Prognostic role of serum CA15.3 in 362 node-negative breast cancers. An old player for a new game.

The aims of the present investigation were to evaluate the association between serum CA15.3 levels and other biological and clinical variables and its prognostic role in patients with node-negative breast cancer. We evaluated 362 patients operated upon primary breast cancer from 1982 to 1992 (median follow-up 69 months). Serum CA15.3 was measured by an immunoradiometric assay. The association between variables was investigated by a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and the prognostic role of CA15.3 on relapse-free survival (RFS) was investigated by Cox regression models adjusting for age, oestrogen receptor (ER), tumour stage, and ER x age interaction, with both the likelihood ratio test and Harrell's c statistic. The prognostic contribution of CA 15.3 was highly significant. Log relative hazard of relapse was constant until approximately 10 (U/ml) of CA15.3 and increased thereafter with increasing marker levels. CA15.3 showed a significant contribution using as a cut-off point a value of 31 U/ml. However, the contribution to the model of the marker as a continuous variable is much greater. From these findings, we can conclude that: (i) CA15.3 is a prognostic marker in node-negative breast cancer; (ii) its relationship with prognosis is continuous, with the risk of relapse increasing progressively from approximately 10 U/ml.

Tumor markers in breast cancer monitoring should be scheduled according to initial stage and follow-up time: a prospective study on 859 patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify and standardize optimal decision criteria for maximizing the effectiveness of tumor markers in clinical use during the follow-up of patients operated on for breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was prospectively performed on 859 patients enrolled in 10 institutions. A total of 13,337 determinations of CEA and 14,330 determinations of CA15.3 were available. The median number of samples per patient was 16 for CEA and 17 for CA15.3. The median follow-up was 7 years. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was used to evaluate the ability of CEA and CA15.3 to discriminate relapses from patients who had no evidence of disease. The diagnostic performances of the two markers were evaluated using decision criteria based on both dichotomic cut-off points and dynamic variations among serial samples. RESULTS: We selected decision levels corresponding to preset levels of 90% and 99% specificity. Patients with CEA and/or CA15.3 levels above the cut-off values were considered positive only if a 1.5-fold increase occurred among the last sample and the mean of the first three samples. According to the different cut-offs used, specificity ranged from 94% to 99% and sensitivity from 48% to 63%. We calculated predictive values using the prevalence expected with reference to the stage of primary tumor and the length of follow-up. Positive predictive values ranged from 1.6% to 93.7%, and negative predictive values from 88.9% to 100%, according to the clinical scenarios and the decision criteria used. The choice of the decision criteria significantly affected positive predictive values within each patient subset. Differences related to time from surgery were still remarkable for every decision criteria (i.e., positive predictive values ranged from 36.6% to 2.8% in node-negative patients according to the year of observation, although the same cut-off point was used). DISCUSSION: The results of the present prospective study show that different decision criteria may provide different diagnostic performances for the same tumor marker and in the same patient. Therefore, we suggest that different decision criteria be settled and used according to the clinical goals.

CA27.29: a valuable marker for breast cancer management. A confirmatory multicentric study on 603 cases.

Recently, a fully automated method has become commercially available to measure the MUC-1-associated antigen CA27.29. The present investigation was performed in order to compare CA27.29 and CA15.3 in a wide series of patients affected with breast cancer. Overall, 603 cases with breast cancer and 194 healthy controls were investigated. Patients were enrolled in 4 institutions, while assays were performed in one laboratory. CA27.29 was measured by the ACS:180 BR assay (Bayer Diagnostics) and CA15.3 by the AxSYM (Abbott Laboratories). An excellent correlation was found between the results obtained by the two methods. The two markers showed comparable results in healthy controls, with higher levels in post-menopausal than in pre-menopausal subjects. The markers were significantly higher in primary breast cancer than in controls. The areas under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves of the two tests were comparable, but CA27.29 showed better sensitivity in cases with low antigen concentrations (below the cut-off point). Accordingly, when comparing each test in different stage categories, significance levels of the differences were higher for CA27.29 than for CA15.3 for all T categories versus healthy controls, for pT1 versus pT2, for all N categories versus healthy controls and for node-negative versus N1-3 patients. From the results of the present study, that has been performed on samples taken at diagnosis and prior to any treatment from the widest series of patients with primary breast cancer reported so far, we can draw the following conclusions: CA27.29 provides comparable results to CA15.3; CA27.29 seems more sensitive than CA15.3 to limited variations of tumour extension; however, it cannot help clinicians in distinguishing stage I patients from stage II patients. However, from the point of view of clinical decision making, CA27.29 provides comparable results to CA15.3. CA27.29 is therefore suitable for routine use in the management of patients with breast cancer.

