a significant decrease of MSNA from 36+/-4 to 20+/-8 bpm on day 7 of LS to RS2 (P<0.05). The response of MSNA to a salt restriction was similar for SS and SR patients, who showed a change from 32+/-6 to 18+/-11 and from 36+/-9 to 17+/-7 bpm for SS and SR on day 7 of LS and RS2 diets, respectively (P<0.05). MSNA baroreflex gain was similar during phenylephrine infusions at day 7 of LS and RS2 (5.1+/-1.6 and 6.1+/-2.9 bpm/mmHg), but it was reduced under LS during sodium nitroprusside infusion (19.5+/-4.9 vs 8.9+/-0.7 bpm/mmHg) (P<0.05) for the whole group. Baroreflex control of MSNA was also similar during phenylephrine infusions under LS and RS2 diets for SS (4.0+/-0.9 and 3.3+/-0.2 bpm/mmHg) and for SR patients (10.1+/-2.5 and 5.6+/-1.5 bpm/mmHg). During nitroprusside infusion, baroreflex gain was significantly greater under RS2 for SR patients (19.5+/-2.6 bpm/mmHg) when compared to LS (11.2+/-5.2 bpm/mmHg) and the same significant difference was observed among SS patients (14.4+/-4.7 and 9.1+/-3.6 bpm/mmHg under RS2 and LS diets, respectively). There was no difference in heart rate baroreflex gain between LS and RS2 diets. Data support the hypotheses that (1) sodium supresses baseline MSNA in SS and SR hypertensives and (2) sodium restriction may impair baroreflex control of MSNA in SR and SS mild-to-moderate hypertensive patients during blood pressure reductions.

[Treatment of hypertension - answers of Brazilian physicians to a survey]. / Tratamento da hipertensão arterial - respostas de médicos brasileiros a um inquérito.

INTRODUCTION: The third Brazilian Consensus of Hypertension recomends the usage of pharmacological (PT) and non-pharmacological treatment (NPT). In Brazil, we don't know how if this recommedation has been followet by doctors. OBJECTIVES: a) to characterize NPT regarding prescription and acceptability by hypertensive patients; b) characterize PT concerning the criterion used for choosing medication and medication prescribed; and c) identify doctors' opinions about patients' degree of acceptability to PT and NPT. METHODS: 37904 questionnaires with reply-paid envelopes were sent to Brazilian doctors and 2519 of those were replied (57% from the Southeast region, 41% were cardiologists, and 26% clinicians). RESULTS: 1- 62% of doctors recommend NPT to 25% of their patients. 2 - The most recommended NP treatments are: hyposodic diet (55%), weight reduction (29%) and physical exercises (8%), considering that doctors believe that 50% of their patients follow a hyposodic diet, 20% do physical exercises and 19% lose weight. 3 - Only one medication is prescribed at the beginning of a PT (88%) and when blood pressure isn't under control, 55% of the doctors associate other medications with it whereas 33% of them increase the dose. 4 - The most prescribed medications are: diuretics (53%) and ECA inhibitors (24%). 5 - The main criteria for choosing medication are: personal experience (32%) and characteristics of patients (31%). 6 - Doctors (60%) believe that acceptability to PT is better. CONCLUSION: The recommendations of the Third Brazilian Consensus of Hypertension have been followed partially concerning NPT and as expected regarding PT.

The effect of siesta in parameters of cardiac structure and in interpretation of ambulatory arterial blood pressure monitoring.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of the siesta in ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring and in cardiac structure parameters. METHODS: 1940 ambulatory arterial blood pressure monitoring tests were analyzed (Spacelabs 90207, 15/15 minutes from 7:00 to 22:00 hours and 20/20 minutes from 22:01 to 6.59hours) and 21% of the records indicated that the person had taken a siesta (263 woman, 52+/-14 years). The average duration of the siesta was 118+/-58 minutes. RESULTS: (average +/- standard deviation) The average of systolic/diastolic pressures during wakefulness, including the napping period, was less than the average for the period not including the siesta (138+/-16/85+/-11 vs 139+/-16/86+/-11 mmHg, p<0. 05); 2) pressure loads during wakefulness including the siesta, were less than those observed without the siesta); 3) the averages of nocturnal sleep blood pressures were similar to those of the siesta, 4) nocturnal sleep pressure drops were similar to those in the siesta including wakefulness with and without the siesta; 5) the averages of BP in men were higher (p<0.05) during wakefulness with and without the siesta, during the siesta and nocturnal sleep in relation to the average obtained in women; 6) patients with a reduction of 0- 5% during the siesta had thickening of the interventricular septum and a larger posterior wall than those with a reduction during the siesta >5%. CONCLUSION: The siesta influenced the heart structure parameters and from a statistical point of view the average of systolic and diastolic pressures and the respective pressure loads of the wakeful period.