Clinical evaluation of percent free prostate-specific antigen using the AxSYM system in the best analytical scenario.

OBJECTIVE: Percent free prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a promising tool for prostate cancer (CaP) diagnosis. However, its diagnostic performances have not yet been established. The present study was carried out with the aim of evaluating percent free PSA in the most favourable analytical conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-eight patients affected by newly diagnosed, untreated, primary CaP, and 169 cases with biopsy-confirmed, untreated, benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) were prospectively enrolled. Abbott AxSYM total and free PSA were measured by the same technician using the same instrument and the same reagent batch. RESULTS: Percent free PSA was more effective than total PSA in differential diagnosis between CaP and BPH in every evaluated dose range of total PSA. In cases with total PSA >4 microg/l, percent free PSA could have reduced by about 50% the rate of unnecessary biopsies with a probably still acceptable 93% cancer detection rate. The likelihood of CaP after the determination of percent free PSA was in fact higher than 50% using cut-off points which provide low sensitivity values (i.e. 58% in men aged 50-59 years). CONCLUSIONS: Percent free PSA is superior to total PSA in distinguishing primary CaP from BPH in patients with total PSA between 2 and 30 microg/l and in reducing the rate of unnecessary biopsies in men with total PSA higher than 4 microg/l. However, percent free PSA should be cautiously interpreted in decision making in individual patients since post-test probability is relatively low in men aged 50-70 years.

Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of CA27.29 and CA15.3 in primary breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: A new, fully automated method that measures the breast cancer-associated glycoprotein CA27.29 has become commercially available. The aim of the present study was to compare this CA27.29 assay with the assay that measures CA15.3 in primary breast cancer. METHODS: The study was performed retrospectively on preoperative serum samples collected from 275 patients with untreated primary breast cancer (154 node positive and 121 node negative). Eighty-three healthy control subjects were also evaluated. CA27.29 was measured using the fully automated Chiron Diagnostics immunochemiluminescent system (ACS:180 BR). CA15.3 was measured with a manual immunoradiometric method (Centocor CA15.3 RIA). RESULTS: In healthy subjects, CA15.3 was significantly higher than CA27.29 (P <0. 0001). On the other hand, in breast cancer patients CA27.29 was higher than CA15.3 (P = 0.013). The mean value found in the control group plus 2 SD was chosen as the positive/negative cutoff point. The overall positivity rates were 34.9% for CA27.29 and 22.5% for CA15.3. The area under the ROC curve was greater (P <0.001) for CA27. 29 (0.72) than for CA15.3 (0.61). Both markers showed a statistically significant, direct relationship, with pathological stage being higher in node-positive than in node-negative cases and in larger than in smaller tumors. Neither CA27.29 nor CA15.3 showed significant associations with age, menopausal status, or tumor receptor status. CONCLUSIONS: CA27.29 discriminates primary breast cancer from healthy subjects better than CA15.3, especially in patients with limited disease. Prospective studies are necessary to confirm this conclusion.

Percent free prostate-specific antigen in assessing the probability of prostate cancer under optimal analytical conditions.

Although general consensus exists that percent free prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is superior to total immunoreactive PSA for prostate cancer (CaP) detection, its diagnostic performance is not yet well established. Analytical problems may account for difficulties in evaluating percent free PSA because the free PSA concentration is substantially lower than that of total PSA. The aim of the present study was to establish the diagnostic performances of the IMMULITE percent free PSA assay from Diagnostics Products Corp. under experimental conditions optimized to minimize analytical variability. Eighty-five patients with untreated primary CaP and 261 with untreated benign prostate hypertrophy (BPH) were prospectively enrolled. The Diagnostics Products IMMULITE total (Third Generation) and free PSA were measured by the same technician, using the same instrument and the same reagent batch. We calculated the post-test probability to express how the likelihood of the diagnosis of CaP changed after the percent free PSA was determined. Areas under the ROC curves of percent free PSA were better than those of total PSA in every evaluated range of total PSA. The percent free PSA could have reduced the rate of unnecessary biopsies by 47% in patients with total PSA >/=4 microg/L with only 3.8% false-negative results. The post-test probability of percent free PSA was, however, <50% in men 50-70 years of age, using cutoff points providing sensitivity from 99% to 80%. Percent free PSA is superior to total PSA in distinguishing primary CaP from BPH in patients with total PSA between 2 and 30 microg/L. In men with low total PSA, the diagnostic performance of the percent free PSA assay may be optimized by controlling methodological variability. The percent free PSA assay is effective in reducing the rate of unnecessary biopsies in men with total PSA >4 microg/L. However, the post-test probability provided by percent free PSA is relatively low in asymptomatic patients 50-70 years of age.

Prostate cancer probability after total PSA and percent free PSA determination.

UNLABELLED: The percent free PSA value is a promising diagnostic tool for prostate cancer. However, its actual role has not yet been established because of the widely diverging sensitivity and specificity values. This could depend at least in part on analytical difficulties, since the free PSA concentration is much lower than that of total PSA. The present investigation was designed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the percent free PSA in the most favorable analytical conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 81 patients affected by newly diagnosed, untreated primary prostate cancer (CaP) and 239 patients with untreated benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were prospectively enrolled. Hybritech total and free PSA were measured by the same technician using the same reagent batch. RESULTS: The percent free PSA was not significantly associated with age, tumor stage, gland volume, Gleason score, and total PSA, nor was it significantly affected by concomitant prostatic complications either in CaP or BPH. Percent free PSA was more effective than total PSA in the differential diagnosis between CaP and BPH in every evaluated dose range of total PSA. Percent free PSA determination could have reduced the rate of unnecessary biopsies in cases with total PSA > or = 4 ng/mL and > or = 10 ng/mL (avoided biopsies 61% and 63%, respectively). The post-test probability of the disease, which represents the proportion of patients with a positive percent free PSA value who have the disease, was, however, relatively low in younger patients with total PSA within the normal range. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic performance of the percent free PSA value is enhanced when the methodological variability is reduced, particularly in men with low total PSA. Percent free PSA is superior to total PSA in distinguishing primary CaP from BPH in patients with total PSA between 2 and 30 ng/mL. The percent free PSA value is effective in reducing the rate of unnecessary biopsies in men with total PSA higher than 4 or 10 ng/mL. However, due to its relatively low post-test probability, the percent free PSA value should be interpreted with caution in the decision-making related to individual patients and should be used in association with clinical and instrumental evaluation of the patient.

Impact of steroid receptors, pS2 and cathepsin D on the outcome of N+ postmenopausal breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen.