The results of the campaign for evaluating sphygmomanometers accuracy and their physical conditions

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sphygmomanometers calibration accuracy and the physical conditions of the cuff-bladder, bulb, pump, and valve. METHODS: Sixty hundred and forty five aneroid sphygmomanometers were evaluated, 521 used in private practice and 124 used in hospitals. Aneroid manometers were tested against a properly calibrated mercury manometer and were considered calibrated when the error was < or = 3 mm Hg. The physical conditions of the cuffs-bladder, bulb, pump, and valve were also evaluated. RESULTS: Of the aneroid sphygmomanometers tested, 51% of those used in private practice and 56% of those used in hospitals were found to be not accurately calibrated. Of these, the magnitude of inaccuracy ranged from 4 to 8 mm Hg in 70% and 51% of the devices, respectively. The problems found in the cuffs--bladders, bulbs, pumps, and valves of the private practice and hospital devices were bladder damage (34% vs. 21%, respectively), holes/leaks in the bulbs (22% vs. 4%, respectively), and rubber aging (15% vs. 12%, respectively). Of the devices tested, 72% revealed at least one problem interfering with blood pressure measurement accuracy. CONCLUSION: Most of the manometers evaluated, whether used in private practice or in hospitals, were found to be inaccurate and unreliable, and their use may jeopardize the diagnosis and treatment of arterial hypertension.

The results of the Campaign for evaluating sphygmomanometers accuracy and their physical conditions.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sphygmomanometers calibration accuracy and the physical conditions of the cuff-bladder, bulb, pump, and valve. METHODS: Sixty hundred and forty five aneroid sphygmomanometers were evaluated, 521 used in private practice and 124 used in hospitals. Aneroid manometers were tested against a properly calibrated mercury manometer and were considered calibrated when the error was

Factors affecting post-exercise hypotension in normotensive and hypertensive humans.

BACKGROUND: Post-exercise hypotension has been extensively described under laboratory conditions. However, studies investigating the persistence of this post-exercise decrease in blood pressure for longer periods have produced controversial results. The present investigation was conducted to verify the effect of a single bout of exercise on ambulatory blood pressure and to identify potential factors that might influence this post-exercise ambulatory blood pressure fall. DESIGN: The study was a randomized controlled clinical trial. METHODS: Thirty normotensive and 23 hypertensive subjects were submitted to two ambulatory blood pressure monitorings (using the SpaceLabs 90207, SpaceLabs, Redmond, Washington, USA), which were performed after 45min of seated rest (control session) or cycling exercise at 50% peak oxygen uptake (exercise session). RESULTS: Normotensive subjects demonstrated a lower 24h blood pressure level in the exercise session. Hypertensive patients showed no significant difference in ambulatory blood pressure level between the two experimental sessions. Further data analysis revealed that approximately 65% of the subjects in both groups experienced a fall in blood pressure after exercise. Moreover, in the normotensive subjects, this blood pressure fall was significantly and positively correlated with clinic and ambulatory blood pressure, and negatively correlated with weight and body mass index. The blood pressure response to exercise was also greater in women. In the hypertensive patients, the post-exercise blood pressure decrease was significantly and positively correlated with clinic and ambulatory blood pressure as well as with the peak oxygen uptake, and negatively correlated with age and body mass index. CONCLUSIONS: The post-exercise ambulatory blood pressure fall observed in normotensive and hypertensive humans depends on individual characteristics. Moreover, in both normotensive and hypertensive humans, post-exercise ambulatory hypotension is greater in subjects with a higher initial blood pressure level.

Population studies of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in Brazilian children.

BACKGROUND: The determination of hypertension in a given population depends on the knowledge of population norms for blood pressure. This is true for both casual blood pressure (CBP) measurements and the newest and most promising technology of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). OBJECTIVE: To design an ambitious multinational co-operative study to determine normal blood pressure data in Brazilian children. METHODS: The study was designed to determine normative data for CBP, using the Task Force technical recommendations for age-, sex- and height-percentile-specific blood pressure values. The proposed procedure is as follows. ABPM will be studied in a random subgroup of individuals, to develop similar normative data. These data will be correlated to CBP measurements and to echocardiographic findings as a measure of end-organ damage. All patients who are diagnosed by CBP measurement to be hypertensive will also be studied by ABPM, and studies of target-organ damage will be performed. Family and medical histories will be evaluated by questionnaire and first-degree relatives will be evaluated for CBP measurement. Hypertensive patients will form a cohort for long-term follow-up. These data will be the foundation for studies of hypertension in Brazilian children.