In spite of the complexity of the biological basis of the hormonal regulation of breast cancer, clinical studies tend to simplify the information by mainly categorizing continuous variables related to hormonal status and not considering the interactions between variables. The present study was planned to examine the presence of an interaction between cathepsin D (Cath-D) and pS2 in patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen in a homogeneous subset of node-positive postmenopausal patients and to evaluate the contribution of the interaction to the predictive ability of the model. Steroid receptors (ER and PgR) were measured in cytosol using the dextran-coated charcoal method, while Cath-D and pS2 were determined using commercially available immunoradiometric assays. The prognostic role of each variable and their joint effect were investigated using a Cox regression model. Biological variables were analyzed as continuous and when their prognostic relationship did not seem linear, a restricted cubic spline regression smoothing approach was adopted. The logarithm of hazard showed a linear relationship with the log(ER), while it i) remained almost constant up to about 20 fmol/mg and subsequently decreased for PgR; ii) was almost constant up to about 50 pmol/mg and subsequently decreased for Cath-D; iii) decreased for increasing log(value) up to about 33 ng/mg and subsequently increased for pS2. In the multivariate analysis both PgR and the interaction between pS2 and Cath-D retained a significant prognostic role. For low values of pS2, the prognosis worsened with the increase in Cath-D levels and this relationship reversed for high values of pS2. From the results of the present study we can conclude that i) a significant interaction between Cath-D and pS2 was found in this case series; ii) the prognostic relationship should not be underestimated in clinical decision making; iii) a predictive score obtained considering the contribution of PgR, pS2 and Cath-D could be useful for clinical use.

How CA 125 is used in the routine follow-up of ovarian cancer: a survey of 29 Italian hospitals.

Tumor markers are currently monitored on a routine basis. However, their impact on the course of a disease is still under debate. This relative uncertainty leads to a subjective approach to their use. In order to evaluate the range in the pattern of tumor marker application we carried out a survey on the follow-up of patients with ovarian, breast, and colorectal carcinomas. This report concerns only ovarian cancer. Preliminary results showed that the number of markers used, the cutoff point and, probably of major importance, the management of patients with positive tumor marker vary considerably. When evaluating the institutional setting of the surveyed hospitals, a relatively poor interaction between clinicians and the laboratory staff was found. Actually, in about half of the investigated centers, clinical information is not provided to the laboratory staff and methodological aspects are not reported to clinicians, too. The first step to increase the effectiveness of tumor markers is to improve cooperation between persons assaying the markers and those using them. This is a mandatory task in order to both enable the application of recommendations provided by guidelines and to provide the means to verify their rate of acceptance.

How tumor markers are used in the routine follow-up of breast and colorectal cancer. A survey of 29 Italian hospitals.

The impact of tumor markers on the outcome of several malignancies is still under debate. This relative uncertainty leads to a subjective approach to their use. Monitoring the use of tumor markers is a valuable tool to identify the need for educational policies. We conducted a survey to evaluate how tumor markers are routinely used in the follow-up of patients with breast, colorectal and ovarian carcinoma. The former two malignancies are considered in the present paper. We surveyed 35 Italian hospitals; 29 (83%, accounting for 26,622 hospital beds) filled in and returned the questionnaire. Overall, 467,361 tumor marker requests were scrutinized by the surveyed hospitals. We found a wide variability in the type and number of routinely used markers, the cutoff points chosen, and the clinical decisions taken on the basis of marker results. In addition, we observed a relative lack of communication between clinicians and clinical pathologists in around 50% of the surveyed hospitals. In these cases clinical information was not provided to the laboratory and methodological aspects were not communicated to clinicians. From the findings of the present study we conclude that the cooperation between clinicians and clinical pathologists must improve before guidelines for the use of tumor marker assays can be framed and the compliance with these guidelines can be checked. Request forms for tumor marker assays should therefore be designed to contain clinical information and the quality of filling in request forms with clinical data should be carefully monitored.

Quantitative chemiluminescent immunoassay of p53: prognostic significance in 220 node-negative breast cancer tissue.

The prognostic and predictive role of p53 overexpression in breast cancer samples is usually investigated by using molecular biology or immunohistochemical methods. However, the results are to date controversial, and this is in part due to the methodological pitfalls of both the methods. To study the possibility of overcoming, at least in part, these problems we evaluated a commercially available chemiluminescent immunoassay with which the p53 concentrations of 220 specimens from node negative breast cancer were determined. The assay showed good analytical performance and found detectable levels in 84.7% of cases (median 0.22 ng/mg of proteins, range 0-50 ng/mg of proteins). p53 has been found inversely correlated with estrogen receptors and directly correlated with cathepsin D. The prognostic role of p53 was evaluated in two different ways: a) two previous studies (Borg et al 1995, DeWitte et al. 1996) using the same method found almost 30% of samples had significantly shorter DFS and OS. We subdivided our cases in order to identify the same positivity rate and to verify if the previous cathegorizations were effective also in our patient series. We confirmed the independent association with DFS (p = 0.006) and OS (p = 0.0005); b) considering that any categorization of quantitative parameters could cause a loss of clinical information, we also evaluated p53 as a continuous variable. Multivariate analysis showed a significant quantitative relationship between p53 and both disease free (p = 0.026) and overall survival (p = 0.02).

Preliminary results of clinical evaluation of the free/total prostate-specific antigen ratio in a multicentric study.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: The free/total (F/T) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ratio is probably the most promising tool proposed to increase the specificity of PSA in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical value of the F/T ratio in 138 patients with benign hyperplasia, 101 with untreated prostate cancer, and 176 apparently healthy men. METHODS: We used a new immunometric assay of free PSA (FPSA-RIACT, CIS Diagnostici, Italy) which has shown good analytical performance; sample handling and storage under routine conditions did not affect the antigen stability. RESULTS: The diagnostic efficiency of the F/T ratio was significantly better than that of total PSA. In patients with total PSA ranging from 4 to 10 ng/ml, at a specificity level of 95% total PSA showed a sensitivity of 7%, whereas the sensitivity of F/T increased to 70%. Using the F/T ratio as a decision tool in association with total PSA and considering all cases candidate to biopsy (total PSA greater than 3.79 ng/ml corresponding to the 95% level), we demonstrated a 35% reduction of total biopsies that would have been required on the basis of total PSA alone. CONCLUSIONS: The determination of the percentage of F/T serum PSA significantly improves the specificity of the marker, particularly in the 4-10 ng/ml dose range where unnecessary prostate biopsies can be reduced.

Standardization of assay for cytokeratin-related tumor marker CYFRA21.1 in urine samples.

The determination of tumor markers in urine samples has been proposed as an effective diagnostic tool in bladder cancer. The aim of the present investigation was to validate in urine samples the assay of the CYFRA21.1 cytokeratin-related marker, the serum concentrations of which showed promising diagnostic utility in patients with bladder cancer. First-voided urine samples were collected from patients with different malignancies. CYFRA21.1 was assayed with a commercially available enzyme immunoassay (Boehringer Mannheim). Different centrifugation patterns, the use of different buffers and nonionic detergents, and pH variations were evaluated. We demonstrated that: (a) cells and cell debris contain a large amount of CYFRA21.1 and must be eliminated by centrifugation; (b) storage at -20 degrees C causes amorphous precipitate, which may aspecifically bind CYFRA21.1; (c) the latter behavior may be prevented by diluting fresh urine samples with phosphate buffer with nonionic detergent added; (d) pH variations within the range 4.9-8.2 do not significantly affect CYFRA21.1 assay results. Provided that samples are diluted with buffer containing nonionic detergent, the CYFRA21.1 assay showed good precision and accuracy characteristic in urine samples. We therefore propose a standard protocol for the collection of urine samples for CYFRA21.1 assay. In a preliminary clinical evaluation, CYFRA21.1 concentrations in 16 patients with primary bladder cancer were higher than in healthy subjects. In the urine collected in the follow-up of patients treated for bladder cancer, CYFRA21.1 tended to be higher in relapsed patients than in those without evidence of disease. These preliminary data induced us to extend the clinical trial to establish the actual role of this assay in routine use.

Cathepsin D versus other prognostic factors in breast cancer. Results and controversies of a multicenter study on 2575 cases.