How accurate are sphygmomanometers?

The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy and reliability of mercury and aneroid sphygmomanometers. Measurement of accuracy of calibration and evaluation of physical conditions were carried out in 524 sphygmomanometers, 351 from a hospital setting, and 173 from private medical offices. Mercury sphygmomanometers were considered inaccurate if the meniscus was not '0' at rest. Aneroid sphygmomanometers were tested against a properly calibrated mercury manometer, and were considered calibrated when the error was < or =3 mm Hg. Both types of sphygmomanometers were evaluated for conditions of cuff/bladder, bulb, pump and valve. Of the mercury sphygmomanometers tested 21 % were found to be inaccurate. Of this group, unreliability was noted due to: excessive bouncing (14%), illegibility of the gauge (7%), blockage of the filter (6%), and lack of mercury in the reservoir (3%). Bladder damage was noted in 10% of the hospital devices and in 6% of private medical practices. Rubber aging occurred in 34% and 25%, leaks/holes in 19% and 18%, and leaks in the pump bulb in 16% and 30% of hospital devices and private practice devices, respectively. Of the aneroid sphygmomanometers tested, 44% in the hospital setting and 61% in private medical practices were found to be inaccurate. Of these, the magnitude of inaccuracy was 4-6 mm Hg in 32%, 7-12 mm Hg in 19% and > 13 mm Hg in 7%. In summary, most of the mercury and aneroid sphygmomanometers showed inaccuracy (21% vs 58%) and unreliability (64% vs 70%).

[Efficacy and tolerance of the bisoprolol/hydrochlorothiazide combination in arterial hypertension]. / Eficácia e tolerabilidade da associação bisoprolol/ hidroclorotiazida na hipertensão arterial.

PURPOSE: Multicenter, open and non-controlled study to evaluated the efficacy and the tolerability of a low-dose combination of two anti-hypertensive agents: a cardioselective beta-blocker, bisoprolol (2.5 and 5.0 mg) with 6.25 mg of hydrochlorothiazide. METHODS: One hundred and six patients in the stage I and stage II of the systemic hypertension (mild to moderate) were given the bisoprolol/hydrochlorothiazide combination once daily and the diastolic and systolic blood pressures were monitored during the 8-week trial. RESULTS: The bisoprolol/hydrochlorothiazide combination reduced the initial mean values of systolic and diastolic blood pressures, respectively, from the 157.4 mmHg and 98.8 mmHg to 137.3 mmHg and 87.4 mmHg. At the end of the treatment period, 61% of the patients normalized blood pressure values (< 90 mmHg) and 22.9% of them had responded to the treatment, resulting in a total response rate (normalized + responsive) of 83.9% of cases. Adverse events were described only in 18.9% of the patients and dizziness and headache were the most common. There were no clinically significant changes on plasma levels of potassium, uric acid, glucose, or in the lipid profile. CONCLUSION: The combination of low dosages of bisoprolol and hydrochlorothiazide may be considered an effective, well tolerated and rational alternative for the initial treatment of the patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

Baroreflex control of muscle sympathetic nerve activity in mild hypertension.

The importance of the arterial baroreflex control of muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) has been investigated in physiological conditions and in cardiovascular dysfunctions. However, there is no consensus about the role played by the MSNA in hypertensive states, probably due to the diversity of the methods used to study the arterial baroreflex control of MSNA. In the present study we evaluated the reflex changes in MSNA by increasing and decreasing the mean arterial pressure (MAP) through 1 min intravenous infusion of phenylephrine (1 microgram/kg) and sodium nitroprusside (1 microgram/kg), respectively, in eight normotensive and eight mild hypertensive subjects. Both MAP and MSNA were significantly higher in hypertensive (117 +/- 2 mm Hg and 30 +/- 3 bursts/min) than in normotensive (96 +/- 4 mm Hg and 20 +/- 3 bursts/min) subjects. The reflex gain was calculated by the ratio percent of changes in MSNA/percent changes in MAP. The maximal reflex gain was statistically similar in normotensive and hypertensive groups during phenylephrine (5.1 +/- .4 v 4.3 +/- 0.4 bursts/mm Hg, respectively) and nitroprusside (10.7 +/- 2.3 v 8.1 +/- 1.3 bursts/mm Hg, respectively) infusion. The present data showing that arterial baroreflex control of MSNA is not depressed in hypertensive subjects indicate that the elevated basal MSNA and the mild hypertension in human beings is not a consequence of baroreflex control of MSNA dysfunction.