The aim of this study was the survey of cathepsin D determination in a large group of patients enrolled at several centers, under the coordination of the Italian Committee for Quality Control in the Oncological Laboratory. Cathepsin D was measured with the same methodology, under control of an intra and interlaboratory quality control program, in order to verify the comparability of cathepsin D results from different institutions and to analyze the frequency of cathepsin D positive cases in subgroups of patients stratified according to other prognostic parameters. This retrospective study included 2575 patients with primary breast cancer evaluated in 10 institutions. Cytosol from tumor tissue was the substrate for biochemical cathepsin D, estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor determination, with an interlaboratory quality control survey provided by the E.O.R.T.C. Receptor Group and the Italian Committee for Quality Control in the Oncological Laboratory. The results of the present study can be summarized as follows: 1) Cathepsin D is independent of menopausal status; 2) In spite of standardization of tissue handling and assay methods, different results may be obtained by different institutions. It is therefore essential that each laboratory calculates its own positive/negative cutoff values prior to any routine clinical use of the parameter. This should be a serious consideration when a multicenter study is planned.

Dynamic use of tumor markers, rationale-clinical applications and pitfalls.

The dynamic evaluation of tumor markers is a promising area of investigation which is expected to provide clinical information when serial samples are available from the same patient. This is feasible in the post-operatory evaluation, during the follow-up after the treatment for to the primary tumor and in the monitoring of the treatment for metastatic disease. Variations among serial samples may be assessed using both empirical and mathematical approaches. Empirical approaches rely on overcoming a given percentage usually chosen on the base of arbitrary decisions. Mathematical approaches include the actual half-life, the doubling time, a dose/time regression analysis and the calculation of the critical difference. The two former are currently used in clinical practice whereas the two latter are still matter of investigation. As concerns the assessment of the radicality of the surgery for the primary tumor, the serum markers are used in germ cell tumors and in prostate cancer. The half-life of the markers is the decision criteria used in germ cell cancers, while in prostate cancer PSA is expected to be undetectable more than 30 days after the radical prostatectomy. Tumor markers are currently used during the follow-up of several malignancies after the treatment for primary tumor. Although several samples are available, decision criteria are still based on positive/negative cut-off values in several instances. Promising dynamic approaches are under investigation and are expected to lead to earlier and probably more accurate information concerning the disease progression. A critical point still under debate is the actual impact of tumor markers on patients' survival in malignancies incurable when metastatic, such as colorectal cancer and breast cancer. This matter urgently demands perspective clinical studies. Finally, the dynamic use of tumor markers is now commonly applied in the monitoring of the therapy for metastatic malignancies. In this clinical setting mathematical criteria are used for ovarian and and germ cell tumors with promising results. Nevertheless, the use of empirical criteria, namely the percentage of variation between two consecutive samples, is successfully used for the monitoring of the therapy of metastatic breast cancer. In conclusion, when several samples are available from an individual patient they may be evaluated according to dynamic criteria instead of referring to a conventional positive/negative cut-off point. Although mathematical decision criteria are expected to provide more reliable data, empirical approaches are used as well and provide useful information in decision making.

Third-generation PSA: ultrasensitive or ultraprecise assay?

The ultrasensitive PSA assay has been recently acknowledged as a useful tool for the monitoring of patients prostatectomized for prostatic cancer. We have evaluated a commercially available ultrasensitive PSA assay (Immulite Third Generation PSA-DPC-Los Angeles CA) in comparison with the routinely used PSA (Immulite PSA-DPC-Los Angeles CA). When evaluated with different approaches, the analytical sensitivity of ultrasensitive PSA ranged between 0.0029 and 0.0038 ng/ml. The biological detection limit was 0.0098 ng/ml. Dilution of samples with low PSA levels showed a good recovery (from 88 to 113%) up to 1:128 dilution factor (final PSA levels ranging from 0.004 to 0.016 ng/ml in different samples). The assay precision was excellent in the low dose range, the highest interassay interadjustment CV among replicates being 5.84% when assaying serum samples with PSA lower than 1.0 ng/ml. Besides its role in the follow-up of prostatectomized patients, the evaluated ultrasensitive PSA could be reliably used for the detection of clinically meaningful PSA variations in the low dose range, and it could therefore be a candidate for the assessment of PSA velocity.

Relationship between cathepsin D and other pathological and biological parameters in 1752 patients with primary breast cancer.

The relationship between cathepsin D and other pathological or biological prognostic parameters has not yet been defined through systematic studies in breast cancer. The aim of the present investigation was to define the relationship between cathepsin D and nodal status, tumour size, steroid receptors and tumour grade in a wide patient series. Cytosol cathepsin D was assayed with an immunoradiometric assay in tumour samples from 1752 patients. A statistically significant, but not biologically meaningful association was found between cathepsin D and both tumour size and grade. Cathepsin D was significantly higher in node-positive than in node-negative tumours. However, cathepsin D is not of great use in order to predict the risk of axillary metastases in individual patients, due to overlapping of cathepsin D values between node-positive and node-negative cases. A significant, direct association was found between cathepsin D and both oestrogen receptor and progesterone receptor cytosol levels. Nevertheless, preliminary data indicate that cathepsin D and steroid receptors provide independent prognostic information.

Tumor markers in breast cancer follow-up: a potentially useful parameter still awaiting definitive assessment. Forza Operativa Nazionale sul Carcinoma Mammario (FONCaM).

BACKGROUND: Although tumor markers are frequently used in the follow-up of patients with breast cancer, two points are still being debated: 1) their cost/effectiveness has been neither demonstrated nor disproved; 2) the reliability of the currently used dichotomous division into a positive/negative cut-off should be definitely validated. Dynamic criteria of interpretation based on serial serum samples would probably be more effective for early detection of relapse. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The aim of the present study was to compare the dichotomous cut-off based decision criteria to a dynamic serial sample based assessment of tumor markers. Since 1989, 794 patients have been followed in 11 institutions. CEA and CA15.3 were measured once a month for three months before every clinical examination. The present paper concerns the evaluation variability in 405 patients without evidence of disease in the first three institutions joining the study. RESULTS: In patients without evidence of disease, the coefficient of variation of all samples for every patient showed a median value of 19 for CEA and 21 for CA15.3. Variability was negatively associated with the antigen level and was most likely due to the analytical component. This was also confirmed by the significant difference in variability among the three institutions evaluated. The median value of the critical difference was 53% for CEA and 57% for CA15.3. CONCLUSIONS: 1) Individually tailored dynamic decision criteria are applicable in about 50% of the cases. 2) The problem of improving the precision of tumor marker assays in the low dose range must be urgently addressed to the manufacturers of tumor markers by the scientific community in order to apply individually tailored decision criteria for patients in whom the serum level of biological markers is low.

Tissue polypeptide antigen and tissue polypeptide specific antigen in primary breast cancer. Evaluation in serum and tumour tissue.

Tissue polypeptide antigen, measured by both a polyclonal antibody (TPA IRMA Prolifigen) and a monoclonal antibody prototype kit (TPA-M IRMA Prolifigen), and the tissue polypeptide specific antigen were evaluated. The markers were measured in 266 serum samples and in 291 tumour cytosols from patients with primary breast cancer. The three markers were available in matched pairs of both serum and cytosol from the same patient in 144 cases. Diagnostic sensitivity of serum levels of the three markers was not significantly different when using cut-off values calculated on the basis of healthy subjects. In the cytosol, tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA IRMA), tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA-M IRMA) and tissue polypeptide specific antigen were significantly correlated with steroid receptor status, while their serum levels were not. Cytosol and serum levels of the three markers were not significantly associated. All three were significantly correlated both in serum and in cytosol. The association was closer between tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA IRMA) and tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA-M IRMA) than between each of these two markers and tissue polypeptide specific antigen. From these findings we draw the following conclusions: 1. Tissue polypeptide specific antigen (TPA IRMA) and tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA-M IRMA) probably provide superimposable information both in serum and in cytosol; 2. Tissue polypeptide specific antigen and tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA IRMA) or tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA-M IRMA), although closely associated, probably measure in part different cytokeratins. Therefore, they should not be considered interchangeable in individual patients; 3. The determination of the markers in serum and in cytosol provides different information concerning the tumour phenotype.